The Slavery and Pedophilia Ring Known as the Traditional “Nuclear” Family

slaveryI was 9-years old and riding in the back seat of the car when, in the course of some conversation between my parents in the front seat, I blurted out that I would never be treated like my mother was treated (by my father – this was implied, not stated). And, my father started screaming at me, telling me I was being influenced by “liberal” teachers at school and this wasn’t really my opinion. But, of course, I had seen by the age of 9 all kinds of abuse and I had been subjected to plenty of it because we were a typical, average, normal, even enviable, example of the traditional nuclear family. My parents never divorced, were never married to other people. My mother never even dated another male.

slavery2She married my father to escape her own traditional nuclear family in which she was a slave, raped by a family member as an infant, abused, beaten, and forced to cook for and clean up after her brothers, and denied an education (was not permitted to graduate by her father who said that women only needed to know how to cook and clean). She, also, had a couple of brothers who were not very good examples of human beings. I don’t blame my mother for any of the abuse because even to this day, she cannot see it, cannot recognize that it happened, denies outright things she told me definitively occurred in the past, and simply is unable to mentally cope with the reality, with the terrible, terrible reality, of this. Nor is she able to recall any of the abuses that my father inflicted on me. She has no memory of it.

slavery3

Note that the women are smiling in all these images, including this one, because enslavement to men is supposed to be fun, fulfilling, and natural for women.

I always knew something was wrong with “the family.” It’s such an evil institution that it has to be reinforced over and over again, like other evils, through religion and government reinforcement, ie. licensed marriage. If it were not forced and reinforced, no woman or girl would voluntarily participate in it. It is nothing more than a slave institution and one that allows men to get their hands on women and little girls, to abuse them, sexually, physically, psychologically, emotionally, and in every other way.

I was relieved when I ran across an old volume of a feminist magazine, “No More Fun and Games: A Journal of Female Liberation,” Vol. 1, No. 1, 1968. In about the third article it talks about the old Roman slavery unit, we know as the traditional nuclear family. It is a slave institution, hierarchical in nature, with a man at the top, a woman, her children, and his other slaves beneath him. He had/has power of life and death over his wife and her children. When we examine this, we see why men sexually abuse their daughters, rape their wives, and sometimes stalk and kill them when they try to escape. This is the institutional origins of male entitlement to women and girls.

I read it for the first time a few years ago, but it bears reviewing. I thought of it, again, as I was digging around in some old books about the American Indian civilizations south of the border. I’ve mentioned before that I love Germany, but I’m also a big lover of Mexico. I speak Spanish (like a Mexican and proudly so) and I like to keep an eye on events down south of the border.

Before the first modern Europeans are recorded to have come (in the 16th century to Mexico – the Columbus story is a fraud, of course. He was never on this continent.) to Mexico, there was an entirely different kind of civilization there. The Spanish religious men who came decimated most, but not all, records of these people, their social order, and their ways. Many of their languages still survive (in fact, we use a few of their words in American English, usually for animals and plants).  These were and are written languages and the people had sophisticated systems of mathematics, architecture, astronomy, botany, and medicine.  The Spanish religious men seemed to be especially appalled that many of the tribes and their cities were led and built by women and they made a point of destroying those cities, records of them, and, of course, torturing (including sexually, of course) the women, who were primary targets of the Mexican [Spanish] Inquisition.

I have been trying to piece together certain things about these people and how they lived, why they did certain things, which make no sense in a civilization where you have the traditional nuclear family. It has occurred to me that they had a completely different system (one that probably led to a maintenance, but not a great growth of the population, especially the male half of it) and that this is what allowed them to do the marvelous things they did.

When women are not enslaved, when men are not constantly making war on women, civilizations advance. Some of them live in peace for a long time and they progress technologically and spiritually (I apologize for using that word, “spiritually,” but there’s  not a good English word for what I really want to say). They are able to develop abilities that are considered “superhuman” or “magical” or “sorcery” by the likes of white, European men. And, maybe that’s another reason why they just won’t leave us the Hell alone in any circumstance.

This is intended to be a short post. I just want to leave you with that thought and with the link to that 130 page magazine. If you download the .pdf file, it’s probably easier to read. I hope you enjoy it, if you haven’t seen it already.

 

Where are All the Women?: Women have gone missing from politics, journalism, are being enslaved, and our lives are being literally snuffed out.

Enslaved

I haven’t posted for a little while and I wonder if my three (approximately) readers wonder where I’ve been. I’ve been working and not just in ordinary ways, but really planning and plotting, as I’ve done in the past by degrees, how to get out of the grasp of men and their criminal filth. Essentially, what is on my mind is how to escape slavery, not the sex kind, but the financial kind, although these two forms of enslavement frequently go together. At least, I don’t have men attacking me at my workplace or chasing me around my house with a knife and a dick. So, things in my life and in my “relations” with men are much better than they used to be, simply because I have, thus far, managed to arrange my life so that I can go weeks at a time without even having to look at an actual man. I suggest that this should be the ultimate goal for all women who want to stay alive.

Tax time was rough for me. My business was hit hard beginning about three years ago when they first began implementing Obamacare. If you look around you, at least in some places in the U.S., it will probably not escape your notice that retail is dying by degrees. There are empty strip malls,  each empty spot is one that some commercial real estate entrepreneur will not be able to lease out, and will eventually not be able to pay the outrageous property taxes on, and it will eventually end up in the hands of the local government. And, I can testify that the media are lying when they blame it on internet sales. Everything is down compared to where it was in about 2014, including ecommerce.

Furthermore, I can tell you that the outlook is even worse in the U.K. and those countries caught in the snare of the E.U. They are suffering economically, although, this is not being discussed too much, I think, because, firstly, they have their draconian social welfare systems so they don’t feel it as acutely essentially because they are already too damn poor to notice (having been born into this system) and, secondly, because it has been overshadowed by news of Muslim and leftist violence. I realize that is not how it is being characterized in the mainstream news, but that is what is happening, at least, in Germany, which is the financial keystone of the E.U. The implementation of an overly complex system of VAT taxes, which were raised to outrageous proportions back in about 2014(?), have also crushed whatever entrepreneurial spirit that once existed – and not just their spirits, they simply cannot afford to be in business anymore because of the heavy taxes.

Here in the U.S. it is reported that business owners are paying the highest tax rate in the allegedly free world. The self-employed (which is many, if not most, women, who are the bulk of entrepreneurs in the U.S.) are being taxed at the highest rate. I read a report (which I cannot find) that freelancers are paying a rate of 45% in income tax and now, if anyone pays you $400 USD, you are to be reported to the IRS and forced to pay them a percentage of it. It doesn’t matter if you are on the poverty line, as I am since they began enforcing Obamacare and my earnings plummeted.

So, I was under a lot of stress this year because apparently it is now essentially illegal to earn a living in the U.S., you will be fined and taxed, every way from Sunday, and that’s just the bogus Social Security taxes and state and Fed income taxes. On top of these income-based taxes, there are now exorbitant sales taxes on everything, including food, which initially they did not tax or taxed at a lower rate. There are, also, personal and outtasight real property taxes you have to pay, if you want to have a roof over your head and don’t have the stamina to walk 20 miles to the nearest grocery store. And, if you don’t pay those taxes, you will take your house and eventually put you in jail for failure to license a vehicle (can’t get the license if you don’t pay all your taxes).

As you will remember if you live in the U.S. and pay taxes (which only about half of us do, anymore) right before tax filing time, the Feds still couldn’t decide whether we have Obamacare or don’t have it. I had an asinine discussion with an authoritarian (male) tax accountant who is a proponent of allopathic medicine (and who subsequently caught the flu, because the patriarchal medical establishment is so remarkably deficient that they have not yet “discovered” how to prevent or treat it (something we witch doctors and savages know well), and which delayed my taxes being done in a timely manner, thus causing me great distress).  So, I discovered that my family’s tax accountant is a complete moron. I’m planning on hiring an very intelligent-seeming woman for next year.

So, it very strongly occurred to me, more than ever before, that how much of my hard, hard-earned money – because it is not easy for women to earn money off our backs in this country – I was going to be forced to hand over to the plantation owners was entirely in the hands of a bunch of men and a handful of Commie-sympathizing women like Nancy “We’ve got to pass it so we can read what’s in it” Pelosi.  Would I be fined $800 I don’t have or not? Will I have to pay $1,300 I’m even less likely to have next year (because every utility, every necessity of life, has gone up and not just for me, but for everyone!)?  And, as this progressive Obamcare thing goes on (I use the present tense because I am still not yet assured that it has been entirely repealed yet – repealed by all dudes, of course), they are going to increase the fines and eventually confiscate homes and imprison people (witches – really, witches, who don’t practice or believe in patriarchal medicine or religion) like me. I even had thoughts of joining some wack job patriarchal religious group that’s on the exemption list, except I don’t think there’s a single one within a 100 mile radius of here.

Well, I was saved by the stroke of Donald Trump’s presidential pen, which made an exemption for those of us living in areas where there is no affordable (using an arbitrary percentage decided by men to determine what is affordable for me) Obamacare option. Luckily, in some mostly rural and sparsely populated places there is no longer a Fed-approved insurance company and I’m in one of those areas. What’s so fucking scary is that I actually had feelings of gratitude toward that man, Trump. I recognized it as “the protection racket” and as Stockholm Syndrome. You have to be away from men for a while before you begin to recognize it because when you are around them, you experience it all the time whenever they do something helpful and not apparently-at-that-moment abusive. It’s the feeling of being held captive (and I have been, at gunpoint) by men and literally having bad cop and good cop thrown into the mix and you are so grateful to “good cop” even though you know he’s one of the criminal abusers. But, you “love” good cop, no matter how repulsive he is, because he appears (the key is “appears”) to be doing something to help you, to mitigate the crimes being perpetrated against you by bad cop and his gun-wielding, penis-wielding henchmen.

I am – or was, anyway – a member of the middle class. I use the term in a non-Marxist way, of course, because it is not possible to understand the economic and social order of things in the U.S. in Marxist or European terms. Marx did not invent those terms and there were middle classes in Europe long before he was born – and some of them were, also, my ancestors. In the European Middle Ages, I would be, at least, a baroness. We don’t have titles here and it is normal for people to own property and to own the things by which they earn a living. Our middle classes are some kind of working people, whether we work with our hands or our minds, and I would argue that all of us whether we are farmers or artists do both of these things. It is my very strong opinion that poverty or not poverty is, to some degree, a state of mind. Of course, there must be opportunities, which I have certainly been denied as a small, blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman.

But, what is important is what is in the mind. And, I’m going to tell you, my dear internet feminist friends, what that is that is in my mind and which has been turning over and over in my mind since I so poignantly realized that my financial fate, my very life, in fact, is in the hands of a vague group of male perverts in Washington D.C. who are sharing a wolf pack’s meal with other men who have corporate and banking interests and who are literally eating my lunch! I want to start with the warped concept of the “American Dream,” which is a steaming pile of commercialized bull dung. I’m not sure when this concept emerged, but I strongly associate it with things like Ellis Island and mass immigration from countries where people are crawling with lice and infested with easily prevented communicable diseases. I, also, have a vague Chevrolet commercial jingle, “baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and Chevrolet,” running through my head whenever I hear the words, “American Dream.”

I understand that in the last 100 or so years a lot of people came to the U.S. hoping to get out of some kind of poverty or to escape alleged persecution somewhere (often a projection, since many of these people were themselves the agitators and criminals wherever they came from). They brought some lovely gifts with them, too, such as the mafia, socialism/Communism, pedo-run Hollywood, and policing, which like socialism, serial killers, and international banking tyranny seems to be a British “gift.” (Although, we know there are other actors involved in these things, and we know who they are and regardless of their nebulous national origin, these conspirators have all been MEN.)

They came up with this American Dream, which consists of owning a house, maybe with a white picket fence, 2.4 children, and a dog. The American Dream, is supposedly about the opportunity to achieve material success through hard work, the pulling up of one’s boot straps. But, that was not the dream of my American ancestors.

No, it wasn’t. There was one dream my Muscogee and Cherokee ancestors shared and that was firstly and foremostly to be left the hell alone by the European invaders. My European ancestors fell into two different main groups. One group were early English who fought in the American Revolution and some of them were granted land as payment in the deep South, where they mingled the bloodline with the natives. Some of my early European ancestors were the leaders of what is known in England as The Wyatt Rebellion. They would be considered patriots here and leaders, some of the men were heads of state, although apparently they are still regarded as criminals in England, which says a lot about England and how little it has changed. (I have an uncle who is practically a dead ringer for the leader of the rebellion, his nose, his eyes, his coloring, the shape of his face!)  Their crime? They wanted to be left the hell alone by Mary Queen of Scots and not be taxed into an early grave, not to have their homes taken, not to be imprisoned and beheaded as some of my direct ancestors were. Since the 17th century English middle class (landed noblemen) was so small, since the average English person (then as today) lived in grinding poverty with little besides the clothes on their backs to call their own, my ancestors were unable to get the English commoners behind them in their cause. (And, I cannot tell you how much this resembles the state of affairs here in the U.S. today as this descendants of this same rabble with their European socialist (enslavement) mentality has been coming to our shores now for a long time and they are the ones who want to tax me, personally, into an early grave, to take all I have, all I’ve worked for, and what little my ancestors have been able to preserve of our heritage and our know-how, and put me in a prison because I will not go along with their atrocities.)

Another group of my European ancestors came later. With a degree of wealth, they came from France to what was, at that time, also France. With what was in their minds as much as with their hands, they began a settlement in the wilderness on the outskirts of the frontier – not the frontier, not yet – but wilderness, with various Indian tribes surrounding them on all sides and along the banks of a very great and terrifying river. With their minds – and I emphasis this because it is important here because they could not have done it by their hands, alone – they began building and they eventually erected a town, surrounded by orchards and fields in which they grew wheat, grapes, and other fruit. They made wine and established the first agricultural trading network in the region and they lived at peace, to my knowledge, with the natives. And, I have many French-looking relatives, but also some who are probably native and this would likely have been hidden because my family on that side, to this day, is very Old World, conservative, and proper.  This place has a hidden history. I ran across it a few years ago and it blew my mind, but I don’t know what to do with the information, so I’ve done nothing. But, suffice it to say there was a good dose of “savage” and “witch doctory” in my ancestors. And, why do you suppose they went, not to the frontier, but to the outskirts of it, in the wilderness, in the middle of Nowhere, to re-establish themselves while the guillotines fell in France?! What was their dream? It was to be left the hell alone. They just wanted to live their lives in peace and do what they did, which was farm and drink a little wine now and then.

The real “American Dream” is not about things, nor is it about acquiring things, whether through hard work or the establishment of a cartel system of some kind. It is not about getting out of poverty. It is not about acquiring real estate. It’s not about eating hot dogs and driving Chevrolets. No, it is about this one elusive state of being, which is simply to be left the hell alone! The true American dream is the desire not to be robbed, raped, or assassinated! And, let me tell you, it has been extremely elusive, at least, for me it has been. And, like my great American ancestors before me, all I can think of is how to get the hell away from this criminal filth. Far, far away! But, now, they are not just coming with their earthly feet, they are coming with their patriarchal systems of control and they have all kinds. As we see, they have their patriarchal medical system with its roots in their, leeching, bleeding, deeply perverse witch-burning days, which they charge outrageous fees for and then insist that we all purchase insurance to support or they’re going to take our money, our livelihood, our food and shelter, our freedom, and eventually our lives on the basis of it. They have their fraudulent, Jewish-run financial system, which they have embedded in their fraudulent system of appalling so-called laws. And, of course, they have their highly sexualized, perverse, social system, which they insist on inflicting on us from the time we draw our first breath.  Oh, yes, the Great White Father, his Jewish mafia family and their many associates have ways of reaching us no matter how hard we try to move out further and further away from them.

So, for weeks now (and really months and months before) since pre-tax time, I have been thinking. What is the answer? And, all I can come up with is this: Fewer and fewer personal expenditures and less and less taxable income. And, I have been thinking day and night about how to achieve this and while I, unfortunately, cannot directly tell you what I have come up with, I have come up with something and I have been busy implementing it. It is a plan to escape men’s attempts to enslave me, once again.

The men who came here to this continent, even early on, were about enslaving other people. They brought white women with them as slaves. The tribes and the Europeans both kidnapped, raped, and enslaved women of both races. And, this was not long ago, as my great-great grandmother and my great-grandfather were once kidnapped by a hostile tribe near their settlement, but managed to escape as their captors were severely inebriated. And, I have another white grandmother who disappeared, who was taken captive by another tribe. So, this targeting, abuse, and enslavement of women and little girls, whether white or red, has gone on on this continent for along time. And, to me the oppressor’s race is interchangeable and mostly immaterial. That’s because the primary problem is not one of race or nationality, but of men. Until we eliminate males, we will always be devising ways to escape enslavement by them.

And, of course, as every radical feminist knows, the worst aspect of this enslavement is what they do to our minds. They do these things to our minds through abuses, directly through rape, by one or more of them deciding to bring us close to Death, every so often, and they do it through more subtle means of communication. It’s not just the indoctrination into femininity, but everything you are in contact with in the culture, even high culture, classical art, literature, music, etc. It is inescapable. It surrounds us like a dense fog. The only way I can tell you to begin to escape is to detach from society. This is not easy to do, primarily because you’ve got to have money to live.

Because we have to have money to live, it is not easy to completely detach from men’s society and system. Men invented this heinous economic system. Men erected and permitted the illegal entity known as the Federal Treasury and its violent enforcer, the IRS. By now, everyone knows it’s illegal, but it doesn’t really matter what is legal or not when there are men determined to do evil.

So, long story short, I’ve been absent from blogging here because I have been running from poverty and criminality. I have been think very hard how to get free from all of these snares and traps.  I’ve been scheming and devising ways to carry out my plans because I refuse to live my life at the whim of a bunch of goddamn male perverts in Washington D.C. or anywhere else. Moreover, I think it is clear, as radical feminists, the best we are going to be able to do is save ourselves.  We’ll be lucky if we can do that. We are certainly in no position to be able to save other women. And, in writing this, all I can give you is my words and what is in my mind, which I am not able to communicate well and some of which I cannot tell. But I think it is important that women, who want to stay alive, detach themselves as much as possible from men and their systems. As it was in Europe many centuries ago when women were being systematically, openly murdered by men, I think it is important that we play our cards close to our vests, that we make the most of the nighttime and the darkness. I urge you to consider how you can free yourself from this treacherous evil that pursues us, even at a distance, in remote places over rock and hill. Put your mind to it 100% – think! How can you free yourself from them. You will find answers because those answers are there to be found.

I have been absent from this blog for a while because I’ve been working to stay alive and trying to work these problems out. I have wondered where the other radical feminists have gone? I only read the writings of a very few lately and I can only imagine that they are going through something similar to what I am going through right now. All I see now, anywhere, are men. All of YouTube is men now. There are almost no American women, at all, and very few white American ones who aren’t doing make-up tutorials or telling stories about attending drug parties – and these are youngsters. Where are the women? Well, of course, they are working and dodging stalkers – that’s pretty much what we all do.

Women’s Lives Snuffed Out

Of course, some women are missing because they have been murdered by men. Quite a few of them are being murdered by police. A few posts back I was talking about Toni Anderson, missing in the Kansas City area back in January. The story is both horrible and predictable. The media there in K.C. and it appears a national media outlet have worked to defame her and to cover up what happened. It appears that there were two cops in the SUV behind her, that they were there for 15 minutes, and I believe one of them may have captured her car’s radio-frequency key code (this is only my theory) and slipped into her car, which is why it went the wrong direction on the highway. She was mysteriously found, in her car, submerged in water, after the cops couldn’t find her and private investigators were called in by family and boyfriend and his father. The cops took her body and the badly (strangely) mangled car away by tow truck, failing to preserve evidence and without the provision of a private coroner’s report, and her body was almost immediately cremated. You can read this story over and over again with different women, all good-looking and athletic (all dancers, cheerleaders, or other types of athletes) throughout the U.S., with basically the same M.O. once the heat is on the cops. In short, a whole lot of pretty women and little girls are missing in the country and a whole lot of cops seem to be involved.

Another reason I have not posted is that I was personally pretty torn up over what happened to Toni Anderson and I really can’t bear to write too much more about it. I’m, also, dismayed by the reaction of her parents and I think they are either extremely delusional, suburban, white-bread folks with no real life experience or else they have been threatened by the cops. The statement read by her mother to the media was like something out of original Manchurian Candidate movie with Frank Sinatra: “[Cops are] the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human beings I’ve ever known in my life.”

But, you should know that if you have a car with a radio frequency on its key or ignition, it is easy for a rapist or killer to use a cheap device to capture the signal and relay it, at will, to get into your car after you have locked it using your radio-frequency-emitting-key chain device, especially when he’s sitting behind you for 15 minutes while you’re putting gas in your car late at night in North Kansas City, MO.

The pattern of events that followed Toni Anderson’s apparent abduction is similar to that of  Mitrice Richardson (a pretty, young black woman from California who studied dance and was a competitive dancer) and others I’ve looked at, in which women were apparently abducted and usually raped and murdered by cops. And, of course, there are many other similar, attractive (not always white, but always pretty and in great physical condition) young women who have gone missing.

If anyone thinks the witch hunting is over, they need to look twice at this! I see Obamacare and the allopathic medical cartel as another manifestation of it, as well. This thing has never ended, it’s just morphed.

Women Missing from Journalism and Politics

Also, with regard to absentee women, the fields of both more mainstream journalism and politics have become more and more male-dominated (and you may have noticed that these men on television, radio, and internet videos are yelling, constantly yelling at the top of their lungs! They run everything, but they are still very, very angry for some reason), more than I can remember since maybe the early 1970s. By all appearances, whatever apparent progress our foremothers made, has been mostly decimated. I wonder where the women are, but at the same time, I know the answer. For one thing, all the groping, rubbing, patting, and sexual innuendo that we deal with when ever we have to interact with males is an obvious reason for this outcome. The horrifying behavior of men toward even sexually conforming (apparently heterosexual and femininity-performing, and even cock-sucking) women at FoxNews has brought it all before the eyes of the public. Also, the same is true with many of the male politicians, notably Joe Biden, and I always think whenever I see a gathering of political men in the media, that the women are absent simply because they do not want to deal with all the rubbing, groping, and ape-like sexual behaviors of those men in suits who are making all the governmental decisions for us. I think women are missing from these places and from every place because we are sick and tired of being threatened and felt up.

Personally, I am in a state of perpetual disgust. I’m sick of men slathering their bodily fluids all over me, all over other women and little girls (this pizza-pedo-gate thing has brought some disturbing, although predictable things to the surface – mostly data gathered by other men who laughably claim to be anti-pedo and anti-rape and placed all over YouTube), and all over everything while systematically trying to rob me. That’s pretty much the definition of “domestic abuse.” We are all being domestically abused by men on a grand scale! At this moment, I am being abused by them financially and through their patriarchal medical system, which literally makes me sick to my stomach. It just so horrifying. I am so repelled and that is why all I can think about is how to get free! It seems like my whole life, since I was 5-years old, has been about how to get away from nasty, sick males. I can only imagine that a whole lot of other women are MIA because, they are either already abducted or dead at the hands of men, or are working on a plan to escape and stay alive.

How the Religious Right and the Liberal Left Justify Men’s Rape and Sexual Assault of Women and Girls

slevogt_faun_and_a_girlIn this post, I propose the reason why both the religious right (Christians, Jews and Muslims) and the liberal left – two groups who appear, on the surface, to be at odds with each other – both justify and support men raping and brutalizing women and girls. This runs deep, at least, 5,000 years, and cannot be eradicated through social change. It just is and, if you are a woman or a girl living on this planet, you need to know about it so you can try to save your own life as best you can.

Men (and boys) believe they have a fundamental, natural right to harm women and girls. They believe this is part of the “natural order.” If they are religious, they believe this “natural order” comes from God, Jesus, Jehovah, or Mohammed. If they are on the left, they may believe that it is “scientific,” in which case they will cite the behavior of animals or the work of Darwin.

It is all simply a justification for men’s violence toward women and girls. There is no “natural order” that must propogate the human race or that makes rape, as the Christian leader of the Republican Party, Paul Ryan once put it, “a method of conception.”

This fundamental belief that it is normal for men to stick their dicks in women and girls and to harm us in other ways, as well, is absorbed by the victims, women and girls, in patriarchy, who are truly bound in a state of mass Stockholm Syndrome.

The right-wing women are loving males to survive. They usually have husbands and sons or they have other males in their families they feel they must defend from the “evil,” “plotting,” “feminist,” “lying” women who dare say they have been harmed by males.

They’re a lot like Melania Trump, who right now has nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. I felt her panic when I saw the two interviews she did after her husband was exposed on tape talking about sexual assault, ie. “grab ’em by the pussy,” but he’s got her all tied up the way men always tie women up before they do other things, the most brutal and horrific things – she’s controlled by economics, by a lack of money, by a fear of homelessness and probably of her parents’ homelessness (since the former Soviets now live in Trump Towers, according to reports). How terrified she must be to be married to a man accused by so many credible women of sexual assault and rape. His first wife stated under oath in an affidavit that he pulled her hair and raped her. Think how frightening it must be to be in this situation as the third wife! Outside, she is going nowhere, she’s “standing by her man,” but on the inside she’s running for her life right now!

Right-wing women and left-wing women all absorb the deeply ingrained belief that women and girls exist for men to do evil to.  Both love men to survive in one way  or another. They completely absorb the belief that they deserve it to be done to them. This is how they justify sexual assault, porn, and prostitution. Sometimes we justify it this way even when these things are happening to us, ourselves, as individuals. We hope the world is different – that there is one man who is different. But, there isn’t. No matter what they say to us, they all hold the same fundamental belief that we exist for their pleasure – to have dominion over, as the earth – to use, to destroy if they wish and we have no recourse except to take it because it is our lot in life. They believe we like it. “You like that, don’cha?” they often say while they are beating, raping and killing us. They laugh while they rape us because torturing and murdering us isn’t just a thousands-years old belief, it’s their joie de vivre and their raison d’être.

I remember being told when I was 13-years old and didn’t want to go out with a boy (I wasn’t allowed to date ’til 16, anyway) that I “deserve whatever happens to me.” That statement from a faceless boy still echoes in my mind especially because so many terrible things have happened to me and no one cared. There was not even anyone to tell. Only recently have some of these things been considered crimes, at all.

I understand and I want you, the reader, to understand that all the terrible things that males have done to you, they have done because they hold this fundamental belief that men harming women is the natural order – it is “god’s will” or it is “how the species propagates itself,” depending on the politics and religious views of the male. Women who persecute you have absorbed this belief, as well.

But, this is not why we are here. We were all born for greater things. (This is Luciferian philosophy, similar to that which you’ll find in the works of Madame Blavatsky, that we are capable of super human greatness.) We are something other than animals. We are spirits (complex energy operating simultaneously on other planes of existence) who are capable of amazing things.

I do not expect that the men and boys who do these things to us will ever be made to pay for their crimes and I do believe that the only way to eradicate the practice of males harming women and girls is to eliminate the males, entirely. This belief that we are here for them to harm is so great in them and runs so deep that it will never be eradicated from them because it is who and what they are. They are forever mortal enemies to us. They serve no purpose except to pollute and to make war and misery for women and girls. They are nothing but poisonous weeds in what could be a beautiful garden.

The Power of Fiction to Rewrite the Patriarchal Narrative: Free College-level Writing Courses

Dosso_Dossi_006

Woman Writing

In several of my recent posts, such as, “Radical Feminist Analysis of Dark Shadows, The Television Series (1966-1971),” and “Men’s Propaganda War on Women: Television Sitcoms Designed to Groom Women and Girls for Male Sexual Depravity,” I’ve discussed the use of fiction, mostly in the media of movies and television, to create narratives about society and the relationships of men and women that support the patriarchal establishment and which is highly detrimental to women and girls. I have discussed the almost complete control that men have over the movie industry and how they channel the energy of the most powerful women to the service of males in films, such as in my blogpost, “A Radical Feminist Perspective on Witchcraft Movies: Movie-makers Throw Witches and Women a Bone.” I’ve discussed the television series, “Roseanne,” and how this is regarded as a feminist television show, although, the feminism of the characters is very limited by their social class. I’ve talked about how little has really changed in the portrayal of women in television, of which the television show, “The King of Queens,” is a good example.

Television shows and movies all rely on scripts. Some are originally written as plays while others are adapted into scripts from other forms of fiction, usually novels, novellas, and short stories.

I find that the power of fiction to influence people is generally underestimated. In particular, I’ve noticed that a lot of feminists (including radical ones) are aware of the power of non-fiction. In fact, most are brilliant at writing it, at telling their own personal stories about matters that are difficult to talk about and would be impossible to talk about without the relative anonymity of the internet. But, many regard non-fiction as being more important and may be quick to dismiss fiction.

In fact, this post is inspired by  an online discussion with someone who is a very powerfully influential and courageous exited-woman (one who was trafficked as a child and survived!) and I found she was quick to dismiss fiction as the construction of some far off ideal or the creation of a feminist utopia that can never be. While there has been some fiction that imagines life without men, such as Herland, published in 1915 by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, there are other ways to approach writing radical feminist literature.

The examples of such writing are very few because, as I’ve shown in previous posts, fictional narratives must serve men or else they will not see the light of day. Historically, women were forbidden to write and those who did were regarded as whores, which is why they were rarely published, had to publish under masculine-sounding names, and when they wrote, they served men in their writing, such as was the case with Jane Austen, who was praised to high heaven in her time by the likes of Sir Walter Scott and the Prince Regent of England.

Writing, publishing and now movie-making and television-script-writing, producing and directing are still areas that men try very hard to keep women out of. Certain genres of fiction, in particular, science fiction, are very difficult for women to break into or to be acknowledged for their achievements. Sci-fi is notoriously male dominated and women who have attended sci-fi conventions, regardless of their level of achievement, have been subject to all kinds of sexual denigration by the men.

There are numerous articles and discussions online devoted just to harassment of women writers by the men, including men writers, at sci-fi writers’ events. Here’s a sampling of what women writers are subjected to, so you can see what I mean:

On Sexual Harassment at Conventions

http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Science_Fiction_Fandom

The above link makes reference to these particular events:

The Character of Sexual Harassment at Cons

You get the idea, of course, and if you’re still wondering just do an internet search on “Sexual Harassment at Sci Fi Conventions.” There’s a whole lot more.

Let me tell you the reason for this, if you don’t already know. This reason, also, spills over into the reason for the outrageous degree and number of incidents in which mobs of men attack women who create or critique games. The science fiction genre is very powerful. It is in some ways more powerful than any other genre of fiction because it is the one that can most be used to both illustrate the absurdities of society and to forge new directions – even to provide the foundation for new scientific discoveries and inventions.

The applied creative imagination is an aspect of witchcraft – truly. When we create fictional worlds and fictional characters we are at one with the creative forces of the universe.

Here are two examples of fictional novels, both written by men, as far as anyone knows, which illustrate the strangeness of our world, both of which were adapted into movies and one of them into a television series, as well:

The Man Who Fell to Earth, published in 1963, by Walter Tevis: This gives us a look at earth from the perspective of an alien from a distant planet. The alien is from a technologically advanced planet, which has run out of water. He has come to earth on a mission to save his dying planet, but is eventually caught, imprisoned, and treated about like you would expect men in white coats would treat any living creature they want to “study.” Their scientific study is an excuse for torture.

Logan’s Run, by William F. Nolan, published in 1967: This is one of my favorite science fiction stories of all time. It’s far better than Star Wars because it tells the truth about mind control in a way that could only be done in fiction. It illustrates how mind control, especially when the system has been in place for centuries, operates to imprison people in their own minds through belief – blind belief. In this story, there has been a nuclear event in the past and civilization only survived by living in the domed city. It looks like paradise, but it is a prison in which everyone must die at age 30, believing that they will be “renewed.” They believe that there is no outside and those who are not part of their organized civilization, which is actually a soft tyranny, are savages. Logan’s Run bears some similarities to Aldous Huxley’s A Brave New World, but I actually think Logan’s Run is even better. Ideally, they should probably be read together because the relationship between the two works seems undeniable.

The men fight to keep this powerful genre out of the hands of women because it is through science fiction that their own evils can be most easily illuminated. The stories in which feminist author’s create utopias, in which men and their power over us is either eliminated or greatly diminished, would fall into this category of fiction.

But, there are other genres that could be just as powerful, if used in the service of women instead of males.

An example of this – and, as you know, there are very few in either books or film, especially since both have been entirely in the hands of men and very controlled by them until very, very recently – an example of how fiction is used in the service of women may be found in one of my favorite witchcraft movies, Season of the Witch, (aka. Hungry Wives or Jack’s Wife), which was made in about 1971, and supposedly the script was written by George A. Romero. Although, I have my doubts about how much he wrote of it, since it may well have been primarily the work of his wife at that time.

Season of the Witch, is of the horror genre, which is, also, a very illuminating one, as discussed a little bit in one of my recent posts on the television show, Dark Shadows. Horror probably does the most to tell the truth about the lives of women and about the nature of men. In Season of the Witch, we do not see a feminist utopia, but a terrible reality, which a woman (and her daughter, to a lesser extent) must somehow escape. She does this by renouncing patriarchal religion and patriarchal cultural norms (to the best of her ability) and embracing her true nature (symbolized by the Green Man chasing her through the house in dreams) as a witch. Eventually, she frees herself in a very real and unexpected way and we are left, as the audience, to decide whether it was witchcraft or not. (I think it was!)  This film is very valuable because its protagonist provides a role model to women. It is, also, a cautionary tale about marriage and the nature of men.

Romero, himself, has described it as a commentary on Women’s Liberation, but it is not something on a large scale, but rather something very personal in one woman’s life. It is one small victory for this woman, which if modeled would be a victory for all of womankind.

It, also, a story we can all relate to in some way, as feminists, because we have had to free ourselves one way or another from the mind control programming laid on us from the time we were infants, enforced by psychological and physical abuse. It takes courage to break free from that – and, unfortunately, it’s something most women never do.

The patriarchal programming of little girls and of adult women through fiction is so absolute. We are inculcated with their sick, twisted ideas about us and our nature to the point that we begin to believe it ourselves. There is so little for girls and women to grab onto as examples of how to plot a path to freedom – and this is where radical feminists writing fiction can make a difference.

I believe we can re-write the world, that we can – through the power of imagination – forge a way out of this dark prison and help lead other girls and women out by providing fictional models of women who have overcome male domination.

I’ve had my own ideas about this for a while, but I’ve never tried to actually write the story. Oh, I’ve put some things down on paper, but there is an art – a craft, a skill, and knowledge – that goes into writing fiction well. So, I have these ideas revolving in my mind. Every day I wake up with them and I feel like a caged animal, thinking, planning, every day how to break out and how to rescue my fellow prisoners. I think this is the answer. We are going to have to write our way free!

You can imagine an ideal world for women. That’s good. But, if that’s too unrealistic for your tastes, you can imagine a world in which one little thing has been made better for girls and women. You can take one little thing like that and run with it and see where it takes you. What if women had complete reproductive rights? What if women never needed to fear rape, again? What if women had as much economic power as men do?

You can take a situation, a single person, or a whole community of people, and use that as your creative experiment in freeing women in some way. What if there was a town – just one town – in which rape was taken seriously? What would happen to the women and the men in that town? What would little girls’ lives be like in such a town?

This one is for NoMorePaperTowels: What if the women in a community developed their own language that only they knew and understood?  How would that affect the people in the community, male and female? How would it change their lives? Would it alter the power dynamic?

Try to think about one tiny aspect of the patriarchy that could be chipped away at and make it happen in the life of a character or characters that you own.

I know activism is a big subject among feminists, especially the liberal feminists, but I ask you to to consider how much more change can be effected quietly, in the minds of people, moving them a little bit at a time, than by taking to the streets with megaphones and picket signs. What I am proposing is a very quiet, stealthy form of protest, in which we insist on our own creation and in which we take control of the fictional ideas that men have created to our detriment and have forced and enforced on us. This is where the real power is. This is why men get angry and attack women at sci-fi conferences, why the try to bar women from the writing and production of films and movies. But, they have had trouble controlling women writing books. They are having more trouble than ever now because the major publishing houses have lost control to digital and on-demand publishing.

Writing is an area in which women have always excelled. It’s an area in which radical feminists do phenomenal work although many of them have had limited educational opportunities, but this doesn’t stop them from being amazing, brilliant writers. I have never known a more talented group of people. I suggest that this is an opportunity, something that we should not leave on the table. We should seize it!

Free Fiction-writing Courses for You to Learn and Perfect Your Craft

Present and upcoming (soon) classes through Coursera on Creative Writing, which you can audit absolutely free!: https://www.coursera.org/specializations/creative-writing

The above courses, can be taken for credit toward a degree, but a fee applies. Of course, if you are working toward a degree at another university, you must check with them to make sure they will accept the credit or that it applies in a way that helps you accomplish the attainment of your particular degree.

But, you are free to audit the classes, which means you get to sit in on them, listen to the lectures and get the assignments, which you can complete on your own. The limitations are that you will not be able to participate in peer grading and will not be able to receive a grade.

I’m auditing a couple of these courses right now through Coursera from Wesleyan College (one of the few all-women liberal arts colleges still around) and they are excellent. I’ve previously taken similar courses from another all-women’s liberal arts college, but it has been years ago and it is wonderful to see how fresh the courses have been made. It is very enjoyable and I think it could really help anyone who is trying to write fiction.

Check Coursera often or sign up for email notifications from them (that’s what I’ve been doing for a long time!), so that you are the first to hear about exciting new classes you can audit. Some are taught by famous writers.

Radical Feminist Analysis of Dark Shadows, the Television Series (1966-1971)

Spoiler Alert: This analysis of Dark Shadows assumes familiarity with the series and does contain all kinds of suspense-wreckers. 

ds2Dark Shadows was a daytime soap opera that aired on ABC from 1966 to 1971. It began as a conventional soap opera with only ina hint of the occult. The writers and producers of this series relied heavily on classical literary themes. Throughout the series, the writers borrow from Oscar Wilde, H.P. Lovecraft, Mary Shelley, Shirley Jackson, Henry James, Edgar Allan Poe and a long list of others, which you can read about at this Wikia article.

The series creator and producer, Dan Curtis, has said that the idea for the series came to him in a dream of a young women riding a train, which is what is seen in the opening scene, in which Victoria Winters has been hired as a governess by the Collins family of mysterious Collinsport, Maine, a fictional town situated not far from Bangor. The train is taking her into an adventure – a young woman’s adventure, which is very much like Jane Eyre’s adventure in the novel of the same name by Charlotte Bronte.

But, there is another theme, a much older fictional story used in this series, which has to do with a curse placed upon a man and his descendants by a woman. It is the theme of the Biblical Garden of Eden story. This is the central theme underlying the best years of this series, which are those in which the character Barnabas Collins, the vampire, was introduced. It is not listed in the Wikia article I linked to above, perhaps because it is such an ancient theme, one that is taken for granted, and one that is not believed (especially by men) to be fiction, but is taken as the god’s honest truth for it was written, it is said by the believers, by the hand of God Himself – woman as temptress, responsible for the downfall of the first man and all his descendants. She is to blame, never the man, who would be good and not a seducing, murdering vampire, except for her going about the world tempting him to do evil all the time. She, not he, is the cause of all misery.

This part of the series does not begin right away. In the beginning, there was a young woman from an orphanage, Victoria Winters, who accepted a job offer from a mysterious family, one heretofore unknown to her. Ever in search of her true heritage, lonely and without any connection to anyone else in the world just like all the other children in the orphanage, she set out on a train in hopes of reconnecting with some sort of family. She came to find the only family she would ever know. Although, the boy she is assigned as governess to is odd and perhaps even dangerous. He leads her down dark, forbidden corridors, locks her in rooms with spiders and ghosts, and is suspected, at one point, of attempting to kill his own father. But, this is her only sense of connection and so it is easy to see why she stays on in this place. Like many women, she stays because she has no where else in the world to go.

I loved the first season of this series, although, by the end of it, its audience of mostly young women – not a highly desirable advertising demographic back in the 1960s, as they are today – was waning and the writers and producer were desperate to save the show. It was their desperation that led to the introduction of the vampire character, Barnabas Collins, played by a Shakespearean theater actor from Ontario named Jonathan Frid.

I have the feeling that the writers never really knew what they were doing right or wrong. They never really understood the appeal of the show, itself, and many times the actors have expressed their own amazement at the extremes of passion the show inspired in its dedicated fan base. They knew the show was unusual and they were part of something very remarkable, but they never really understood why it worked, either. This fact became a problem for the writers by the end of the series because they didn’t just run out of literary themes to borrow, they completely lost their grip on what made this show so appealing. My diagnosis is that this show finally died, in 1971, of testosterone poisoning. They had too many male characters fighting with each other over nothing and major, very popular female characters, playing damsels in distress wondering when their heroes, the newcomer males who became the primary characters, would return home to sweep them off their feet. This is not what their primarily female audience wanted to see and this is why the show finally died a slow death as the audience waned year after year.

But, in the first year, there was a very good balance of characters and a strong focus on the lives of the female characters. The male characters were secondary, especially to the intrepid, highly intelligent, very likable heroine, Victoria Winters. Even now – and, in fact, it is actually worse now – it is difficult to find a television program that centers on a female character and treats her with some respect. In the first season of the show, this series had four such female characters: Victoria Winters (Alexandra Moltke Isles, a blue-blood from Sweden); Maggie Evans (Kathryn Leigh Scott); Carolyn Stoddard (Nancy Barrett); and Mrs. Stoddard (Joan Bennett, a legendary actress of the silver screen).

Dark Shadows Before the Arrival of Barnabas Collins

Even before the series took off, it was very good and quite different from other programs in its class because of its infusion of metaphysical ideas, even though they were only hinted at in a Radcliffian way, at first. There were doors that seemed to open and close by themselves, which might be explained by an old house that has settled. There were strange murmurings in the corridors, which were explained away by the residents as the noises made by old houses with creaking floorboards and loose mortar. There were voices on the wind at Widows Hill, which was the residents joked about to mask their discomfort.

What made the show good throughout most of its life is that it seems clear that someone behind the scenes had a genuine interest in the occult. It’s a feeling I’ve had about only a very few other television shows (or movies, for that matter) I’ve seen. Dark Shadows seems to have laid the groundwork for these other programs during the 1970s, which some people call the Satanic years because there were so many shows with occult themes – many of which were remarkably good and make modern television programming look extremely pathetic and simple-minded by contrast. One of those old series was Kolchak: The Night Stalker (1974-1975). It is my opinion that whoever wrote that series had a serious interest in the occult. Some people have called it the predecessor of the X-files, but it was, in fact, much better and took the occult much more seriously.  (I hated the X-files!) There was a weekly series of made-for-television movies whose themes frequently explored the occult and Satanism, as well. It was called “The ABC Movie of the Week.” One of the films in that series, The Devil’s Daughter (1973), featured Jonathan Frid.

Another fascinating aspect of Dark Shadows, which makes it more interesting than most television programming, is that it was usually filmed in one straight shot, one roll of the camera, without stopping. It cost the studio a large sum every time the cameras had to be stopped and re-started. For this reason, despite any mistakes, mis-speaking of lines, forgotten lines, tripping, flies in the room crawling on the actors’ faces, loud crashing objects, crew members and sometimes actors accidentally walking into a scene, inexplicable shadows created by microphones and lighting equipment, the microphones themselves appearing in some shots, very bad – hilariously bad! – special effects, and so on, the cameras kept on rolling.

Many of the actors came from the live stage. The cast of Dark Shadows was much more like a live theater troupe than a television soap opera cast. As I watch this show, even so many years later and in black and white, I still have the feeling that I am watching a live theatrical production of the kind that is performed off Broadway in New York City. Furthermore, there was very little editing done before the program ran live on air, usually within a few hours, within a day, or at most within a week of the original filming of the episode.

Dark Shadows, also, differs from almost anything else that’s ever run on television because unlike Leave It to Beaver or Happy Days, it showed, as horror often does, a more realistic view of life. The characters are all troubled in some way or another. Most are victims of fate. They are often constrained by the social order and by the limitation of their status within it. Most of all, the characters are aware of a reality that differs from that presented in the world outside of the town of Collinsport. The center of this activity is, of course, Collinwood, the manor house, its other old structures, its grounds and, naturally, the old family cemetery.

Victoria Winters

rogerandcarolynFrom the beginning, Dark Shadows, hints at secrets, at the idea that we are not being told the truth about important matters. There are many mysteries surrounding the characters. The first mystery revolves around Victoria Winters, who presents a sharp contrast to Carolyn Stoddard, not only in her serious, conservative manner of dress but in her personality, which is often somber. Vickie never laughs quite as gaily as Carolyn does. Vickie has always had to earn her way, unlike Carolyn. There is a stark contrast between this lonely girl with no known family and the Collins family, who revel in their legacy and their heritage. Many early episodes involve her trying to discover her parentage, which she feels certain is connected with Collinwood.

Back in the 1960s and 1970s and, in fact, until the popular commercial availability of the video cassette recorder (VCR), whenever something played on television, you had better pay attention because you may never see it, again. Many fans who missed Episode 97, wondered about the true identity of Victoria Winters, so much so that after the series had ended, Joan Bennett made a video telling fans of the show, as Mrs. Stoddard, “Indeed, Victoria Winters was my daughter.”

It was in Episode 97 that we began to piece together that Mrs. Stoddard was impregnated by a butler at the manor named B. Hanscom. This would have happened before she married Mr. Stoddard, who was the father of her daughter Carolynn. She might have been quite young when this happened. We are left to guess about that. Her brother had been away at school during this time and the baby girl was sent off to a foundling home. In the years afterward, Mrs.Stoddard sent her a little money every month before she invited her to come and be the governess to David.

Now, this may seem very cruel and, of course, it is, but it is a reflection of how life really was for women not long ago. In fact, I know people that something very similar to this happened to. If a young girl was impregnated, there was no possibility of abortion, and she was forced to bear the child in secrecy and then it would be sent to an orphanage or put up for adoption.

We  never know what happened to B. Hanscom, only that a relative of his from a painting which looks a lot like Victoria Winters, left town and was not heard from, again. It is possible that the butler, having raped a young member of the household, went on the lamb or perhaps he was dealt with in some other way. We don’t know and this storyline, itself, is so scandalous that it is only hinted at in Episode 97. The scandalousness of it is further enhanced by the elevated social status of the Collins family. The family still derives its income from a fishing and canning business and such a scandal might have proved disastrous for the family business and their reputation.

Many other mysteries surround Mrs. Stoddard. She rarely leaves the house and she has not left the property in 18 years. Her daughter Carolyn is probably a little under 18-years old when the series begins. We learn that her father ran off and left her and her mother when Carolyn was a newborn.

Mrs. Elizabeth Stoddard

Mrs. Stoddard is the most powerful character of all in this first season.  (In the years afterward and especially in its last seasons, the show takes a lot of twists and turns, for instance, exploring less occult and more sci-fi tyes of themes, and introducing many new characters by the end of the series. By that time, the male characters are the most powerful, also, the most cruel and inhuman.)

Mrs. Stoddard is well-respected and has the ability to inspire great loyalty in the men who work for her, especially Bill Malloy, who is the manager of the Collins cannery and fishing fleet and Matthew, the groundskeeper. Both of these men are so loyal to her, in fact, that they would kill just to protect her from mental distress. When an enemy of the family turns up and tries to buy the workers in the Collins’ cannery, the men who work there refuse on the grounds that Mrs. Stoddard has provided them with steady, well-paid work for so long. Their loyalty stems from self-interest surrounding finances, but it is, also, suggested by Carolyn that Mr. Malloy might have a secret crush on her mother.

Mrs. Stoddard is the beneficiary of a fortunate birth in a fortunate time in which she is able to inherit her family’s wealth alongside her brother, Roger (played by Louis Edmonds). She may have inherited the greater part of the family’s fortune along with the responsibilities of running the family business since she seems to be a little older and more responsible than her brother. It is she who owns the house and the grounds and Collinwood. It is she who runs the business and provides her brother, who squandered his fortune, with both a job and a place to live. She wields the most power in the house and has the final say in all business and financial matters concerning the family’s assets.

But there are problems that go along with living in the “house on the hill,” which is coveted by almost every friend or foe of the family. There is a combination of respect and resentment toward Mrs. Stoddard from the townsfolk. Both Mrs. Stoddard and her daughter, Carolyn, are subject to predators and con men. In Mrs. Stoddards’ case, she has been conned by a team of con men involving her husband and his friend, Jason McGuire, who has been blackmailing her for years. When he comes back to town and tries to force her into a marriage against her will, we finally learn the truth along with Mrs. Stoddard, who for 18 years feared leaving the grounds because she had been convinced that she murdered her abusive husband and buried in a room in the cellar. But, there is no body in the cellar and her husband was never dead.

Carolyn Stoddard

Carolyn Stoddard is probably my favorite character in this first year. One of the reasons I like this character so much is because she is truly dynamic. She is young and has to grow up fast because of the goings on at Collinwood, which are both mundane and metaphysical in nature. Carolyn is very isolated. She has no social equal in Collinsport. She and her mother have been the subject of ridicule by Carolyn’s childhood peers, who laughed at the witch who never leaves the creepy, old haunted house on the hill.

Carolyn’s singular social status is a gilded cage. Although, Collinwood is no palace. It’s more like a large, ornate, Gothic-style tomb. It is dark, cold, and foreboding. Young, vivacious, golden-haired Carolyn, the contemporary teen, is a contrast to the stagnant timelessness and decay of Collinwood. When the series begins she is a mirror contrast to her secret half-sister, Victoria Winters, who dresses plainly, much like a librarian, and as suits her station as the governess to Roger’s son, David. Carolyn giggles like a common teenager. Her wardrobe vacillates between conservative classical styles and contemporary teen-aged styles with peg-leg pants, striped shirts, and sneakers.

The only “action” (a popular variety show followed Dark Shadows in 1966, called “Where the Action Is,” which featured acts like Hermans Hermits, Dick Clark, and Paul Revere and the Raiders) in Collinsport for young people is at the Blue Whale, a local watering hole featuring trademark rock ‘n’ roll music and a dance floor.

I don’t know what bars and taverns were like back in the 1960s in New England. In my time and in my part of the country, bars are not frequented by decent folks. (This may be regional. My grandfather was a tavern-owner and I was told that this fact may have been the source of some very nasty and perverse town rumors about me when I was a child. In very religious areas of the country like where I live, bars, taverns and the people who frequent them are looked down upon as sinners.) In the early episodes, we often see Carolyn dancing with men at the Blue Whale, often while her boyfriend, Joe, looks on in exasperation.

From the beginning Carolyn seems a little angry to me. Although, this character can certainly be read all kinds of different ways, which makes her all the more interesting. For instance, Joe and Burke Devlin describe her attitude as being one of “the belle of the ball.” Burke, a man old enough to be her father, seems to take some sort of satisfaction in taking her down a few notches in his quest for revenge against his rival Roger Collins and the entire Collins family.

Joe is frustrated that Carolyn won’t behave the way he thinks she should. Mrs. Stoddard wants Carolyn to marry Joe and he, also, seems to have nuptial intentions. Joe is favored by Mrs. Stoddard because, although he is a have-not, he is a hard worker with ambitions of buying his own fishing boat. It’s interesting that with all the Collins’ money, her mother never once suggests that she go away to study for a career, perhaps to take over the family business, at a nice university. Of course, if Carolyn went away to school, we wouldn’t have this interesting set of story lines surrounding her.

Like other fictional stories, the plot(s) relies on circumstances and actions that most sensible people would find a logical way around, but if we did without these things, all of which are a tutorial in how to complicate your life, then we wouldn’t have an interesting story. Examples of silly plot devices, which are a lesson in how not to live your life if you want to avoid complications, include basic things, such as, not:

  • Answering the door to anyone and everyone who knocks, without even bothering to inquire who it is
  • Answering the telephone every single time it rings
  • Accepting rides from men you barely know, don’t know at all, or whom you know well enough to know that they are hostile to your interests
  • Accepting invitations to the hotel rooms of men who fit any of the above descriptions and/or, also, have a criminal record
  • Visiting crumbling, apparently abandoned structures, especially alone at night
  • Visiting men, known or unknown to you, in a wide variety of other potentially deadly circumstances
  • Talking to the cops – ever

The women of Collinsport rarely, if ever, hesitate to do any of these things. They, also, fail to arm themselves in any way, no matter how frightened they become. Although, on, at least, two occasions Carolyn does threaten a couple of potential rapists with Uncle Roger’s revolver, which is kept in a drawer in the Drawing Room that is easily accessible by anyone.

carolynandjoanIf Carolyn is resistant to an eligible young suitor of her own age, she has very good reasons. After all, she is is young, has experienced nothing of what the world has to offer, and she is the daughter of a mother who was abandoned by her own husband, so she has a good reason to be leery of men. So, does her mother. Despite this, Mrs. Stoddard tries to push Carolyn together with Joe. She tells her that marrying Joe is an opportunity to escape this dark tomb, which is her ancestral home  – but, to what? What would Carolyn’s life have been like had she married poor, but ambitious and very blue-collar Joe?

Carolyn’s status and station in life, not to mention her lifestyle, would probably suffer quite a bit, if she married Joe. It’s easy to picture her living in a modest house with plaid, cotton curtains in the kitchen, standing over a hot stove, looking frumpy and frazzled while Joe is off conquering the world in his fishing boat and taking accolades from his buddies for having landed the rich shrew, the blonde whore in the haunted house on the hill, who is simultaneously coveted, envied, and hated.  There is still a lingering suspicion that Joe is a gold-digger, too. By marrying Carolyn, he would improve his station in life and, eventually, his finances to a very great degree. He would, also, be privy to the privilege and power the Collins family enjoys in the city founded by their own ancestors.

He would gain and she would lose by this union, as is traditionally the case for women in marriage. This must be in her mind, these images and these suspicions, along with all the whisperings from the have-nots in the town, which go on behind her back, but which she is yet acutely, unceasingly aware of. This is why I see Carolyn as angry. She has a good reason to be angry, anyway. Behind the facade of well-learned upper-class, long-suffering smiles and careless, girlish giggles, these things seem to be on her mind.

So, she resists Joe in rebellion against her mother and her mother’s ways. Instead, she embraces an enemy of the family, Burke Devlin, a man old enough to be her father, who spent five years in prison for manslaughter. But, Devlin isn’t a realistic suitor and, therefore, presents no real threat to her future. Devlin is both worldly and wealthy – unlike young, poor, uneducated Joe who knows only his trade.

Carolyn romanticizes Burke Devlin until she realizes that he really is trying to use her to harm her family. This reaches fever pitch when David’s mother, Laura, a witch who has a relationship to the mythical phoenix, returns to take him away. We learn that Burke Devlin may be David’s biological father, rather than Roger. Burke Devlin throws Carolyn over for Laura, but Carolyn doesn’t really begin to change until her mother becomes gravely ill with a condition the allopaths cannot diagnose or treat. At this point, Carolyn is must assume her mother’s responsibilities over the family’s assets.

Even Uncle Roger is forced to acknowledge her supremacy in the house as her mother’s heir. She decides to employ a parapsychologist, who uses a seance in order to learn the truth of her mother’s illness, which is, of course, the result of black magic perpetrated by Laura.

When Laura dies, Mrs. Stoddard recovers, but Carolyn is much different for this experience. She is changed in ways that Burke Devlin and Joe clearly do not understand, only seeing her in the ways the men see women, as objects devoid of individuality or humanity which are to be used as a means to an end. Devlin used Carolyn and Joe tried to – and in the next season when we go back in time, we see what Joe’s character is probably really like beneath the facade. He is, in fact, a gold-digger.

After this experience, Carolyn seems to lose her interest in men. From that point forward, we see that she understands how she is perceived by them and realizes the limitations of any relationship she might have with them, with the exceptions of the males in her immediate family – Uncle Roger and Cousin David. The only time she displays any interest in men is when she is trying to impress a point upon her mother or to obtain information, in which case, she uses her appearance and innuendo to manipulate the men by means of their mental weaknesses. In another instance, she is attacked by the vampire and becomes his unwilling servant.

Carolyn Stoddard may be the closest thing to a radical feminist in this show. Mrs Stoddard is a very powerful woman, but she still trusts men far too much, as evidenced by her faith in Joe. On the other hand, Carolyn sees the writing on the wall after what happened with Burke Devlin, who lied to her and used her, almost to the peril of her mother’s death. She is never the same after this experience. She is a quick learner. It would be good for all of us if we could study men so quickly and come to this conclusion at a young age.

Maggie Evans

beginnMaggie Evans is the first friend Victoria Winters made when she got off the train at Collinsport. Maggie works in the diner at the only (apparently) hotel in town. She serves up coffee, pie and gossip and may be seen as a mirror contrast to Carolyn Stoddard. Maggie, Carolyn and Vickie Winters are all about the same age. But, Maggie and Carolyn are never really friends, mostly because they never really cross paths with each other since they are in two very opposite social classes.

Maggie is a have-not from the town, whose mother is dead and whose father is a guilt-ridden, alcoholic, impoverished artist. Their relationship represents a role reversal in which she is more the parent and he is more like a child. They live in a simple, modest home. When Maggie is done working at the diner, she has to come home and prepare dinner for her Pop.

When Joe can’t land Carolyn, Maggie is his natural source of solace. Although, she has a good-heart, generally, she still assigns some unkind characteristics to Carolyn Stoddard and the entire Collins family. The source of this seems to be envy, since she does not really know Carolyn or her family.

Joe and Maggie are a much more likely match. Maggie can even recite all the different types of ships that sail on the high seas and she seems like a girl who bathes with plain soap and water and wears cotton dresses and sensible shoes. She is pretty, but not glamorous. She’s the kind of girl men marry, whereas Carolyn is the kind of girl men fuck and fuck over. This contrast between the two is very easy to spot.

A similar contrast between Carolyn and Vickie seems to exist, too, and eventually it is solid, practical Vickie that Burke Devlin proposes marriage to.

Overall, what I love about this series, especially this first year, is the focus on the female characters, especially the three younger ones. There is, also, the almost constant dark, moodiness of the show, which is only briefly relieved by the rock ‘n’ roll music at the Blue Whale. Despite all the horrors, there is something reassuring about it. It is some how gratifying to know that other people, perhaps these writers, do not see the world through rose-tinted glasses.

To illustrate why I think this show is so comforting, consider what I said in my previous post about supposedly wholesome family shows treating evil actions by men as comedy. In Happy Days when two men terrorize women in their bedrooms in the middle of the night, it’s humor. In Dark Shadows, when a man enters a woman’s bedroom with ill-intent, it is taken as a serious offence. Other people are concerned. Even men appear concerned and show compassion toward the victim instead of treating the event as a joke. It’s a fact that men enter women’s bedrooms with bad intentions while we are sleeping, but, at least, in Dark Shadows the men are sorry, they feel remorse, or they are punished and it is seen as a horrible act by others, rather than something light-hearted, not to be taken seriously. When the women on this show are terrorized by men and monsters (often the same thing), it is treated as a serious problem.

Barnabas Collins

2barnsDespite how good this show was, it was beginning to lose its audience, and in an effort to save it from cancellation, they decided to introduce a vampire into the story. Originally, this story line was only going to last for about 10 weeks, but the television-viewing public loved Barnabas Collins, and perhaps Jonathan Frid as that character. This not only saved Dark Shadows from oblivion, but it turned the show into a modern pop cultural phenomenon.

To fill in the gaps regarding the story lines of the show, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Shadows_(televised_storylines)

Barnabas, while protecting his own interests, brings to an end many of the problems plaguing Mrs. Stoddard, including the intrusion of Jason McGuire’s sleazy friend, Willy Loomis, and he, also, unwittingly avenges her against her blackmailer, McGuire.

barnandbrideHe becomes fixated on Maggie Evans, who is a dead ringer for his 18th century bride, Josette. He bites her, abducts her, and holds her captive in a prison cell in the basement of the Old House. The episodes depicting Maggie’s imprisonment as Barnabas Collins are metaphoric to domestic abuse commonly experienced by women at the hands of ordinary men. Barnabas insists on her learning her place as his bride. He takes away her identity by dictating her hairstyle and her clothing and tries to convince her that she is someone else, a person with a different name: Josette Collins. (When this is done to prisoners of war, it’s called “brainwashing.”) When she resists, he tortures her. He threatens his servant, Loomis, when he tries to intercede on her behalf to keep him from killing her. When Maggie finally escapes, Barnabas calls her back to him and holds her captive, again, this time insistent that he will kill her if she does not conform to his ideals of how she should look and behave. (This is exactly how men treat women, especially women who look like the women in porn because we are expected to behave in specific ways that men expect from us, but which are not natural to female human beings. When we do not meet these expectations, they become violent and punishing.)

This is all a metaphor to marriage and the domestic abuse that commonly takes place in it in which women lose their identities, forget their former selves, their friends, and even their family as they become imprisoned and isolated by the men who claim, as Barnabas does, to love their victims. Women who fail to conform to the man’s expectations are brutalized until they are dead or lose control of their own minds. Attempts at escape fail because the abuser is never far behind and the victim is mentally and physically weakened, often through repeated rapes (metaphorically, the draining of her blood), which destroy her life force, which is the seat of the lower will (this is the physical aspect of the will as opposed to the mental will), rendering her unable to get power over her legs.This is a literal feeling that is experienced by victims after rape, which render us unable to run from our attackers. We are paralyzed not only by fear of further violence, but by this loss of energy, a condition not recognized by Western medicine, but understood in other systems of medicine (including American Indian and Chinese medicine).

When Loomis, now Barnabas’ unwilling servant, tries to warn Maggie, he is accused of entering her bedroom to harm her. He is arrested and physically and mentally incapacitated for a while. Eventually, Maggie Evans is driven mad by Barnabas and ends up in a sanitarium.

loveA psychiatric doctor, Julia Hoffman, tries to help her, however, she falls under Barnabas Collins’ spell, too. In brief, this story line, in which Barnabas repeatedly strangles Julia and eventually tries to kill her, yet Julia insists that he can be cured of his vampirism, illustrates women’s relentless faith in the possibility of redemption for men, despite the fact that they are attacking, abusing, and trying to kill us (and, in many cases, succeeding at this). Julia sticks by Barnabas, believing in his humanity despite every monstrous thing he does, every murder he commits, and every threat he poses to her own life. Julia might be considered as an example of a liberal feminist because she believes that if only the evil influences were removed from men (e.g. the white man’s racial oppression, the Jewish manipulation, the influence of porn, the influence of violent video games, and so on with excuses ad nauseam), they could be human, they could learn not to rape and kill women and girls. As a scientist and doctor, she is trained to look at the facts – or supposed to be, anyway – yet, she repeatedly ignores the evidence and all the facts where Barnabas is concerned.

The vampire’s thirst for blood is a metaphor for sex, according to Dark Shadows writer, Joseph Caldwell. But, this is only a man’s perspective because for the female victims of this “sex,” who are unwilling, who must be tricked, cornered and trapped, placed in a trance, essentially drugged by the vampire’s bite, and who, if they survive the attack, are rendered weak and unable to act normally, under their own power, this is not “sex,” at all – it is rape. So, the vampire is a metaphor, instead, for the rapist. His blood drinking is a metaphor for his theft of women’s life force by means of rape. This may be why vampire movies, and horror movies, in general are almost therapeutic for victims of rape and other forms of male violence. Watching them is a way of coping with real-life horror, which is far, far worse than anything these writers could dream up in their fictional worlds. But, you can see how this horrific male violence against women is trivialized by men, in the words of one of the writers, himself – it’s sex. It is representative of eroticism rather than unspeakable – literally unspeakable – deadly, every day, as common as oxygen, male violence against women and girls. The vampire, like the rapist, has some control over who he attacks and when he attacks them. He only attacks when he knows he’s likely to get away with it. He seeks out the most vulnerable victims and those with whom he has developed a sick obsession. The vampire is a stalker, a pre-meditated sexual predator. He has the power to drive his victims insane or, at least, to make them appear crazy. The vampire, like the rapist, destroys his victims lives, murdering their spirits without completely killing their bodies. The rapist, like the vampire, appears as a gentleman, sometimes he’s a member of your own family – at the very least he appears normal and you never know he’s a vampire until that moment when he first tries to kill you. Furthermore, if you try to tell anyone that he is, in fact, a vampire (or a rapist), no one will believe you. They never do until maybe after there is a long trail of bloody victims and it’s far too late.

Still liberal feminists, like Dr. Hoffman, believe in redemption for metaphoric vampires. Julia gives up her paid work, her entire career, in fact, to help Barnabas, to serve him at her own expense and at great risk of physical danger (Barnabas is a classic domestic abuser), to redeem him, to gain his love (an illusion, since he’s a demon in the flesh), to cure him, to make him like herself, to mold him in her own image of humanity and compassion. So, she protects him. She lies for him. She covers up his crimes. She works side by side with him, imagining that he is or could be her equal and, all the while, he is only using her for his own secret, evil motivations. Is this not the very picture of a liberal feminist?!

The story of the return of Barnabas Collins from the grave is the subject of, at least, two movies, one of which I recommend and the other I cannot. The movie, House of Dark Shadows (1970), reprised this story line pretty faithfully, although more succinctly and more graphically. Some horror fans say that this was the best vampire movie of the 1970s. I wouldn’t go that far (I have other favorites – one obscure one, but I like it better, is called “The Vampire,” which starred Richard Lynch), but I definitely recommend it. Fairly recently (2012), there was an unfortunate remake by Tim Burton, starring Johnny Depp, called simply “Dark Shadows,” which I cannot recommend, unless you just want an excuse to throw things at your television screen. In the video, below, the vampire movie reviewer, Maven of the Eventide, explains everything that went stupidly wrong with this film. It’s far better than the movie, itself:

Genesis: The Return to the Year 1795

This is the final major story line of the series that I will address in this post. There are many more, but this one explains the mysterious legacy of the Collins family, its ghosts, the family vampire, and other unusual occurrences surrounding them. It is a revelation of the genesis of the vampire.

This story line is initiated by a seance, which is being held in the drawing room of the manor at Collinwood with the aim of contacting the spirit of a little 8-year old girl in period clothing, who first appears to play with David. She is soon seen by other members of the household. They believe that Sarah may be able to provide them with information about the strange things that are going on.

Every time a seance is held at Collinwood – and they hold quite a few, which is absolutely delightful! – it seems that Victoria Winters has some kind of classic trance mediumship experience. In one instance, the spirit of Josette speaks through her in her native French language, even though Vickie does not speak French. On another occasion, she experiences what Josette Collins experienced emotionally and visually the night she went over the edge of the cliff at Widow’s Hill.

On this occasion, something more surprising happens: Vickie goes into a trance and collapses. When she is roused, we see that it is no longer Victoria Winters sitting at the table, but another woman who is from another time, as evidenced by the fact that she is wearing period clothing. In the present time, Victoria Winters is only gone for only a few minutes. But, she has traveled back in time to to Collinwood in the year 1795 and what takes place then encompasses a long series of thrilling episodes – in my opinion, the very best of the entire series.

Victoria Winters has traded places with the 18th century governess for the little girl, Sarah. When she arrives at the door of the Old House, she is dressed in contemporary 1967 clothing and carrying a large book, which contains the modern record of the Collin’s family history. She is greeted by Jeremiah Collins,  who looks just like her recently deceased fiance, Burke Devlin (now played for some time by a different actor, Anthony George).

When she arrives in 1785, we see that all of the actors are playing characters that are either complementary to or in contrast to their 20th century ones. For instance, Louis Edmonds (Uncle Roger) is now playing the role of the stern and powerful old family patriarch, Joshua Collins, whose portrait is hung over the mantle in the drawing room. We see that Joan Bennet (Mrs.Elizabeth Stoddard) is playing the role of Joshua’s demure, powerless wife. Although Barnabas Collins is the original Barnabas, he is their son. He is betrothed to Josette duPres (Cathryn Scott Leigh, who plays Maggie Evans in the 20th century), a titled French noblewoman, whose arrival with her entourage is anxiously awaited.

On this same day, they are, also, expecting the new governess, however, when Victoria Winters arrives at the door, confused and wearing strange clothing, she is quickly accused by Abigail Winters (Clarice Blackburn, who played the Collin’s housemaid, previously), the sister of Joshua and Jeremiah Collins, of being a witch. It is she who calls in the terrifying witch finder, Reverend Trask (played by Jerry Lacy, who previously played a 20th century lawyer), who terrorizes Vickie by tying her to a tree to determine whether or not she is a witch. Afterward, she is imprisoned and put on trial for witchcraft.

In fact, many strange things are happening at Collinwood, which are, indeed, the work of a witch, however, it not Victoria Winters, but Angelique Bouchard (Lara Parker), who is the servant of Josette duPres, a member of her entourage who all arrived on the same day as Vickie. Angelique is the poor daughter of a Voodoo priestess from the island of Martinique.

cd4f1e6006e320c96ff425199d01ddf3Soon after the arrival of the entourage, we see a revelatory scene between Angelique and Barnabas, in which we learn that during the course of his courtship of Josette, which began at Martinique, he toyed with the affections of the servant girl. While Josette is a woman of a class, at least, equal to his own (she is titled, however, and this is controversial, especially to these American revolutionaries), he is tempted, perhaps by the power imbalance, itself, to seduce Angelique. Men tend to do these things when they think they can get away with them and they choose situations in which there is a great power imbalance. The power imbalance seems to be some sort of aphrodisiac!

He wants to keep this indiscretion between the two of them. Above all, he does not want Josette to find out. Naturally, Angelique is upset by being used and cast aside. But, far from being the powerless servant girl Barnabas thought she was, she turns out to be in possession of a very powerful occult knowledge and force.

If Barnabas had chosen to have an illicit affair with a common, powerless servant, then there would be no story here. She would have gone away quietly, without any other options. But, Angelique is resolute and determined to get what Barnabas promised her. She wants to be his wife. So, she begins to manipulate the residents and other guests of Collinswood by means of witchcraft.

In his own mind, his mistake was not so much deceiving a servant girl, but deceiving one who turned out to be a witch! This idea is repeated quite often by him. He blames Angelique for cursing him to become a vampire, so that whoever he loves he must kill. He never once blames himself for his own unethical actions against her. He only blames her and, in fact, everyone in this story who knows the secret of the curse blames Angelique. Furthermore, Angelique only placed this terrible curse on him after he shot and mortally wounded her! Still, he rages at Angelique, never seeing his own role in his downfall.

After Barnabas is bitten by a bat, initiating the vampire curse, he falls ill and doctors suspect it is the plague. His father Joshua insists on keeping his death a secret and he is placed in a coffin in a secret room of the family mausoleum. It is falsely written in the family history that Barnabas went away to England. It turns out that many things written in the history are wrong.

During the course of this story line, a rogue soldier named Nathan Forbes (Joel Crothers, who played Joe) courts Millicent Collins (Nancy Barrett who plays Carolyn Stoddard), who is a wealthy heiress. Millie marries the fortune-hunter, Forbes, but before she does, she signs all her wealth over to her younger brother Daniel (David Henesy, who played Cousin David). When Forbes learns about this he drives her insane and plans to kill Daniel in an effort to gain control of her fortune.

Soon after, Barnabas Collins goes on a rampage, murdering and terrorizing into insanity the members of his own family before his father finally chains him into his coffin in the secret room of the mausoleum. Only Joshua and David survive to become the roots of the modern Collins family tree.

Simultaneously, Victoria Winters is still on trial for witchcraft. Despite the best efforts of her defense team, she is unable to successfully defend herself against Reverend Trask’s charges and is hanged. At the moment of her death, her spirit is transported back to modern day Collinsport and the original governess is hanged in her place.

This story line is a kind of Garden of Eden theme telling the origins of man/vampire, in which Angelique represents a forbidden temptation, woman, who is the cause of all of mankind’s suffering. It is a spin on one of men’s oldest surviving works of fiction, Genesis.

The results of this original work of horror fiction, Genesis, are the centuries of men’s witch hunts against women and women’s culture, women’s science, women’s medicine, women’s ways, and women’s power.

Witchcraft and the women who practice it are a threat to the order of things, to men’s power, to the status quo, to man’s laws, and his conceptions of the world.

Being called a witch, being accused of sexual desires (even as children) and sexual offences, are matters that still hang over all our heads. Men are not sorry for the horrors they perpetrate against women. Furthermore, anytime men choose, they could begin the witch hunts, again. If a repeat of the so-called “Burning Times,” sounded far-fetched 20 years ago (and it did to me), it sounds much more plausible today. You need only look at the words of white supremacists online to see how much they hate white women, how they accuse us the same way they did centuries ago, to see how this happened in the past and how it could happen, again. Even as the white male entertains thoughts of reparations for black men, some of whom he enslaved long ago, he never gives one thought to the horrors he continues, to this very day, to perpetrate against the women who gave him life.

This last story line is not so much metaphorical as it is absolutely straightforward in its revelations of man’s inhumanity to woman and his continuing accusations against us along with his perpetual fear of our power and of what we will do to him once we get the upper hand. There will be Hell to pay – just as Barnabas paid for his crimes against the original woman of this story, Angelique, who set the rest of the family’s strange legacy in motion.

Was Angelique a Feminist?

angeliqueThe character, Angelique, possessed great strength and she was one of the most popular characters on the show. She was loved by many young girls in the mid-sixties, when feminism was experiencing a strong resurgence, who wished they had her power. Angelique had the power to confront and defeat men and, in fact, anyone else who got in her way. But, the character was not a feminist one by a long shot.

What makes Angelique a non-feminist is her obsession with a man, Barnabas. If she had used her power for herself, to better herself, to attain independence from men, then she could be seen as a feminist. But, Angelique was the opposite. She was both the temptress and the scapegoat, neither of which are positions of power.

As I pointed out in a previous post on the subject of witches in movies, it is almost always the case that women with power must use it to help men. Those who do this are the good witches like Samantha Stevens of Bewitched. But, those who use their power for their own ends, even when such use is perfectly justified, are the bad witches. Bad witches must be punished – they must die or they must be sent to an insane asylum. Angelique is an example of a particularly bad witch who is driven, not by a desire for power of self-improvement, but by the sexual desire for a man.

Could it be that Angelique wanted to marry Barnabas, which she did in the 1795 story line, in order to attain a position of social status? But, why does a witch need social status? Furthermore, if she wanted to attain such status, could she not find a way to achieve this without involving an obsession with the male form? I can think of half-a-dozen possibilities for doing so in a matter of seconds, all of which might have made a good storyline, but would not have suited this or any other fictional story written by men, to suit the ends of men, because it involves women doing things that do not revolve around men.

Men simply cannot stand this idea. That is why Angelique is not a feminist. She would never have been written as a feminist because in order for that to happen, she would have had to have a life and ambitions that revolved around something that wasn’t a man.

According to Lara Parker, in the video below, some young women in the 1960s seemed to be confused about what feminism is and mistook Angelique for a feminist role model. It’s safe to say that many – perhaps most – women (and virtually all men) are now more confused than ever about what it means to be a feminist. If Angelique could be considered a feminist, at all, she would have to be a liberal feminist (liberal feminists are far more liberal than they are feminist!) although they are no more feminist than Angelique because, like this character, they concentrate their efforts on changing men, on re-training men not to be rapists/monsters/vampires, on trying to re-socialize men and re-make them in their own image. Liberal feminists are nominative feminists only. It is easy to see how Angelique might be considered one of them, except that she was subject to a male power. She had a male overlord, who gave her the powers she had to do evil. Therefore, Angelique fails the test completely and could not really be considered any kind of feminist because, not only is she obsessed with a man, she is unable to act independently, under any power of her own.

 

Additional material:

Director, Lela Swift, discusses the supernatural themes of the show and the vampire’s mystique:

 

Three favorite cast members, Edmonds, Scott, and Frid, appear on Good Morning American to discuss Dark Shadows in 1987:

 

Television tropes in Dark Shadows: http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Series/DarkShadows

 

The Push to Normalize Pedophilia and the Demonic Male

I was going to do separate posts about each of the two subjects in the title: The incessant male sexual perversion we female human beings are surrounded by and the demonic male. But, I have trouble separating these two subjects, anyway, and then I read a post by NoMorePaperTowels, entitled “Being Able to Say ‘No’ is Sexual Freedom, ” which is a rational refutation of an article, “Will the Left Turn on Sexual Freedom,” by Damon Linker.

Before I get to the substance of her article, I’d like to mention what stood out to me about this dudebro’s name. I laughed out loud when I read this guy’s name, which could be a pen name or maybe it’s really his legal name. But, I have noticed that men often tell us what they are in little ways. I’ve had men say, “I’m an onasshole,” under their breath while I was on a date with them, years ago, and this was my clue that they were plotting some evil against me, that some horrible, violent thoughts were going through their minds. They seem to get off on giving us clues about themselves and their motives, sometimes it’s subtle, sometimes it’s more direct.

This guy’s name says what he is. “Damon” is an old name from Greek, which means “subduer” or “subjugater.” His last name, “Linker,” is a term frequently used in the German news these days to describe “lefties” or “left-wingers.” So, this guy’s name means “left-wing subjugater.” This made me laugh. Then, I clicked on the link to the article and there is a picture of this guy. Now, “Damon,” sounds a lot like “Demon,” and if you look at this guy’s picture and just pull away from your computer screen a little bit, he’s got little tufts of hair on each side of his head that – I swear! – look like devil-horns! LOL!

Men really are telling us who and what they are, if we only observe and listen!

Back to NMPT’s post, which is a commentary on an article written by the demonic left-wing subjugater: NMPT points out that, once again, women are not being regarded as human beings with basic human and civil rights with respect to being able to say “No” to sexually predatory males. Saying the word, “No,” to men and to contact with men is, in fact, sexual freedom. The men regularly argue that we should not be able to refuse contact with them because it is a violation of men’s rights to sex. This concept of men’s rights to sex and sexual rights, in general, is rife with problems and we are seeing the idea put forth more and more with regard to such issues as Amnesty’s International’s Refusal to acknowledge women and girls as human beings with a right not to be trafficked and prostituted, with the legally sanctioned intrusion of males into female safe spaces such as restrooms and locker rooms, and with the push to lower the legal age of consent and promote pedophilia. The push may appear to be coming from the left, but it is both the left-wing and the Christian conservatives who are pushing it. Again, the problem isn’t really left or right, it isn’t a race or even a religion, but it is MEN who are doing this.

The demonic left-wing subjugater seems to be very confused about a few things in his article. Not only does he fail to understand that women are human beings, but he uses the term, “moral libertarianism,” over and over. First of all, the idea behind Libertarianism is morality. I tried to look up the term, “moral libertarianism,” and could not find a definition. It is possible that the author is confusing the term “Libertarianism” with “libertinism.” This seems to be the case, although, his confusion carries over into his politics and he, also, refers to Rand Paul as a Libertarian. Paul is a Republican and has publicly stated that he is not a Libertarian. His father ran on the Libertarian ticket for president back in the 1990s, but he is a poor representative of the party’s platform.

The Libertarians have suffered, in the past few decades, from an influx of men who are very good at recognizing the  civil rights of men, but very bad at recognizing that those same rights apply to women. This is a problem among Republicans and Democrats, as well. All three of these parties are dominated by men. The author of the original article says that Libertarians have “a laissez-faire attitude toward sex.” I don’t know what he thinks that means. What it does mean is that Libertarians do not believe in trying to legislate sexual behaviors, in general. Although, it is a major tenet in Libertarianism that you can do what you want as long as you don’t violate the rights of others. So, not legislating the sexual behavior of adults does not mean that it’s okay to rape women and children – which is how the author of the article seems to view this statement.

I can only assume based on the context of the rest of the article he wrote that the author is actually talking about “moral libertinism,” which is an absolute contradiction in terms. A libertine is a man who is devoid of moral or sexual restraint. So, let me make a quick list of the things this guy has gotten wrong so far:

  • He thinks women have no right to say “No” because it interferes with men’s sexual freedom.
  • He thinks the Republican, Rand Paul, is a Libertarian despite the fact that Paul has repeatedly denied this and his political views reflect that he is, in fact, not a Libertarian.
  • He thinks that “Libertarian” and “libertine” are somehow equivalent terms and uses them as such after the introductory paragraphs of his article.

When I go back and read the article using the term “libertinism” in place of his “libertarianism” it begins to make slightly more sense. Although, I am still unclear on what is moral about immorality. This is an oxymoron. I re-read the article and when I got to the conclusion I was still baffled by what he is trying to say here, but I do see that he is speaking about “morality” from an entirely male perspective. Thank goodness I have NMPT to sort it out for me. It’s like having a translator. She is translating his Liberalese into something I can understand. But, it’s more than just Liberalese – this is men’s language, it’s all coming from a semen-drenched point-of-view, which is, also, why it is baffling.

The Push for Sexual Rights: The Dangers are Becoming More Evident

To me “sexual rights for all” is a lot like “patriarchal health care for all” or “freedom to worship God whichever way you choose.” These ideas are all prisons.

The idea that we all must have a sexual “orientation” is pushed – not having sexual contact is not an option, at least, not for girls and women. It’s an old sales trick. When you want someone to buy what you’re selling, you don’t give them the option to say, “No.” What you do is present them with a dichotomy: Are you heterosexual or homosexual?

This is what they started doing, in my memory, back in the 1990s. When I was in school, nobody talked much about homosexuality. “Gay” was just a word to call someone, often as a joke. I didn’t know what a lesbian was, had never even heard the term before, until probably my senior year in high school (1983 or 1984) and then I had only a vague idea. Then, I saw the media and the public schools pushing homosexuality. I remember catching a glimpse of a television show in which the teacher stood before a class and wrote on a chalkboard that we are all a little bit homosexual. He presented a chart that looked like a gasoline gauge and he asked the students to consider where they fell on this sexuality chart. This idea became prevalent – that we are all a little bit homosexual and if we deny that, we are homophobic. (Does this sound, at all familiar?! Say, “No,” to men and you are some kind of phobiac.)

What is not allowed is the possibility for women or girls to say, “No, I do not hunger for dick, neither do I have sexual urges for other girls or women.” The girls and women – who quite likely, if they were anything like me and Shere Hite’s work suggests that most are – are probably confused about what the term “sexuality” really means in anything other than an academic sense.

When you are doing sales work, you might present your prospect with more than two options. Again, this does not give them the opportunity to say, “No,” and, if they object, you have a scripted response to their objections to put them back on the track where you want their thinking to go. In sales, we don’t want to overwhelm our prospect with options or else they might walk away, but we can present them with some other ideas to sell the idea that sexuality is inherent to all, desirable for all, that there must be sexual freedom for all – although, we’ve already determined that this does not include the option to say, “No.”

So, they began to present different options: Are you bi-sexual? Are you bi-curious? Are you a trans-sexual? 

And, now, it goes on, they are adding more options: What gender are you? Then, there is a long list of supposed genders. Along with these there is a wide range of sexual orientations.

One of the new sexual orientations is “pedophile.” There is a huge push to normalize this as simply part of “sexual freedom for all.” Of course, it does not consider the child in the “all” anymore than women are considered as part of the “all.”

This hyper-sexualized, sperm-drenched world we are living in is the true meaning of “It’s a man’s world.”

We have all been “pitched” this idea by some master salesmen, some men who have mastered psychology and how people respond. They know how to overcome your objections and, of course, where women and girls are concerned, that includes violence! It includes social and religious coercion. It starts young.

To continue the analogy I made at the beginning to this idea of “sexual freedom for all” being like religion and patriarchal medicine, if you object to these other two ideas, you will get a similar salesman-like response.

For instance, I have had religious people tell me that “freedom of religion” does not include “freedom from religion.” Here in the states, this is usually a reference to our 1st Amendment, which does guarantee, in fact, freedom from religion. But, religious people will just give you a belligerent, nonsense response like that and stick with it – it’s the equivalent of calling someone a homophobe or a transphobe because they don’t want to engage in sexual behaviors, they want to keep their vaginas and other body parts to themselves. This is not an option.

In the case of Obamacare or universal health care, you get a zombie-like response from people that health insurance is a right, which makes no sense. Insurance companies do not have a right to anyone’s money simply because they say so. Even when you state your very valid objections to allopathic medicine. They will insist that their medical system is the only legitimate one and you must pay for them to use it. Since a lot of the people who object to allopathic medicine, the vocal ones, anyway, are Christians who believe in faith healing, you will likely be brushed off as a religious kook. This is a way for them to refuse to look at the facts, to think only about their own selfish motives and absolve themselves, in their own minds, from this responsibility. In a similar way, we are all pre-supposed to have sexual desires, especially girls and women are expected to have sexual desires for boys and we are not allowed to opt out. Like master salesmen, they simply refuse to hear our objection – our “No.”

When people – most people – think they have only one or two options, they will either comply or choose one of the options presented. Presenting people with a bunch of options, all of which are options you want them to choose and none of which are “No” or “I opt out” is a classic sales technique. It is manipulation and it is mind control.

What is “Morality” to Males?

Let me being by telling you what “morality” means to me as a woman. I’m, also, going to talk about what “morality” means within Libertarianism, since the demonic left-wing subjugater is trying to confuse people about this.

To me, morality is simply what is “right.” This is pretty much inherent, at least, in women. The laws and religious rules that have been set up are there to govern the predatory behavior of males toward females. The rules exit to mitigate male perversion.

To me, stealing is an example of something that is morally wrong. I don’t need a religious organization or a government entity to tell me this. But, men – who are the biggest class of thieves on this planet, who steal mostly from women – do need these laws and rules. They don’t enforce them well or at all most of the time, but they do have such rules and laws and this is why.

This is something I figured out years ago: The laws are there to control them. The “them” being the demons in the flesh – males. I really believe that if we had a nation or a society made up of entirely or mostly women, we would not need many or any laws.

Within the philosophy of Libertarianism, which really is more of a philosophy than it is a political party in many ways, morality stems from the basic concept of “right and wrong,” which is believed to be best represented by the U.S. Constitution. A whole lot of our law was based on the Magna Carta and Anglo-Saxon Common Law, which pre-dates Christianity and has a foundation in the basic concept of fairness. It means, for instance, we don’t steal from each other through taxation or other fraud. It means we don’t perpetrate acts of violence on other people. It means we do have a right to self-defense. And, we have a fundamental right to our property (the right to private property is a major concept in Libertarianism), which includes our own bodies.

Somehow, the demon left-wing subjugater seems to have the idea that Libertarianism is about Sex, Drugs & Rock ‘n’ Roll and this is not the case. It is, however, the natural interpretation of what I just said by a perpetually horny male who never graduated from adolescence.

“Morality” to men, more often than not, centers on their patriarchal religious establishments. They see everything in relation to the male and the male God,  who they invented and who is a reflection of their own degradation. Even men who say they are atheists hold this point of view. Even male Satanists see freedom from god as freedom from moral behavior as I described it above. They see it as license to harm other people, especially women and girls – and sometimes little boys.

We run up against this problem in paganism and it is something that has been discussed before. When you have men come into a group of pagan women, they usually see it as an opportunity to practice “libertinism” upon the women in the group – flirting, playing class clown, pawing and groping, and sometimes devising rituals or other situations in which they can sexually coerce or outright attack the women. In fact, every group starting with Gerald Gardner’s Wicca and moving on through LaVeyan Satanism and I have no idea what is going on now that I don’t want to know about – we see that men prey upon women’s liberation from Christianity. They take it as an opportunity to do more sexual harm in the name of either sexual freedom or religious freedom.

Male “morality” centers on the opportunity to fuck women and little girls. In their filthy, degenerate book, The Holy Bible, it says that men and women are to “go forth and multiply.” There are other passages about “storing treasure in heaven,” which the Quiverfull movement takes to mean providing bodies to souls and this is a way to acquire “credit” in the afterlife with God. The Mormons believe that the faster the women reproduce the sooner the Lord Jesus Christ will return to reign over them – they long for the apocalypse, which is why they are hell-bent on out-reproducing the Catholics. The Catholics do it ostensibly because they believe that sex for any other purpose than reproduction is a sin against God – that is you’re not supposed to do it recreationally. Again, this is obviously an edict for the males because it has been established (by Shere Hite, for which she was run out of the country) that most women do not derive pleasure from PIV (penis in vagina) sex. The real reason these perverts want to produce more children is because they are violent sex perverts who have sick urges to do violent things to children, especially little girls. But, more about this at a later time.

What is immoral to us is moral to men.

It is moral for men to have access to women and girls to fuck. The Bible says so. It says how to fuck us, when to fuck us, and details what is and what is not pleasing in the eyes of their perverted God character with regard to raping us. It blames us for not fighting back hard enough, for not crying out, for not choosing suicide – which they say is a mortal sin at any other time – over being fucked by a man.

Nobody ever asks our opinion about this because we are not allowed to have one. We are not allowed to opt out. Even when we scream, “No, ” we are not heard. Man’s focus remains on his dick and his sick perversions, which he projects on to women and little girls. He wants to fuck women and little girls, therefore, he believes that women and little girls want to be fucked by men. You will not be given the option to state your objection and even if you do you will be beaten down, called “slut” and “whore, be pelted with accusations and abuse. Men insist on putting their filth on women and girls.

When we are heard at all by men, from the male perspective, we have no validation because we are “immoral.” Our objections to having semen smeared on us and dicks poked into our orifices are deemed “immoral.” From his perspective, we are defying God. Our refusal to sexually submit, to be enslaved by males is a sin.

This applies even to atheist and Satanist males because they still believe that females are here to be sexually harmed by men, for their use and abuse as livestock, slaves, and vessels, and if we resist, we are doing something unnatural and wrong.

Furthermore, everything we do or don’t do with regard to males is taken as “consent” to their violence.

The Patriarchal Belief that Little Girls are Sexual Beings

The first sin was a sexual sin, according to the dominant religion. Although, there is some disagreement about what exactly happened. An earlier echo of the Biblical story says that Adam’s first female sex slave was Lilith, but she refused to be penetrated by his dick from underneath and wanted to be on top during sexual intercourse. Lilith does not object to dick, altogether, but just being on the bottom. She wants to be on top and this is evil, thus saith the Lord. So, she got in a snit, sprouted wings, and flew off to a mountain top where she had endless sex with all kinds of demons (demons must have dicks, I think it’s safe to say) and so God had to provide Adam with a second woman named Eve.

Eve, too, was an evil sexual temptress, who offered Adam an apple from a forbidden tree. This is often presumed to mean that she offered him her body to stick his dick in. At any rate, Eve is responsible for the so called “fall of man.” And, she is responsible for every other evil, horrible thing a man has ever done to her, her children, or this planet, thus saith the Lord. Because of Eve’s sexual insatiability, all girls are cursed and doomed to be a servant or “hand maiden” to a male. We are forbidden to speak during church meetings. We are accused of practicing witchcraft, as if it were a bad thing, and, of course, of desiring to be fucked by men – sometimes just one man and sometimes lots of men.

Christians (I don’t know about Jews or Muslims but that whole genital mutilation/bris thing makes me thing they have similar ideas and, of course, Judaism is the foundational religion to both Christianity and Islam) believe that little children are born with “sin.” They must be baptized so that these original sins of Eve will be washed away. There is a lot of discrepancy with regard to how soon or how late a child should be cleansed of this sin, though.

With the Mormons, it is quite late. They say 8-years old. With the Catholics and some others, the child must be saved by God, shortly after birth. The reason is that the child, unsaved, is in the hands of Satan and they believe it is Satan who acted through Eve. They, also, have a lot of writing about how girls and women are easily subject to Satan and are instruments of Satan.

In the churches, which are havens for pedophiles, it is believed that little girls tempt men to do sexually violent things to them. It is believed that the little girls, even little baby girls are temptresses, agents of the Living Devil, who work to bring down good men by means of their dicks.

This is one foundation for pedophilia in our society.  (I speak of the U.S. because it is what I know. I’m sure it applies equally well to other countries.) This is why the churches are rife with pedophiles and all manner of male perverts.

This is probably why when people hear about the results of studies like the ones conducted by Alfred C. Kinsey, they are willing to accept the idea that little girls (and I speak of little girls because I once was one and I know nothing of little boys except that they do act out with sexual violence against girls at a young age – again, because I experienced this) are temptresses, full of sexual desires, longing to be fucked by males.

They believe this because “God” said so and if they don’t buy into that, then they believe it because “Science” said so. These are the same things – absolutely the same! – both invented by men to serve the purposes of males. Science and Religion are two sides of the same coin.

Both God and Science inform us that females were made for males, were made to be fucked by males, desire to be fucked by males, at least, as much as males want to fuck us. Women are a reflection of the male, they say. Women are the “other half” of men. Women need men, they say. We need each other, they say. We long for each other, they say. This is either God’s will or natural, according to which side of the coin you’re looking at.

Either way, girls want to be fucked by men, according to men.

Everything a girl does – even a little baby girl – is taken as evidence of her “sexuality” or her supposed desire to be fucked by men, if not  now, then at some later date, not too far off because someday soon, maybe at age 9 or maybe at age 12, she will have her first period, thus signalling her overwhelming desire to be fucked, all according to men.

I did a post about a sorority a while back, which was targeted by perverted males online and by liberals. A lot of things struck me about that story. It was the same sorority house that was allegedly targeted by Elliot Rodger (I now believe that story to be a staged hoax and I say why in some other posts here), but this was the Alabama chapter. The women were targeted in part because they are white and mostly blonde and because this is the group that is largely targeted by males for pornography. I found the story interesting, too, because liberals were commenting on it and saying that the girls looked like whores that they looked like Playboy bunnies and so on.

What bothered me so much about it was that I have an entirely different perspective, especially coming from a rural and fundamentalist religious upbringing. The concept that these young women really were just older girls (somewhere between girlhood and womanhood and probably very sheltered from things that highly sex menand many liberals take for granted) who were promoting their sisterhood, which looks like a big pajama party, was lost on a lot of men and libs. They innocently put the video out on YT and a bunch of fappers showed up and made violent and sexually disturbing comments on the video. Ultimately, the video had to be pulled and it seems like the girls got in some kind of trouble for it – of course.

There are portions of the video in which the girls are blowing glitter and beckoning at the camera for other girls to come and join their sorority. It’s an advertisement with a targeted audience – which was completely lost on the perverted males and the liberal males. To them these girls, who really are just innocent girls with an extended childhood, which they should be allowed to have, were pornography. They interpreted baggy, ragged, cut-off shorts worn at the lake to be “Daisy Dukes.” This is just how males view girls and women and this was a very public incident in which a bunch of men stole a portion of these young women’s innocence. They accused them of things that existed only the men’s own sick minds.

I think about this bunch of girls every now and then when I am here alone and I’m doing traditionally “girly” things. I think about it when I am taking care of my personal hygiene and appearance, when I’m dancing, or working out, or baking cupcakes with pink frosting, or sleeping in my satin sheets, or any number of other ordinary things that I do that I know would be interpreted by men – somehow! – as sexual, as being in relation to them and their dicks. Even though I am in complete solitude, I still have a sense of my activities somehow being interpreted as sexual submission or communicating a sexual desire for men. This is the sick program men put in our heads from the time we are little girls – they tell us every thing we do is about them.

This scrutiny of our behavior for indications of “asking for it” starts young, as does the training in femininity. I have so much femininity training that, frankly, I don’t know what is me and what is the training. I am often regarded as being prissy. I was always taught to sit up straight and to behave in certain ways and there are many things for little girls to know: How to sit in a dress; how to get in and out of a car properly, how to sit down properly at the dinner table; how to walk, how to stand, how to wait for a man to open the door. All these things are training.

We are, also, trained in such things as how to groom ourselves, how to wear our hair, how to apply make-up, how to dress properly.

So, if you are a disciplined and obedient female child, you do what you are told – as I did. In so doing, however, you are perceived by men as having a sexuality, as longing to be fucked.

If you want to see an example of this kind of thing, check out some clips or old episodes from a television show that ran on TLC (The Learning Channels, interestingly enough) called, “Toddlers and Tiaras.” The little girls are trained, from infancy in some cases, to learn to be sexually appealing to men. The little girls don’t know that this is what they’re being trained for – for men to fuck them – but, this is what is going on. The little girls are shown how to “shake it” even when they don’t even have the “it” (mammary glands) and how to wiggle their hips. The girls see these as dance moves (I know because I took tumbling and dance lessons and I was into my twenties before I realized that some of these motions had a sexual meaning – again, to men the have this meaning)  only as that, as motions in dance, the same way you do heel-toe and dosey-doe in some styles of dance.

This obedient and disciplined child, in the clip below, has no idea what she is being trained to do:

 

The child’s only desire is to please her parents – she does not have sexual desires. She would not even understand what that means. She is dependent on her parents and her entire life, her safety, her needs (needs meaning food, water and shelter – not sex) are wrapped up in doing as they say.

This is sexual grooming – done by the parents. It’s an example of what we’ve all been subjected to, either to a lesser or greater extent. What is appalling about this television program is we see sexual abuse of girls being promoted right in front of our eyes.

How do these fathers view their little daughters? Here’s an example:

 

You can bet that if he’s not doing it already that at some point he is going to project his sexual arousal onto his daughter. Religion and Science both say that she exists, not only to gratify the male and serve him, but that this is natural and due to her nature, whether sinful or biological, she wants desperately to be fucked by men. If she resists this, she’s a whore (acting against God and Nature), if she goes along with it, she’s a whore – just like the men said all along.

These little girls have their every move scrutinized on stage. We, as girls and women, have our every moves scrutinized by men from the time we are very young and throughout our whole lives by men who are looking for a sign or a signal that we want them to fuck us. They are looking for indications that she wants it. She has her hair in pigtails – that’s hot! – she wants it, they say.  She is wearing a pretty dress – she’s easy – it doesn’t matter that she’s 8 or 11 or 14 or 40. She’s eating ice cream or sucking on a lollipop – to the men, this is a sex act. They can only think of their dicks, even when it is a child. She’s walking away, “Shake it for me!” – because the male believes that literally every step she takes, that every action, every gesture, is a sign that she wants his dick in her.  This is true even when it is a little baby girl – this is when the scrutiny begins. Many, many times I have heard men talk about little baby girls this way. They interpret the child’s play or childish movements or the way her mother dressed her or taught her to behave as a come on. They think she wants it. This is now considered normal – apparently.

We have religion and Kinsey and the related institutions to blame for this, but mostly we have just MEN who are promoting this. Individual men promote this idea even within their own little nuclear slave units. They are pedophiles – maybe there is a better term, but this is the term that we all know what it means when we use it.

It’s men on the left and men on the right. It’s religious men, pagan men, and atheist men. It’s Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and any other political party created and dominated by men. It’s fathers, uncles, and brothers. It’s the sick bastard next door. It runs from the lowest specimen of the human male on the planet to the highest international players. It is institutionalized. It is codified and regulated. It is normalized.

Usually only when some girls end up dead – like Jon Benet Ramsey – does anybody take much notice, at all. Maybe raped and then murdered baby girls are what the demonic left-wing subjugater is referring to when he says we must have “moral libertinism” or “moral libertarianism,” whatever that actually means. Maybe only when girls are dead is this seen as going too far and I would guess that this is the case, since to men death is the ultimate, the thing they fear most. We women have other fears because most of us know what torture at the hands of men is. We understand what humanity and compassion are, too, and we have a concern about human suffering. This is something men seem to have no understanding of, whatsoever. They are, as Valerie Solanas said, “machines,” nothing more than “walking dildos.”

There is an effort, which I have only alluded to above – I have barely scratched the surface –  by men to normalize and legalize pedophilia. There is a lot of excusing pedophilia going on. There is a lot of saying that the pedophile is the true victim. There is an effort to define pedophilia as a sexual orientation by the same sick fucks that brought us the idea that we are all a little gay – this is where that ended up. Feminists who foolishly supported gay men’s rights thinking they would somehow profit from this contributed to this effort. Instead working to free women from men, they have reinforced the false notion of gender and they have reinforced the institution of marriage, which profits only males, and they laid the foundation for the rest of this perversion. Oh, and don’t think these perverts are going to stop there!

When the gays started pushing for gay rights, some people on the Xian right said this would lead to men marrying dogs and goats. They were laughed at. But, in fact, this is right where these people are going. They want to legalize the abuse of animals, too. And, don’t think that men abusing animals is a one-off because it isn’t. Men abuse animals all the time – they rape female animals.

The Demonic Male

I have tried for a very long time to figure out why this is happening. Why are males doing this to us? There is no materially based answer to this question. It is definitely not societal or cultural because it is simply male behavior across the board. This is discussed in the previous post and laid out in the terms of the scientific establishment by TrustYourPerceptions in her recent blog series. It is borne out by other evidence, as well.

The so-called civilization we have is centered around males and their struggle to maintain control over us. Their parasitism of us is the basis for pretty much everything they do, from the sexualization and sexual grooming of baby girls to their waging of war.

I can only tell you what I have seen and what I have experienced with regard to male behavior toward women and girls. I can tell you exactly what I have seen! It is my conclusion that men are not entirely human.

I’ve seen the question posed often, “Are women human?” This begs the question: “What is a human?”  The only answer I’ve been able to find about that is that the term means “ape man.” “Hu” means “ape.” If you look at men, this is how they appear – they look like some more primitive life form. They are, in fact, more basic. Their reproductive systems are very basic and so are their brains. They are less sophisticated in every way due to their endocrine systems.

It may be that we have been made into a vehicle for a certain type of spiritual being to obtain access to the physical world. This being, although he is our creation and our offspring, is very different from ourselves. He is a mutant. He is a DNA mutation – they Y chromosome being a mutation. He is a secondary being and, by his own reckoning, if you take into account how he wrote the stories of his genesis – an inferior being, since he is secondary and has no god-like creative powers.

I have survived many sexual assaults by men by acknowledging that they are not human beings. This has been a coping mechanism for me. (There’s a line in a song by Tina Turner, “Private Dancer,” in which she says, “You don’t think of them as human.”) After all, if we are humans, then what are they? They certainly don’t act like us, anyway, especially when they rape. They have lightning fast mobility – they can snatch you  like an alligator. The are silent, sneaking up from behind you, to attack. They are emotionless, lacking all compassion or any sense of humanity, in their attacks. Also, they are fond of biting – they literally try to eat our flesh and suck our blood in some of their attacks on us. In this way, men do not seem at all like women. They really do seem like some other type of life form.

The biting thing is very, very common. I have been bitten by men numerous times and one attacker bit me and tried to suck my blood – just like a vampire. He was a guy who mainly got off on beating up women and was a serial attacker. The dancers in the club, since they have insisted on them having closer physical proximity to the male predators, are not infrequently bitten by men. One woman I’ve seen had an entire set of teeth marks, upper and lower, on her breast from a man who bit her. Bill Clinton is notorious for biting women. He is supposed to have bitten a waitress along with some other women. Recently, Donald Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewendowski, was defended by a lawyer (in the case in which he grabbed Michelle Fields from behind and bruised her arm)  who is known for having bitten a woman in a night club.

Taking big chunks of flesh out of women’s bodies and sucking blood is not usually something we associate with human beings. So, if they are human, then what are we?

Similarly, with rapists – if they are human beings, then what are we?

Men will defend other men for these actions and it’s because they all have some understanding of themselves in relation to us, which we don’t really have.

They literally see us as food. They call us “honey” and “sweetie” and talk about how we taste. This is because we are livestock.

Fathers who abuse their daughters do so for the same reason. They know  things we don’t know. Certainly, we don’t know them as children and even when we become independent, adult women, it is very baffling to many, if not most, of us. We are prey. We are groomed to be such. They know it and any insistence that we are human beings or that we don’t want to be fucked by men on our part is disregarded because they know that this is our place in the order of men’s world. It is our place to be dressed up, made-up, dancing whores. Everything we are is shaped and forced into conformity to this end and it isn’t just fathers who do it, but every man we encounter, every male teacher, every male employer, every male religious figure, every male is an authority on us – at least, in his own mind – he believes we are whores, our purpose is to be controlled and regulated, as such. He sees no other option because he is incapable of seeing women and girls as anything else. We exist only in relation to a man’s (or mens’) dick.

We “lose our innocence” when we see men for what they are. When we come to know the truth about men, we lose our childhoods forever.

For these reasons and for the fact that I can actually see them – literally see what they are and they are not like us, they are not human, whatever that word really means – I am convinced that they are nothing like us. That they are, in fact, some kind of parasite on us and on this planet. I don’t think they are a natural part of our world. They are certainly not a natural part of our lives. The only way can truly live is to get as far away from them as possible. It’s the only way to get a good, deep breath. It’s the only way to stop their violence against us.

When I say I see them as something far, far different from us, I literally mean I have had the experience of seeing them in a different physical form that appears demonic – just like all the depictions of demons you’ve seen in art from around the world, including in The Goetia. I started seeing this shortly after I left the Morgue (Mormon Organization) and my sense of everything I thought I knew was shattered and I had to start over with my perceptions of truth. At that point, I began to see men (all men, no women) walking around who are actually demons.

Carefully, I started to talk to people about this and I found out that it was a very common experience, especially among the dancers. I’ve seen entire audiences that look like they’ve been taken over by demons and I’ve seen full-blown, physical demons – as physical as any human in the flesh. They are horrifying and they have often display big, sharp teeth.

I used to go into Yahoogroups years ago, when that was a thing, and I’d find people talking about this. There is a whole discussion about “reptilians,” which has been started by David Icke and which I believe is a cover for the truth, which is that this is what men are. Lots of men talk about this subject in MUFON and conspiracy circles because they are trying to control the conversation. They try to say it’s the Illuminatti or it’s related to underground military bases, but I think this is a cover story.

Demons are not something to do with religion. A lot of Westerners automatically think of Christianity when they hear the term, but these things are very old and are found in the most ancient records and monuments going back for millennia. The depictions are all very similar.

If we just look at one famous Western text, The Goetia, which is a catalog of demons, we se that most have what we recognize as male physical characteristics. There is one or maybe two that likes to appear in a feminine form, but this is not his real form. We, also, commonly refer to the demons as “he” and “him.”

The behavior of the demons, according to grimoires, such as this one and others by Western occultists, is very similar to that of ordinary human males. The demons will try to play on human sympathy and compassion, which they see as a weakness – just as men do to women. They are very deceptive. They will try to trick the conjurer. They will try to consume the conjurer. They are strengthened by the blood and spiritual energy of women and children and by acts of sexual depravity, which cause fear in the victims. The demons feed on the energy of fear.

Men behave toward women very much like demons. The demons are seducers, who can take on a different appearance. They see humans as food, and as vessels and vehicles, just as men perceive women. We are both livestock and vessels for their demon semen.

It is well known that the demons particularly hate women. Men, also, hate us.

In every way I can think of men behave just like the demons and, of course, I have seen many of them either shape-shift into demonic form and back or I have seen the demons staring through their eyes.

If you are still reading – if I haven’t lost you – because I know how absurd this seems because it is very contradictory to how we have been told things are. It is contradictory to everything represented as a fact in media, not only now but for a very long time. But, what if what you are seeing as human men is actually just part of mind control programming? What if it isn’t the truth? What if there are some facts that, although very contradictory to how you’ve been led to believe the world works, explains it all? It explains every horrifying experience you’ve ever had with a male.

Here is an example from the Dr. Phil Show, May 17, 2016:

There are actually two episodes around this date involving the woman above and her abusive boyfriend/husband. She says something similar more than once over the course of the two episodes, you will hear it once at 4:00 (4 minutes) into the above video. She says, “I can see it.” And Dr. Phil (a psycopath in his own right) asks, “What do you see?” The woman replies, “A demon.” This is not a metaphor. She means, literally, she sees that he is a demon in the flesh.

I’ve almost gotten used to hearing these stories because I have now heard them so often always from women and the demons they see are either in the eyes of the men, in the face of the men, or more rarely, you’ll see the full, nasty, malformed body of the demon. It is always a man – always! The only time this differs is when males who are supposed authorities on demonoolgy, Ufology, the occult, or the Illuminatti conspiracy are telling the story. When I talk to individuals, it’s always the same. It is men who take on this appearance. Most of the time it is women who see it. Only one instance do I have of a male telling me this story and he was under the influence of some illicit drug at the time he saw it.

We had this discussion at my old private blog not long ago and there was a mixed response. There are lots of women who never see this. Then, there IS a whole bunch who do see it. In one case, a woman’s friend was married to one of these things. She pointed it out to her friend who said that she was aware that he was an apparent demon, but she thought he could overcome it. That woman was eventually murdered by her husband in an obviously staged “accident, which last I read (and I did follow up on the information provided), he got away with.

With the dancers, it is very common to see because the men cannot control their demonic nature, apparently, when they are sexually aroused (which seems to be anytime they are in the presence of a female human with abundant life force energy) or when they become angry. This is when the demon comes through and you see it in their faces – the face will shift – or just the eyes – and sometimes you will see the whole form shift and then shift back once they regain control.

To these men, we are like dancing sides of beef! It’s like in the Looney Toons cartoons where the coyote sees the roadrunner as a big juicy pork chop. This is how they see women and girls, in general, and this is why they are doing these things to us – to keep the food supply and the vessels close to them, under their complete domination. Men’s life force is very weak (this is known to people who study Qi Gong, but it is obvious if you work with this energy and can see it). They are often drawing energy out of the room (I see this, too) and people who have weak forces always draw off people with larger supplies of this energy who are in close proximity to them – which means women and children. Men are energy vampires – even when they are not biting us and drinking our blood or sticking their dicks in us. Even being near them is very energetically draining to us – not to mention nerve-wracking and anxiety-inducing.

It is very common in cases of so-called domestic violence for the woman to see the man appearing as a demon. Certainly, it is common to see him acting like one, even when he is free of the influence of alcohol or drugs.

When men do horrible, vicious things, they like to say that someone else made them do it. They used to say, “The Devil made me do it.”  Maybe this isn’t far from the truth – except, they are the devils. They are the demons. They act the way they do because they are these things in physical form and they are using women to obtain these forms. They have tweaked our DNA just enough to make it possible for them to infiltrate us and pretend to be what we are – this seems to be a common M.O. with men.

The shapeshifting phenomenon is, also, not unusual around the world. It is not accepted in Western culture or if it is acknowledged it is seen as the work of the devil by the religious people. More often than not is dismissed. Yet, you will find it all throughout the North American continent among the indigenous people, you’ll find it in W. European witchcraft, in African spirituality, and today – right now – if you want to learn about this, look down on our southern border or in Mexico. You’ll, also, find many people having experiences with all kinds of shapeshifters in the Phillipines and probably in every other place, if you can get people to talk to you about it.

This is not a strange thing to people who are not so grounded in Western culture. For me, it’s something I have learned to accept and I, also, think that there is much more to be learned about it. From an occult science perspective, there is a fairly reasonable explanation for how this is possible and it comes back down to what we are on the sub-physical level. On that level, it is clear, that men and women are very different and this is why our physical bodies are different, even when their bodies look like ours, they are still different. They are hairy and smelly with knobby knees – just like a lot of demons! There are many different types and appearances of demons – they don’t all look exactly alike.

There are, also, hierarchies in demonology. Some people say that is from the demons that what we call “civilization” is derived. This doesn’t sound at all incredible to me!

This is why I say the only way to stop every terrible thing that is happening in the micro and in the macro is to, at least, limit the number of these things that are entering the physical plane. It is my sense that the last thing they want is for more of us to be able to see them for what they really are. Lots of us do see it, but just haven’t come to terms with it; we are not trusting our own perceptions. A lot of women are like the woman in the Dr. Phil video – they just expect these demons to act with some respect and humanity toward them. But, this is impossible for them, just as it is impossible for men, in general, to be anything other than what they are or to see us anything other than livestock and vessels for their own purposes.

Commentary on TrustYourPerceptions’ Latest Series of Blogposts

TrustYourPerceptions is a blog written a radical feminist with a background in biology, in particular, the study of genetics. This blog doesn’t publish often, but when it does, it’s a doozy. The latest post is, “Semen: Men’s Chemical War Against Women.” It is linked below along with two previous postings.

Semen Men’s Chemical War Against Women: https://trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com/2016/05/07/semen-mens-chemical-war-against-women-no-skip-intro/

Dudes are Doomed: https://trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/dudesaredoomed1/

Forgiveness + Positive Thinking = Eating Shit: https://trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com/2012/11/04/forgiveness-positive-thinking-eating-shit/

TrustYourPerceptions is a very good name for a radical feminist blog because what we are all dealing with is a great lot of mind control programming, which begins in infancy when we are born to mind controlled mothers, many of whom have already been sexually abused and raped since the time of their own infancy. We are repeatedly told that our own perceptions of ourselves, of males, and of our surroundings are wrong. The gaslighting starts early and persists.

When I think back at the various topics I’ve discussed at this blog, most have to deal with some sort of programming or attempted programming. I’m sure that when people stumble upon some of these articles I’ve written, they are immediately turned off because often what I have to say is at odds with the status quo – or what we are told that is.

It’s normal to be put off when you first run across a really revolutionary idea. It can be upsetting. If you’re not ready to hear what is said, you might resist, be immediately turned off. You might even feel some sort of fear, anger, or other strong emotion, however, it is something to read, to consider – even if you reject it at first – then ruminate on it and see if there is something about it that rings true. That is how deprogramming works – at first we may reject an idea, especially when it is unpleasant, but once we have the chance to think about it, to let it soak into our subconscious, it can go to work breaking down old, erroneous ideas.

There is always an ongoing discussion about what radical feminism is. For instance, I recently saw a list being passed around from a left-leaning feminist blog that was titled “Radical Feminism” and purported to explain what it is in comparison to conservativism. It was a good list except that a few of the items on it were not radical feminist, but Marxist feminist. It is generally considered that there are three types of feminism: Radical, liberal, and Marxist. They are not difficult to tell apart for me since I fall pretty firmly in the “radical” category.

When I see people extolling the virtues of choice, “sex worker’s rights,” the joys of porn, and equality with men, I know I’m looking at liberal feminism.

When I see women who want to take money out of my pocket and give it to a bunch of guys to lay around, look at porn, and impregnate whatever woman is handy, then I’m looking at a Marxist feminist. Marxist feminism uses the work of a Jewish male to analyze feminism and Marxist feminists like to talk about “wealth redistribution” and the legal right of same sex marriage (working with and for the benefit of gay men to reinforce gender and the slave institution of marriage).

Neither of the above are radical feminism. Radical feminism is, as I said in a previous post here somewhere, not so much an ideology or a political position as it is simply a state of being. It’s where you find yourself when you are finally able to get away from men and are able to sort out what has happened to you. A lot of us are older. Many of us have been prostituted, subjected to pornographers, repeatedly raped, etc. A lot among us are smart young women who, taking full advantage of the information age, have access to feminist books and articles (and, also, see first hand how men operate together to abuse, subjugate, and terrorize women since this is primarily what goes on on the internet) and choose to live their lives without men, avoiding men, as much as possible. Among us are quite a few lesbians and probably quite a few women who regard ourselves as asexual – not having any sexual orientation, at all.

We call this “radical” feminism for a couple of reasons. All true feminism is radical in nature. But, since there are these derivative forms, described above, we use the term “radical” to distinguish ourselves from them. We, also, use this term, “radical,” because it describes the aim of feminism, which is to eRADicate the problem of male domination by pulling it up by its roots, casting it aside and destroying it forever, so it can never, again, grow. The term, “radical,” is derived from the Latin word, radix, which means “root.”

Furthermore, in my own radical feminism, I do not believe it is necessary for women to wait for the permission or approval of men to do certain things which are our natural rights. For instance, we don’t need anyone’s permission to menstruate, which is my way of saying that abortion/miscarriage is a natural, innate aspect of our beings and should not  – and really cannot – be subject to legal regulation by males. We do not need the permission or approval of males to do anything else with our uteri, to defend ourselves against them with lethal force, or to, in any other way, act in accordance with our own self-preservation.

We come to radical feminism when we realize that male domination is the underlying cause of every problem we face on this planet, and as individual female humans. We arrive at this place, very often, when there is simply no other place to go – we have no other option.  Males, because of their behavior and, in fact, their very nature, have left us with no other option, no other recourse. We simply want to live, to go on living and to do so without threats, terror, and life-threatening violence.

A common argument we hear – as if it were even possible to argue with people who have no other options – is that it’s “not all men,” (NAMALT: Not all men are like that!) and I admit that this is a theory I once held. I think many of us once held this idea. We hoped, at least, that there was one man who was not a demon in the flesh. We thought there was something wrong with us because we could not locate such a man. But, we have discovered the terrible truth, each of us, in our own way – often in very similar ways, though. I would like to warn any woman who wishes to learn for herself whether or not there is a single man on this planet who is not a rapist, sodomizer, or user and abuser of women, that she undertakes that mission of discovery at the risk of her life and, at the very least, her physical, mental, and emotional health.

In TrustYourPerception’s latest post, she discusses the biological danger that males pose to females, which goes far beyond something they might, theoretically (highly theoretically!) be socialized out of. In fact, this is one of the strongest cases I’ve ever seen for what I already know – males cannot be socialized or retrained to not be a harm, a parasite, and a constant danger to women. She uses biology and genetics to make this case.

If you’ve read my other posts, then you know I’m not a fan of patriarchal science (sometimes called orthodox science) and its offshoot studies, such as allopathic (orthodox) medicine or psychology, both of which are very patriarchal and founded on the abuse of women by perverted men. I have a different, yet rational, perspective, which is grounded in esoteric science.

As I was reading TYP’s latest post, I was struck by how many of her points correspond with my esoteric view of things. The overall theme of this series of posts is that men’s semen contains a chemical cocktail that is damaging and dangerous to women and girls, not just because of the obvious possibilities of causing pregnancy or infectious disease, but because it contains constituents that alter women’s minds, emotions, and physical ability to fight off males.

I don’t think this was mentioned, but I would not be surprised if there are not parasites involved in this insidious male biological warfare agent.

At any rate, this chemical cocktail creates alterations in women’s biological chemistry, which causes us to doubt our own perceptions. It causes us to doubt our own judgement. It, also, bonds females to males, while males continue to remain as machines (borrowing an apt description from Valerie Solanas), who do not experience the same bond with the female.

This explains, too, why women betray our very selves, in relation to men, and why we betray other women. It goes a long way to explain women in relationships with abusers. It, also, explains my own experience with males with whom I had sexual relations – men remain indifferent and the only sign of anything other than that is when they turn overtly abusive and violent. This is a very common female experience, for which other women like to remind us that there are good men out there and we have to have more self-respect, not let men treat us like that, look for a checklist of qualities – all of which is a set up for more abuse, of course – and maybe the next one will kill us.

This betrayal occurs because of the chemical cocktail in the men’s sperm.  Biologically, men are a disease to us. The act of impregnation, itself, is an infection. Pregnancy cannot occur in a body that is 100% healthy, so the male has to break down our health in order to impregnate us. Now, let me tell you how I know that pregnancy is an infection. I didn’t learn it through orthodox science. I learned it by studying alternative medicine. There is an herb that is a natural pesticide that can kill sperm (that is kill the flagellating things in the nasty liquid men emit) and they kill it like it’s a pest, like it’s a bug, like it’s bacteria – because that’s what it is. As it turns out, boys really do have cooties! Men really are a walking disease. This cold pressed oil from the seed of this tree can increase a woman’s immunity if it is taken properly (have to take it for, at least, 30 days) and render her impervious to the male filth. You can do your own research on the subject. The herb is called neem. It will kill the pests in your garden, too, without harming the plants.

When women must be around males, which is an unnatural situation (but, we haven’t gotten that far, yet) we lose the ability to exercise free will. We are, also, unable to be particularly relaxed or calm around males because of the constant threat of violence, which many of us have learned at an early age.  Even now, I find this is true for myself, which is why I cannot be around men, at all. Since I am not around them except rarely, I see how my health and my psychological well-being suffers when I’m in a situation where I have to deal with them. When we are around men, we are unable to be our natural selves, to behave as we normally would.

Now, if you live your entire life in proximity with males, or must deal with males frequently, this is more difficult to notice. In order to really see the difference in your behavior and your overall health when you are away from men, you have to get yourself away from them for a long period of time. This is why a lot of women don’t fully realize how anxiety-inducing the presence of males is to them. Most of us don’t have the luxury of living away from males for an extended period of time.

The cocktail that causes the bonding, the circumstances that cause the fear, and the chemistry behind the male breakdown of female immunity and health is discussed in Part 1: https://trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/semen-mens-chemical-war-against-women-part-i-male-chemical-munitions-what-semen-does-to-females/ This particular post in the series, also, discusses the doping, the dopamine, that is in the cocktail, which causes women to become “addicted to love.” Males who put their dicks in women or even put their semen on our skin, are killing us softly; they are using their “sub-lethal” weapons against women. Sexual relations with men, even when it is consenting (which is, as is clear from this biological discussion, impossible) is death to us. Furthermore, this biological war – this invisible war – is the foundation for every other wicked thing males to do females – everything from paying us slave wages (when they pay us, at all) to raping baby girls.

In Part 2, she talks about females have evolved in response to the male disease. In Part 3, she goes into various evolutionary theories, some silly, some sort of reasonable, all centering around early females trying to cope with male aggression.

In Part 4, she discusses concealed estrus as a possible cause for male enslavement of women. The overall point of this and the previous series of TYP’s posts is that males are trying to maintain control over the human genome. The conclusion- and this is my conclusion, too, coming from an occult perspective – is that earth women have been essentially hi-jacked. I differ from TYP in that I do not believe that women are fundamentally animals. I do believe that men are something more animal-like and somewhere along the line our DNA was fiddled with. I, also, think it can be un-fiddled. In fact, I’m quite sure it can be altered using electro-magnetic kind of frequencies. (This is another one of those things that when I first ran up on this idea many years ago, I dismissed it out of hand. Circumstances led to me being forced to look at it (circumstances of my own ill-health, at one point) and this (radionics) is a real thing, although it is dismissed by the allopaths, and last time I heard, by the patriarchal, orthodox scientific community.)

Here I’m going to wax metaphysical for a little bit:

Everything in the physical world has a connection to the metaphysical (in fact, is a result of it) and there are different levels. By altering what we call the etheric field, it is possible to effect changes in the physical. It is very easy to affect very small things – a small thing, like a virus is very easily dealt with by focusing the right out-of-phase wave harmonic at it. (This is not any kind of theory, by the way – this is my life! I have never suffered, cold, flu, or any type of infection since I learned about it nearly 20 years ago.) The same can be accomplished with the DNA. It can be altered by wave harmonics.

demheadI’m going to go out further on a limb (think Shirley McClain) and say that something tampered with our DNA to create a physical form that it could inhabit.(This is in all kinds of esoteric and historical records going back 5,000 years to Sumer.) This something is very hostile to us women. If you have done any research, at all, in the field of demonology, you know right where I’m going. Those things are real. They are walking around with us, often looking like human males. I know because I’ve seen them many times and many other women see them, too. They are not human on the energetic level – or if they are then we are not human. I don’t know what “human” really means. But, whatever we are giving birth to, about half of them, are neither physically nor metaphysically like us. The male is truly something other. He is alien to us. (Maybe you remember that old ABC television series, “V,” (1983) if not, you might want to take a look.)

When I said that all things have a counterpart in the metaphysical, this means that the male sperm does, too. Also, if there are parasites, these, too, have a metaphysical aspect. These things act on us from outside the normally visible realm. The behavior of the sperm, the drugging effects, the mind altering effects, the biologically altering effects on women, all have a counterpart in the metaphysical. They are truly an influence on women that is of a demonic nature. It is not wrong at all to call this black magic. It’s exactly what it is. The good news is that once this is recognized, they can be acted upon on this same level (by means of radionics, for example, which is a kind of machine) or by the directed will. (“Will” is a term that my sister occultists will recognize as the focus of the mental body on an aspect of the metaphysical to cause a desired outcome on the physical level.)

This leads me to what I have said before in previous posts: There is no way to stop the raping (including the sex trafficking, the prostitution of women and girls, the porn, the enslavement in other ways) and other abuses of women and girls except to stop bringing these poisonous things onto the physical plane with us. The only way to stop this train wreck is with our noggins. We have to change the way we think and how we focus our minds and our energy. We must stop complying. We must stop cooperating with our enemy. We must, above all, stop reproducing – especially males.

We have had some success. If you want to experience joy, find a white supremacist discussion online and look at the males freaking out because they cannot find a white woman to put the slow kill on. They are livid. They are afraid. They are going crazy because they are seeing themselves dying out – and it’s happening fast. Since the 1970s or so women in Western nations and especially white women have withdrawn from males. Every opportunity women get, we escape males – more and more. These men and their own perversion (increasingly more sick and depraved in their behavior toward us – and nobody hates white women more than white men do) and their never-ending violence against us is the cause of their own demise  They are going out like the Wicked Witch of the West when Dorothy splashed water on her!

This is what needs to happen the world over and it can, at least, to a large extent, if women re-focus our minds and our energy.

Also, in Part IV, she discusses the disabling effects of the chemical cocktail that men inject into and sometimes onto women. I have touched on the metaphysical aspect of this in a previous post, particularly in relation to rape, but it applies to any sexual relations with men, regardless of the degree of violence involved. The act of copulation is death to women on the metaphysical level. It weakens the lower will, that part of the body associated with the legs and the lower spine. This is why after rape or “consensual” sexual abuse, women cannot walk sometimes. The energy in the woman’s body is depleted – stolen – by the male. The male truly is a vampire who wants more than just your blood. He wants your essence – your life.

Men engage in sexual activity frequently with females in order to boost the bonding chemicals. This is physically and psychologically disabling. If they manage to impregnate the woman, of course, they have a whole other hold over her – especially legally.

In Part 5, she talks about how, across species, females avoid males in order to avoid rape. In fact, it’s the only way I know of to avoid it. Males rape. As far as I know, they all rape and there is no way to prove that they don’t. Therefore, it is only safe – if you value your life, your health, and your sanity – to assume that it is all.

Near the bottom of the left-hand column of this same page, she mentions that males have lost control of the genome in the past. She says it appears to have happened a few times, usually as the result of some catastrophic event. I hope she writes more on this soon.

She notes somewhere on this page that women who give birth to males are making war on other women. This is an idea, which I realize doesn’t sound very nice or very kind on the surface, where other women are concerned – nonetheless, it is an idea that I think we should nurture and grow. We should push it and there should be shame associated with a woman giving birth to a male. Right now, women are shamed in various ways when they have daughters. (In some places, it is not permitted to give birth daughters and they are forcibly aborted or exposed. Not long ago, Hitler gave medals only to women who gave birth to males.) I’ve seen discussions among childed women who say they are treated as lesser-than because they have daughters rather than sons. This has to change and the only way to change it in our favor is to reverse it, even though it seems unkind.

The last thing she urges in this entire series is for more women to become involved in this study.

This, again, is where those who have writing talent can exert some influence. Very often it is through the imagination of writers, usually writers of science fiction, that scientific breakthroughs are first manifest simply as ideas. Everything begins in the mind. It’s here we must make the first changes if we are to change anything, at all.