Why So Many Women Dislike Radical Feminism – Or Think They Do, Anyway

Radical feminism is as almost as far underground as any serious occult movement. Even some Satanists have physical headquarters and membership rolls! But, radical feminism is despised and not just by men, but  by many women. Some of the reasons for this have been discussed by famous feminists like Andrea Dworkin in her ‘Right-wing Women,” but there are other reasons, which are very obvious, but which most of us don’t dare discuss. I’ve never discussed it before, but I’m going to now. I don’t expect it will change the women who are savaging radical feminism to make a few donation dollars or promoting some other selfish agenda at the expense of victims of domestic abuse, pornography, and sex trafficking, but I do hope that women will not be deterred by these clowns and will instead bother to look at the body of radical feminist literature that has been written.

I’m going to try to describe to you what feminism looks like right now to ordinary women, who are not lesbians, who do not like being sexually molested or raped either by men or women, and who do not appreciate being humiliated. These are women who look and dress like average American women and who have careers or, at least, jobs and some ambition and drive. I’m going to explain why feminism is so repulsive to them – and to me when I look at it through the lens of their perspective.

Women do not hate radical feminism because they are masochists or are born to be abused by men. Women simply hate the representations of feminism they see in the media and on the internet. This is often women’s first and only introduction to the subject of feminism. The idea of radical feminism usually escapes them, altogether.

Humiliating public displays: For instance, recently there was this appalling pink pussy cat hat-wearing Women’s March on Washington demonstration, which is an example of what most of us do not want to be or be associated with. We’ve had enough humiliation; we don’t need to parade around with representations of vaginas on our heads and be preached to by the likes of Madonna. Madonna is about the furthest representation of an actual feminist I can imagine, but we saw her held up as an example of feminism at this rally and it is disgusting to many women, not just radical feminist women. Seeing this kind of display turns women against actual radical feminism, against the body of literature that most of them do not even know exists – a body of literature, which can free their minds and their bodies, in that order.

Poor appearance: The physical appearance of most women we see representing feminism is off-putting. Most women cannot relate to a bunch of other women who look like extras from the Rocky Horror Picture Show. Or, they look like they just rolled out of bed and didn’t bother to comb their hair or wash their faces. Women who are not lazy slobs, who put some effort into looking clean and respectable, do not want to be associated with such women – and this is the face of modern feminism.

Lesbianism: Furthermore, many women have difficulty dealing with the fact that lesbians have taken almost complete control of feminism. These are not women who just love and support other women as sisters. No. These are women who want to fuck other women. Many of us, myself included, have had the unfortunate experience of being sexually assaulted by women – more than once! I don’t appreciate being looked up and down by a woman, being sexually groped by a woman, or having a woman coming onto me in a restroom or any other location anymore than I appreciate it when men do it. So, many normal women see feminism as a threat because we see sexual predators of any sex or shade of color as a threat.

Liberalism: It is not possible to be both a feminist and a liberal anymore than it is possible to be both a feminist and a Christian conservative. The liberals want to enslave women just as much as the conservatives do, just in different ways. If you are a woman, you pretty much have to pick your poison. But, the liberals are by far the most relentlessly hateful toward women, especially white women, who are not in lock-step with them. The most recent examples of this being their disgusting attacks on Melania Trump. We are all watching the liberals lose their minds since their party lost the election and part of this has included calling this woman all kinds of names and refusing to acknowledge the real meaning behind some of the disturbing images we have seen. These people are no friends of women who have been sexually exploited. By contrast, the Christian conservatives almost look appealing – and this is largely what drives many right-wing women. Many women who are right-wing or lean that direction are appalled by the behavior of the left because of their blatant sexual abuse and promotion of the sexual abuse and exploitation of women – then making fun of those women and saying they do not deserve anyone’s sympathy or compassion.

As I said, I don’t expect these hateful, ignorant women claiming to be feminists or the liberals who claim to be our allies to change anything about themselves. But, I do hope that women who need help can look past them and, above all, read! Learn what feminism is really about – all real feminism is radical feminism, everything else is a cheap imitation designed to serve some individual  (a woman claiming to help other women while collecting donations for herself) or a group’s (lesbians looking for more victims*) selfish ends.

Free your mind and free yourself. You’re the only one who can do it. There is once-suppressed literature that is now available to you. You can read a lot of it absolutely free in the Radical Feminist Resources section tab on this page, above. Read it and meditate on what you read. It’s not as exciting as going to a rally, but it is what will lead you to the truth about radical feminism.

*Additional note: I want to say something else about this because I know this statement is likely to be controversial, but let me tell you how I arrived at this conclusion. The first time this occurred to me was back in the 1980s when I ordered some materials from the NOW. I was having a lot of problems, very bad harassment problems at work and I wanted to know more about this big-time feminist organization. I got a little packet from them in the mail and read it and discovered that there was nothing there that would help women like me; it was all about promoting lesbianism. I wasn’t into fucking or being fucked then and I’m not into it now – again, it doesn’t matter if it’s men or women! So, I concluded that feminism was really about women fucking other women. I cast that aside or have, at least, put it toward the back of my mind since so many women – seemingly nice, intelligent women –  I’ve discussed feminism with online are lesbians. But, after browsing  the growing comment section over at Terri Strange’s horrifying “Melania Trump is Not a Victim” YT video, I have concluded that for many alleged feminists and “radfems,” feminism is either a misguided business venture or a method of procuring more prospective women partners for lesbians. These women clearly have an ax to grind with women who don’t want to spread their legs for them and there’s lots of talk about “heterosexual privilege” of women – it’s absolutely nauseating, so be warned! These women, also, think we – at least, certain ones of us, deserve to be abused. I cannot come to any other conclusion and I’m sure that other women who are not at all familiar with feminism see it, too. The last thing women who’ve been subjected to sexual abuse and sexual exploitation need is more abuse – from women. These women are doing other women – the women who most need radical feminism – a terrible, terrible disservice and their victim-blaming of sexually exploited women is very appalling. This is why there are so many women who claim to hate feminism – what they really hate is that right there!

One more editorial note: Because of liberal feminism and the misrepresentation of women like Madonna or Beyonce as feminists, there are many women who believe that feminists are “whores” and “sluts.” Now, this is very odd. But, it seems to be coming from some pop cultural source that I am not in touch with,  probably television or music or both. I don’t know what to do about that idea because it is just so far afield from reality  I’m sure it is no accident that we are being represented this way. There is a woman talking about the Women’s March, Madonna, and her impressions of what feminism is in this in the video linked to below. She uses some foul and offensive language, but it does give what appears to be a right-wing woman’s impression of feminism. (In fact, she reminds me of the Kerry Heffernan character from King of Queens! I got a kick out of that because I really like Leah Remini.) So, if you want an idea of the perspective of women whose only contact with feminism is from television or liberal feminist frauds on the internet, this video may give you some insights: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6ofAFLS-N8  I have no idea how to fix this false impression. Music and television are both very powerful media. The alternative we are hit with when we deny being sluts and whores is that we hate men – which some of us do and, of course, with good reason. So, we can’t seem to win the argument on this one, no matter what we say or do.

Here’s another video from the same woman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7NW3LxWQy4 (Warning: Neither of these videos, this one or the previous, are work safe!) This is why more women aren’t banging down our proverbial door to become feminists. The woman in this video asks the question: Why are there so many men involved in the women’s movement? Now, there’s a good question. The answer is that it’s because this is not really a women’s movement, at all. These people are frauds. I cannot even imagine being out of the closet as a radical feminist, myself – and this is why almost no one who really is a feminist is, especially here in the U.S. It’s not safe. It’s extremely underground, at this time. Let me tell you how bad it is for that word “feminism” where I live: I would no sooner admit to anyone I know, outside of immediate family, to being a feminist than I would a witch or a Satanist! One of these things is about as popular as the other. (There are parallels between feminism and witchcraft in that usually no one who is really a witch and practitioner of the Dark Arts is “out” talking freely about it. Even the healing community is extremely underground and the people involved – mostly women – are all scared. It’s the nature of these things. Anyone who is “out” with a public face and is not anonymous/pseudononymous and is talking about it is likely a fraud and a charlatan.) I once used the word, “feminism,” to a local woman who runs a shelter for women who are trying to escape men who want to kill them and their children. They have to have armed security 24-hours a day at this place and when I said “feminism” to her, I might as well have sprouted devil-horns for the look she had on her face. Clearly, there are some erroneous ideas about feminism about, but when you have to re-educate someone on a subject, you are at a serious disadvantage in an argument. Usually, you cannot re-educate people once they’ve been “educated” by liberal media.

It Must Be Hell to Be Melania Trump!

There is a little video clip of the inauguration that just came up on my radar today, which shows Melania standing behind Donald, smiling and nodding encouragingly as the preacher talks about the “blessings of rain” in the Bible (I thought that was rainbows!  But, oh, well!). He says something to her, which cannot be made out by a lip reader because he is mostly turned away from the camera. She continues smiling until he turns around and then she has this horrifyingly fearful expression. She almost looks like she’s about to cry for a split second. It is just about one of the saddest damn things I’ve ever seen next to things like videos of little animals being brutally killed. Anyone who has ever been held captive by a male abuser may recognize the emotions behind the series of expressions.

I might think he said that someone just died, based on just the look on her face, except that everyone behind her continues to smile. Here’s the clip:

There has been a lot of discussion about this clip online since, at least, yesterday. It looks to me like Donald is actually speaking to his favorite daughter, Ivanka, and then says something viperous to Melania, which – being the actresses we white women (or, at least, relatively white) learn  at a very young age to be at the hands of the violent white male – she continues to smile until he turns back around. Notice, also, his smug expression once he turns back to the camera. It looks like he has said something to her in such a way that if anyone around them heard it, at all, they would not know the meaning of it – but she knows! That’s how abusers operate.

Lest I be accused of being political in my criticism, let me say that I’m not any too fond of Donald, although I’m not entirely displeased with his initial actions since he has taken office. I do think it is unfortunate for all of us that he hates women and white women, in particular, so much, which is evident in his relatively few female appointees, only one of whom, Kellyanne Conway, is white that I’m aware of.

I can only imagine what kind of Hell it must be to be married to the Pussy-Grabber-in-Chief, President Rape II, the man who has been accused of rape by his first wife, accused of raping children (lawsuit dropped due to the alleged victim being in abject terror), and has a whole bunch of highly credible women accusing him of sexually assaulting them.

This woman has been accused of marrying Donald for his money, but I think it’s a far worse situation than that. I’m certain she must have been looking for a way to stay in this country, to escape the nightmare of the former eastern block country she and her Communist parents came from. This is a woman whose desperation far exceeds the average. Such a woman would not marry out of greed, but a basic, primal drive to survive.

The clothes are beautiful, her smile is beautiful, she is perfectly poised, her posture could not be anymore erect, her steps could not be more deliberate and sure, and yet all I see when I look at this woman is the suffering of someone who has been chained in a dungeon. The whole family looks like one of Victor Frankenstein’s experiments gone awry to me and it’s not so much how they appear on the outside, like Vampires, like Eric who could have easily played Renfield in the original Dracula with Bela Lugosi. This is something I see when I look past even that veneer. It’s something truly alarming and creepy. They all seem like revenants from the grave, masquerading as the living, but none more than Melania Trump.

I honestly hope she is able to get a divorce and escape this real-life Gothic horror story without ending up in concrete shoes. There is no “privilege” for women. Anyone who cannot see this horror film that’s right in front of their eyes just isn’t looking closely enough.

Some additional material:

This is a blogpost from a few months ago. It discusses the subtle abuse of Melania by her husband at the roast. You will see, again, in the images posted there the long-suffering smile, which is a mask. How can I say, “This poor, poor woman!” But, that’s how I feel when I see this. All women’s suffering matters, including hers. What Has Once Been Seen Cannot Be Unseen by Alice: https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/47426976/posts/16867

Here’s a video clip from this roast where Melania is put on the spot by Donald, as discussed in the above post by Alice:

Late Show jokes about Melania Trump being held captive and not acting under her own power:

 

 

Does the Real Why Reason Unknown Men Molest Women Have Something Directly to Do with the Male Drive to Control the Human Genome?

I’ll try to keep this brief because I’ve been really busy, but this is on my mind and sometimes it helps to blog about things to get them out of my head. Several weeks ago, I attended a little party with attendees I did not know, except for the hostess, who I do not well, but whom I like. All of the attendees were women, except there was one man.

Although I am the true definition of an introvert, I mostly enjoyed the party while I was there. I haven’t been around people much, except for immediate family for a long time. I especially haven’t been around city people and almost all of the people there were from a larger city an hour or more away from here.

It is often said that there is a cultural divide in this country, but I don’t think it’s  so much a matter of black vs. white or north vs. south. Instead, it’s really a difference between city dwellers and rural dwellers. We might as well be living on two different planets!

Still, these were very nice women, the kind who work in offices and a few had worked in factories. But, at least, two of them spent a lot of the evening staring into iphones. Whenever they were not directly engaged in conversation, they were gazing into the devices and using a finger to scroll up and down. I’d heard about this being a social disease among milennials, but these were women well into their fifties! I found that very odd. What is the point of going to a social function, if you’re just going to stare into a little rectangular, plastic box?! I guess it’s a way to ignore things you don’t want to see or acknowledge. That’s how it seemed to work, anyway.

I sat down next to this friendly woman, who was lots of fun to talk to, when she wasn’t staring into the device, despite complaining she was unable to get a connection  on the thing out here in the boondocks. She had traveled quite a lot and quite recently and I genuinely enjoyed hearing about all of her experiences in a lot of different places. I genuinely liked her. But, when I wasn’t talking to her, I had the only man at the party on the other side of me and he was one of those guys who cannot have a conversation without putting his hands all over women, apparently.

He’s starting to get really personal with his conversation, too. After he critiques my appearance, he interrogates me about my religion (I don’t have one and where I do stand on the subject is something he doesn’t really want to know and I don’t want anyone to know). He’s a Christian and it’s important that the woman he’s molesting is Christian, too, apparently. Then, he asks me my age – another rude question that you’re not supposed to ask, but which I am frequently asked, nonetheless. I’m about the same age as all the other women in the room – over the hill! Once a girl is no longer a teenager and enters adulthood it is exceedingly rude to ask her age, but then apparently no other social rules apply here, either.

As the guy is questioning me and feeling me up, the nice woman is completely enthralled with her iphone. I try to get her attention, to politely turn the conversation to something that doesn’t involve my molestation by this man, who seems to be taking advantage of the fact that no one is paying attention.

Now, I’ve only been at this little gathering for a few minutes. I don’t want to offend my hostess, but I make a “humorous” cry for help a couple of times by saying loudly to the man, “Are you hitting on me?” and “I think you really are hitting one me.” No one seems to hear.

Meanwhile I’m doing this kind of slow-motion karate fight with this guy, who keeps touching me and I keep moving my arm to block him because, you see, out here in the backwoods, women pack heat. And, I’ve got a rod concealed on my person and if he keeps poking around and moves from just assaulting me to sexually assaulting me, then he’s likely going to find it. Maybe I should have let him find it, maybe then he would have backed off, but I don’t appreciate being felt up by men or anyone else, for that matter. So, I continued to block him like I had a black belt in that sort of thing, which – after years of dealing with molesters and rapists – I kind of do.

In another circumstance, I might grab this guy’s fingers and bend them backwards until he found himself on the floor. But, that kind of thing doesn’t work out well in social situations. It only works out in the dark corners of night clubs when you’ve got bouncers and body guards and a safe place to retreat to once you’ve punched or kicked the fucker in the face. This tactic wouldn’t work here. So, I made the excuse that I needed something to drink and found the hostess. At which point he got up and left, insisting on a “hug” from me before he departed. I knew this dudebro all of about 10 minutes!

This skeevy experience combined with the complete lack of any awareness on the part of any of the women around me caused me to remember many such situations I’ve been in. I’ve been followed by strange men and tried to get help from other women to no avail. It’s my fault this prospective killer is following me. I’ve been introduced to men before and said all of, “Hello, It’s nice to meet you,” only to have the dude come to my apartment to find me – and when I wasn’t there, by sheer luck, to be be raped or murdered, I was blamed – by the other women, including the one who introduced me to the criminal. I have so many of these stories, I couldn’t go into them all and I’m sure that if you’re reading this you have similar stories of your own.

The thing I’ve been wondering about for a long time now is why men cannot seem to talk to me without molesting me. This is a really gross problem, which serves to keep me from entering social situations and spending much time in public places, at all. Often the molesters are employees of a place! (Yes, it’s illegal for an employee of a company to put his hands on customers, but they do it, anyway.)  I think it’s a lot like hating dogs (and I do hate dogs) and then having dogs constantly coming up and put their noses in your crotch and lick you and other people think this is normal and just fine. No one bats an eye or looks away from her iphone for a second, even though you are clearly asking for help because it always happens in a situation where you can’t defend yourself the way you ought to be able to because public opinion is on the side of perverts and dog lovers!

Then, the possibility hit me that that all of this molestation has something to do with the subject of this outstanding article series, which was published on May 15, 2016, at https://trustyourperceptions.wordpress.com/, entitled “Semen: Men’s Chemical War Against Women. Appendix: Compounds in Human Semen Which Alter Female Psychology, Behavior, and Physiology.” The reason for the molestation, the masturbation in corners, and men’s insistence on sliming unknown women with their essence may have something to do with their attempts to alter our behavior in some way and maybe not just our behavior, but our reproductive capacity. Maybe all this molesting and sliming has something to do with keeping complete control of the genome.

This thought didn’t really hit me too hard until I saw this article: http://www.dailydisruption.com/years-alone-female-shark-reproduces/3213  It’s about a fish, one of a number species, who when the female is removed from the presence of males are able to continue their lineage by reproducing on their own, the offspring containing only the matrilineal DNA.

Could this be the real reason for all the casual molestation and assault by random men? I leave it to you to ponder as I continue to do.

 

 

Thoughts on Trump as President and What It Really Means for Women: White Women as Scapegoats

I’ve been reading other bloggers’ articles on the recent election of Trump, all of which express valid concerns about the possible outcomes of having a sex predator in the White House and why so many people voted for this pervert. I’ve, also, been watching the liberal democrat meltdown, which has been pretty ugly.

The Democrats are really nasty toward white women. I noticed them ramping it up in the past year or so. They’ve organized mobs to go after white women they’ve suspected of being racist – which is all of us, by the way, we are all racist just for existing. They have run all kinds of articles about racist white college girls giving themselves charcoal-based facials and taking a group photo. Warning: If you’re a white woman, never take a picture of yourself exfoliating! There are tons of examples of such “racists” all over the internet. They defend black men attacking white women by saying she must be racist, she probably called him “nigger,” so she deserved to be hit and possibly permanently injured or killed.

Back when Trump was still running and Michelle Fields, the former Breitbart reporter was battered by Corey Lewandowski and the gang of of assorted fruits & nuts and MRAs over at Breitbart began a smear campaign against her and forced her to resign, left wing dudebros, those marvelous “feminist allies” of ours, said she basically got what she deserved for working for the Republican-dominated blog. They said the same thing when Gretchen Carlson came out with her allegations against Roger Ailes. “What do women expect when they work for right-wing men?” Some anonymous women from CNN (a left-wing news organization) said the same thing was happening to them. Of course, it is. This behavior from men is ubiquitous. This is what men do to women in the workplace, regardless of the workplace or the political views of the men who work there. Left-wing men are just as bad as right-wing ones and, in many instances, they are worse. Like the 8-year olds they are mentally, they just point their fingers at other men and say, “Look at what he’s doing” as a childish diversion. Left-wing men, after all, are the main proponents of porn and the prostitution of women and girls. We women are not blind and deaf to this fact. Right-wing women may recognize it better than some others. They are not to blame when they try to make choices that keep themselves a little more safe when they dare to pursue a career of any kind or just try to put food on the table. Yet, here is the blame from left-wing men. “She should have known better.” “What did she expect?” “She got what she deserved!”

The left wing has not been kind to women. That was before the election. Now, after the election, they are really showing us their fangs:

From the Huffington-Post (not surprising, at all): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dear-white-women-we-messed-this-up-election-2016_us_582341c9e4b0aac62488970e This lovely piece calls  American white women racists for not wanting to be raped by hoards of Muslims like so many of our sisters in Western Europe have been.

Then there is this very unfunny, hateful, race-baiting, so-called comedian from the boring, pathetic excuse for a comedy show called The Daily Show, who blamed white American women for electing Trump. Samantha Bee is a foreigner – a Canadian, in fact, which makes this seem even more offensive from my point of view:

 

Then, there’s this gem from alleged feminist, Lena Dunham, at her blog, Lenny: http://www.lennyletter.com/politics/a608/dont-agonize-organize/: “It’s painful to know that white women, so unable to see the unity of female identity, so unable to look past their violent privilege, and so inoculated with hate for themselves, showed up to the polls for him, too.”  I don’t know what “violent privilege” means. I don’t know if she’s trying to say – like so many liberals have been saying – that white women are inherently violent oppressors of all other people. But, that’s what I think she’s saying. So, this puts us in a spot doesn’t it? – it’s hard to even defend yourself when you are already seen as a violent instigator. Never mind the hard fact that it is white women who are the primary victims of white male violence as well as violence from other men, including black men and, not uncommonly, black women.  I, also, resent her idea that white women are self-hating, that we somehow enjoy being abused or feel that we are deserving of it, that we are masochists – and that’s why white women (by the way, it was the electoral college, not white women of the general voting population who selected the president because that’s how our representative republic works! Maybe Dunham and Samantha Bee should actually read the U.S. Constitution sometime…) elected trump.  Before the election, Dunham promised she’d move to Canada if Trump got elected. I hope she does us a favor and keeps that promise, but I’m sure we won’t be rid of her anytime soon.

Here’s another one from a liberal charmer at Courier Mail, which doesn’t even to appear to be in the U.S. – It looks like Australia!:  http://www.couriermail.com.au/rendezview/whos-to-blame-for-hillary-clintons-loss-angry-white-women/news-story/e1b924cb06b1a40752c68078bf7a13e8 This is a nice way to talk to us white women from rural areas, isn’t it? Refer to my home as “the rural backwaters of America.” Yeah, I’m ignorant, barefoot, pregnant, toothless and living in a trailer park and, with all that immense power and white privilege, I am somehow responsible for the actions of men like Donald Trump! This is not the way to gain friends and wield influence among white women. This is not a way to win my vote or my sense of fellowship. But, we’re just animals to these liberals, anyway. They’ve been making their point very clearly for a while. Strangely enough, this article sees the triumph of Trump as white women voting against Clinton’s “feminism.” Gee, Clinton’s feminism… hmmm. I don’t see Hillary Clinton as a feminist. How many feminists do you know who are married to serial rapists? How many feminists have a best friend like Huma Abedin, who has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, and who is, also, married to (or maybe separated from by now) a serial pervert and child sex predator? Are we white women to blame if that makes us feel uncomfortable? Are we to blame if we recognize that being a “stand by your man” kind of woman is the opposite of being a feminist? Do they think white women are so stupid that we cannot see the hatred and hypocrisy of the left and the Democrats? There is no end to their abuses of us, as evidenced by this article and so many others.

There are more links to similar articles in No More Paper Towels’ article, “When All Else Fails, Just Blame White Women.”

Liberals and Democrats seem to have the idea that their perverts are somehow more acceptable than the conservative perverts in the Republican party. Well, perverts are perverts. Men are perverts and they are everywhere, running everything. Putting Clinton in office would not have changed that, at all, since her first appointee was going the be President Rape, Bill Clinton.

So, women voters got to choose from two groups of sick, sadistic perverts. Most people I know who didn’t want Clinton in there were worried about what another 8 years of the hell Obama has put us through would lead to. The biggest problem the Democrats have is Obamacare. Many women are entrepreneurs, many of us run our own businesses or work as independent contractors – exactly because of the Roger Ailes, Anthony Weiners, Bill Clintons and Donald Trumps of the world – and we are being hit hard by Obamacare. In a recent Chapman University Survey of what Americans fear most, official corruption (which the Clinton Family is no stranger to), identity theft, and Obamacare were among the the top fears. At least, 35% of respondents indicated they feared Obamacare. Personally, Obamacare has been giving me night sweats for years! I know I’m not alone, but if I say anything about it I am automatically a “racist!” This is why the Democrats and Clinton lost. In a nutshell, this is the reason. We were give a choice between two sets of perverts – one promising (albeit falsely, I’m sure) to repeal Obamacare and the other planning to reinforce it and perhaps move us into something far, far worse. So, many women voted for Trump, many of whom are not “ignorant,” “barefoot,””backwater-dwelling” women, but entrepreneurs and self-employed women, voted against more Obamacare because it is a policy, an illegal tax, which is hurting us very badly and in very real ways right now. 

I am one of those women the liberals hate. It wouldn’t matter who I voted for or if I voted at all. (I don’t believe in voting because I know all about the government corruption!) I am a frequently barefoot, gun-totin’, genuine hillbilly and I am and proud of it! I am representative of the kind of women liberal Democrats hate most! I am expected to ignore their hatred and support these abusers, somehow. I don’t think so! That hardly qualifies me as self-hating or a masochist, but it does make liberals and Democrats really, really bad people for the most part. They are rotten to the core and no different from the Republicans who I know hate me, too.

In the end this whole thing doesn’t mean much. I’ve been working on ways to deal, on a personal level, with the corruption, the Obamacare and the probably inevitable universal healthcare. I long ago stopped dealing with men, at least, by choice. When I do have to deal with them, I frequently have one hand on a rod and I don’t turn my back on them because I know all too well what they do when you turn your back. I see the liberals and Democrats as the greatest threat to my civil rights as a white woman. Many other women, apparently, see things the same way. The threat from the Republicans is more obvious – it’s right in your face. The Democrats are more subtle, but just as dangerous, if not more so.

Furthermore, if Clinton had gotten in, things would not have changed for women in any positive way. The hatred of women, especially white, American women, that was ginned up before the election would have only gotten worse. We are living on the edge a new Burning Times, as it is. I think we may have dodged a bullet by her loss and lived to fight another day.

We can’t fix this system that was made by men. A woman as Commander-in-Chief is still a war lord – and Clinton, was sure to lead us into more wars, as surely as any man, including Trump. A lot about her ties to ISIS and the government ties to this CIA-created faux problem came out in the Wikileaks emails. Everybody who was paying attention already knew this, but the emails provided links to specifically named donors, in particular in Saudi Arabia. You may remember that the Bush Family, also, has close ties to the Saudi leaders and that it looks like this relationship (collusion is a better word) played a role in the attack on the World Trade Center. These facts, also, put a nail in the Clinton coffin. Women don’t want war. We don’t benefit from war. Which of the two candidates has a history of not just stupid rhetoric, but conducting wars? Yes, Clinton. Trump is scary with his ignorance and his casual talk about using nukes, but it is Clinton who has the record of war-mongering. Somehow the Democrats seem to have bad collective memories about this.

White women, also, don’t want a Muslim invasion. This has nothing to do with racism and everything to do with liberty and self-preservation. Plus, out here in the “backwater,” we don’t like to waste lead! So, this is something we don’t want to see. We don’t want the violence we have seen committed primarily by Muslim men against white women to start happening here in the U.S. Although, it has been happening in some towns where there have been attacks on white women and rapes of little white girls by Muslim males. There has, also, been sex trafficking of white girls and women by Somalis, similar to such cases in the U.K. I don’t believe Trump when he says he’s going to stop a Muslim invasion, but I understand why it is comforting to white women to hear and maybe believe when, meanwhile, Clinton is saying outright that she’s going to bring more of these violent perverts in here to attack us – us! We are their primary targets. And, why wouldn’t she be fine with bring these monsters in here? She’s fine being married to a violent pervert, herself. Again, this isn’t feminism! Hillary Clinton is no kind of feminist. On that front, she’s as big of a fraud as Trump is.

I have no idea what’s going to happen with Trump in the White House. I’m concerned about the nausea and the horrific nightmares I endured the past few months just from reading the daily news online. I really cannot cope much longer with hearing about “pussy grabbing” and “Weiner-gate” and being reminded of the nightmare of the Clinton years with its talk of cigars and semen-stained, blue dresses and jokes about Slick Willie and his dick. I’ve reduced the amount of news I read. If it looks like there are going to be more of these horrible, disgusting things coming out everyday – which seems likely with Trump – I plan to stop, not just scale back, looking at news sites.

A few months ago, I wrote some posts talking about the child-rape case against Trump involving Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted child-rapist and known sex trafficker, who is good friends with the Clintons and the Trumps. That alleged victim and some others tried, again, to bring a suit in New York. Epstein’s victims are only allowed to sue civilly. That’s part of the deal that was made and he’s settled with a number of them – recently, I read 50, but it’s probably more. These appear to be some other victims. A few days before the election, Lisa Bloom (attorney and daughter of Gloria Allred), was planning on giving a press conference with that victim, who was going to come forward in public for the first time. (Other of Epstein’s victims, those still living, are in hiding. Virginia Roberts, his most famous victim, is rumored to be in hiding somewhere in Australia.) At the last minute, the press conference was cancelled, with Bloom stating that her client is “living in fear.” Here’s a video below:

 

Bloom, also, said that all of her clients related to Trump cases had been threatened and her firm’s website was hacked that day.

It is not unheard of for Trump’s team to threaten women who are trying to sue him. For instance, there is this case of one of the plaintiffs from one of the many suits against “Trump University.” She was the lead plaintiff and was terrorized into dropping out.

Furthermore, there is this disturbing video of one of Trump’s alleged sexual assault victims, who is clearly scared out of her wits since he is going to be president:

 

The sounds Ms. Zervos is making are familiar to me. This is the kind of condition I was in after I was held at gunpoint and nearly murdered a few years ago by three huge men, one of them an on-duty cop. These uncontrollable noises this woman is making while her attorney is speaking are the result of terror that is so strong that it causes your body to sort of energetically surge, it’s a strong physical pulse of energy, and you involuntarily make these sounds. This is the fear of knowing you are surrounded by inhuman monsters who want to devour your flesh and drink your blood! I don’t know if I can take 4 years of this kind of thing, but I’m afraid this is what we are in for.

My final words to you are these: Take care of yourself. It’s all you can do. Take care of yourselves first and worry about social causes some other day. We are all in deep trouble and we were before this election was decided and it would not have mattered which one of these degenerates and their party won. The same sick, patriarchal system has its boot on our necks and they’re no different now than the were in 1692. We’ve just got to find our own way out from under. We’ve got to find our own way around these obstacles. A frontal assault is clearly futile. We are completely outnumbered. We have no allies – certainly not on the left. And you already know the right sees us as nothing more than livestock. So, we’re on our own. We must think about living to fight another day.

So, take care of yourselves, all of you!

Additional reading:

This article from The Atlantic, October 2016, “Fear of a Female President” describes some of my own concerns about a female presidency being accompanied by an increase in male violence against women, especially white women. The backlash against white women in the U.S., which was strong before the election cycle began last year, grew immensely. The talk about burning witches and so on was really hair-raising and came from men on both the left (most notoriously, the Bernie Bros) and men on the right. My personal fears were that the attacks against white women would increase if Hillary Clinton had won. This article talks about just that: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/10/fear-of-a-female-president/497564/

It turns out the assertion that white women “elected” Trump comes from a CNN exit poll of run-of-the-mill voters. Here’s a link to the article at CNN: http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president I have not been able to locate any information of the actual vote, which is the electoral vote, which is the one that elected Trump. I seriously hope that the electoral college is just the “electoral college” and is not divided by skin color and the type of genitals they have. Perhaps that is the case and maybe that’s why I cannot find any such information online. As every American knows (or should know), the only vote that counts toward the election of the president of the U.S. is that of the members of the electoral college. Also, exist polls are notoriously inaccurate. So, the liberals are just making this whole thing up to smear white women. Their hatred has never been more palpable. They are classic abusers.

“Good Girls Revolt,” a New TV Series Portrays the Lawsuit Brought by Eleanor Holmes Norton

This clip below from the Stephen Colbert Show made me feel really good and I hope it does the same for you. He is bringing a little advertisement to a new TV show, “Good Girls Revolt,” which tells the story of a civil rights suit brought by Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton against Newsweek for equal employment opportunities for women.

It is rare to hear the term, “civil rights,” applied to women. I’m glad someone remembers that we are included in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A lot of people seem to forget this. Maybe this new TV series will remind us all.

Here’s the clip:

Here’s a bit about the show, its cast, and a few reviews from viewers of the pilot, from IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4687892/

This is actually an Amazon Series: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/good-girls-revolt/

The trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R0DqIcUntc

Watch Episode 1, free right now from Amazon.com: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=where%20to%20watch%20good%20girls%20revolt

Thoughts on the Alleged Rapist, Julian Assange, and Invasions of Privacy

A couple of days ago, there were rumors swirling that Assange was dead. I felt a sense of relief on behalf of his two alleged victims in Sweden. I hoped, for their sake, this was true. You can read about the accounts of the two alleged victims here: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/dec/17/julian-assange-sweden

Assange, an Australian citizen, was granted asylum at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London about 5 years ago on the grounds that his civil liberties were being violated. Little thought was given to his two alleged victims in Sweden and their right to due process (however it is described in Sweden) and their civil liberties as free women and citizens in their own home country. Assange’s civil liberties – his right to invade others’ privacy – was of foremost importance.

The two women were called a “honeypot”- a trap. I would suggest to men that if they wish to avoid the possibility of any such “traps,” they should keep their dicks and other body parts to themselves. It’s a simple matter for men to avoid accusations of rape – don’t stick your dick places it shouldn’t be, anyway. It’s very simple, unless, of course, you believe that we women exist for this purpose. That, apparently, is the position of those who defend Assange.

Rape is a violation. It is an invasion. Rape may be accurately described in many ways, including as a violation or an invasion of privacy. This is what Assange quite notoriously does and for which he is hailed as a hero by many. He invades people’s online privacy, collects, and disseminates this information.

The right to privacy is regarded as a basic human right. It is regarded as so important here in the U.S. that it was described in several Amendments in the Bill of Rights. For instance, we have the Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Assange is frequently described as a journalist, however, his status as a journalist is questionable since journalists are supposed to have ethical standards. Journalists are expected to uphold the law and honor basic human rights, including rights to privacy. They are not supposed to divulge damaging personal information that harms innocent people.

Yet,  according to this Newsweek article, Wikileaks has released personal information in the Clinton email hack about a single woman, a mother, and a staffer at the Clinton Foundation and her personal struggle with depression, which has been harmful to this innocent individual and her family.

According to this article, first posted on July 25, 2016, posted at Huffington Post, “WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger, for No Reason, they doxxed 20 million Turkish women, exposing their names, physical addresses and other personal and private information in the so-called “Erdogan Email” dump. They eventually removed this information, but the damage was done as nothing is ever really removed from the cyber world.

In this August 23, 2016 article from the Inquisitr, “WIKILEAKS POSTS RAPE VICTIMS’ MEDICAL INFO AS JILL STEIN PENS OP-ED PRAISING ‘HERO’ JULIAN ASSANGE,” it is reported that Wikileaks revealed the identities and private information of two teen-aged rape victims along with more than 100 files in a medical information dump.

This kind of careless disregard for the privacy and safety of other people – frequently women, it seems, and in the case of the Turkish violation, they were all women voters! – disqualifies Assange and Wikileaks as any kind of authentic journalistic endeavor.

Furthermore, what have we learned about corruption from Assange’s information dumps that we didn’t already know? Nothing. No one who is paying attention would be surprised in anyway by any details in the emails of the politicians who have been so gleefully “exposed.” It’s a joke and, it appears, a personal economic opportunity for Assange to push his book.

A couple of days ago, it was reported that the Ecuadorian embassy cut off Assange’s internet connection because he is using it to interfere with the election process in the U.S. It is clear that he is not a supporter of Hillary Clinton. He has made this clear by both word and deed. There are, also, accusations that he is colluding with members of Trump’s campaign, which appears to have many ties to the presumably defunct Soviets – not the least of which is his marriage into a Communist family the third time around. While I’m no supporter of either of the Clintons, having grown up in the Cold War Era, Trump’s coziness with allegedly-former Soviets makes me extremely uncomfortable.

One of the hallmarks of a Communist regime is authoritarianism, but there is, also, corruption and lawlessness, as we in the U.S. understand the meaning of the word, “law.” As Americans, we understand “law” to mean rules that limit government and uphold civil liberties and basic human rights and freedoms.

Assange’s lack of understanding about basic human rights – his willingness to violate the privacy and civil liberties of individual women he meets and of large groups of women unknown to him and his organization inform us as to where he stands. He is no champion of civil liberties – at least, not for women.

His recent lack of internet connection has led some to speculate that Assange has croaked. But, I’m sure we couldn’t be so lucky.

How the Religious Right and the Liberal Left Justify Men’s Rape and Sexual Assault of Women and Girls

slevogt_faun_and_a_girlIn this post, I propose the reason why both the religious right (Christians, Jews and Muslims) and the liberal left – two groups who appear, on the surface, to be at odds with each other – both justify and support men raping and brutalizing women and girls. This runs deep, at least, 5,000 years, and cannot be eradicated through social change. It just is and, if you are a woman or a girl living on this planet, you need to know about it so you can try to save your own life as best you can.

Men (and boys) believe they have a fundamental, natural right to harm women and girls. They believe this is part of the “natural order.” If they are religious, they believe this “natural order” comes from God, Jesus, Jehovah, or Mohammed. If they are on the left, they may believe that it is “scientific,” in which case they will cite the behavior of animals or the work of Darwin.

It is all simply a justification for men’s violence toward women and girls. There is no “natural order” that must propogate the human race or that makes rape, as the Christian leader of the Republican Party, Paul Ryan once put it, “a method of conception.”

This fundamental belief that it is normal for men to stick their dicks in women and girls and to harm us in other ways, as well, is absorbed by the victims, women and girls, in patriarchy, who are truly bound in a state of mass Stockholm Syndrome.

The right-wing women are loving males to survive. They usually have husbands and sons or they have other males in their families they feel they must defend from the “evil,” “plotting,” “feminist,” “lying” women who dare say they have been harmed by males.

They’re a lot like Melania Trump, who right now has nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. I felt her panic when I saw the two interviews she did after her husband was exposed on tape talking about sexual assault, ie. “grab ’em by the pussy,” but he’s got her all tied up the way men always tie women up before they do other things, the most brutal and horrific things – she’s controlled by economics, by a lack of money, by a fear of homelessness and probably of her parents’ homelessness (since the former Soviets now live in Trump Towers, according to reports). How terrified she must be to be married to a man accused by so many credible women of sexual assault and rape. His first wife stated under oath in an affidavit that he pulled her hair and raped her. Think how frightening it must be to be in this situation as the third wife! Outside, she is going nowhere, she’s “standing by her man,” but on the inside she’s running for her life right now!

Right-wing women and left-wing women all absorb the deeply ingrained belief that women and girls exist for men to do evil to.  Both love men to survive in one way  or another. They completely absorb the belief that they deserve it to be done to them. This is how they justify sexual assault, porn, and prostitution. Sometimes we justify it this way even when these things are happening to us, ourselves, as individuals. We hope the world is different – that there is one man who is different. But, there isn’t. No matter what they say to us, they all hold the same fundamental belief that we exist for their pleasure – to have dominion over, as the earth – to use, to destroy if they wish and we have no recourse except to take it because it is our lot in life. They believe we like it. “You like that, don’cha?” they often say while they are beating, raping and killing us. They laugh while they rape us because torturing and murdering us isn’t just a thousands-years old belief, it’s their joie de vivre and their raison d’être.

I remember being told when I was 13-years old and didn’t want to go out with a boy (I wasn’t allowed to date ’til 16, anyway) that I “deserve whatever happens to me.” That statement from a faceless boy still echoes in my mind especially because so many terrible things have happened to me and no one cared. There was not even anyone to tell. Only recently have some of these things been considered crimes, at all.

I understand and I want you, the reader, to understand that all the terrible things that males have done to you, they have done because they hold this fundamental belief that men harming women is the natural order – it is “god’s will” or it is “how the species propagates itself,” depending on the politics and religious views of the male. Women who persecute you have absorbed this belief, as well.

But, this is not why we are here. We were all born for greater things. (This is Luciferian philosophy, similar to that which you’ll find in the works of Madame Blavatsky, that we are capable of super human greatness.) We are something other than animals. We are spirits (complex energy operating simultaneously on other planes of existence) who are capable of amazing things.

I do not expect that the men and boys who do these things to us will ever be made to pay for their crimes and I do believe that the only way to eradicate the practice of males harming women and girls is to eliminate the males, entirely. This belief that we are here for them to harm is so great in them and runs so deep that it will never be eradicated from them because it is who and what they are. They are forever mortal enemies to us. They serve no purpose except to pollute and to make war and misery for women and girls. They are nothing but poisonous weeds in what could be a beautiful garden.