Dear Liberal Feminists, Don’t Tell Me How to Feel When I Recognize an Abused Woman

This is just a quick post to express my disgust at some of the liberal feminists (not all, they’re are some who are showing a lot of compassion!) and some pretend rad-fems (they know who they are, although it’s no one I’ve ever corresponded with) who are out there making videos and talking about “choice” and “consent” in relation to Melania Trump.

Of course, what has got a lot of women talking, especially those of us familiar with what it’s like to be trapped in a terrifying abuse situation, is that clip from the inauguration video (mentioned two posts back). How I felt when I saw the look on her face is exactly how a lot of other women, apparently, felt. It’s just one of the most awful things and it has led many of us to speculate about the obvious, as I did in that past post.

Still, there are some feminists, I don’t wish to be hurtful here, but frankly these women are exactly what alienates a lot of would-be feminists. It isn’t just their appearance. Clue: They don’t look anything like Melania Trump and would probably never end up in a nudie spread in a magazine. So, it seems that that kind of exploitation is beyond their grasp. Many seem to be life-long lesbians (lucky folks) who have never had the first-hand knowledge of how diabolically abusive and debilitating relationships with men are for women.

As such, these women – these so-called feminists – are just another brick in the wall of patriarchal abuse. They are representative of the women who help keep the abuse machine going. “Don’t feel sorry for her,” they say. (Yes, they’re saying this.) “She knew what she was getting into.” She deserves abuse, they say, because she said something they  didn’t like. In fact, she said what everyone with two eyes and half an ounce of computer sense can see, which is that the Obama birth certificate was a digital fraud. Oh, you noticed that? Familiar with Photoshop, are you? Do you have the “wrong” political views? Well, then, according to these women, the’re off they hook. Your suffering is all your own fault. That’s what I’m hearing from the likes of Teri Strange, of all people, in a recent video of hers in which she repeatedly talks about Melania’s “choices” and her “consent.”  (She started losing me a few weeks ago when she came out as a Marxist – nice! Yes, that’s right, nobody has the best interests of women like egomaniacal, authoritarian Jewish men. Well, it’s good to know who your enemies are, even when you find out a little bit late.) Here is the video, which is idiotic and all I can say in defense of Teri Strange is that she is not from the U.S. and seems to have not a clue how things work here. Nonetheless, it is a very victim-blaming, gas-lighting, condescending, smug (it must be wonderful to be this pure and above women who have been sexually exploited by men from the time they were little children), hypocritical, and maybe not-so-ironically dictatorial video:

Again, this is not political for me. I’m extremely pleased with Donald Trump as president. I don’t know if we’re all being set up. I suspect maybe we are. Certainly time will tell. But, there is a reason that this dude has had two out of three wives from the old Soviet Union. It was  – and, no doubt, still is – an authoritarian regime. People were not allowed to leave the country except under extraordinary circumstances. I will never forget seeing some of those people about six months after the wall came down and they were finally free. They are beautiful people, but they looked malnourished, their teeth were in need of care in many cases, they were impoverished and their lives were very sad and they didn’t know why they were so unhappy until they saw that wall come down.

Melania Trump grew up under that kind of regime. She grew up in poverty, the daughter of a card carrying Communist. The evidence in the various papers and what we’ve seen of Melania’s early life appears to have been one of exploitation from an early age. What kind of father dresses up his little daughters and prances them around in front of men?! (See the photo of the little girls in a room full of men at this link, it looks very strange to me.) What was she being groomed for?! The same thing we’ve all been groomed for. (Some of us more than others, granted, but that doesn’t mean we deserve it. Nobody asks to be born a Communist  – or to be born into a family of authoritarian and sexually warped religious nuts, such as in my own case!)  When a young girl is entrapped this way at a very early age, she doesn’t have the ability to exercise “consent” and “choice” because she is constantly focused on this little thing called survival!

There is a reason that men go to Eastern European countries to find women like this. It’s easy to trap someone in a foreign country where they have little mastery of the language. (And, just why is her English so bad after something like 20 years here? Is it because he has so isolated her? I wonder.) Many of them are very beautiful and they have lived under the heel of tyranny, poverty, and authoritarianism. I understand the frustration and the fear of having such a woman representing this country and representing by default the women of this country. It frightens me, too. But, to have no feelings of compassion for the plight of these women, including Melania, is monstrous.

The fact is we do not know what ability this woman has had to choose or consent to anything. After all, she did not even start out her life living in a free country. Every time I see an image of her, she looks to me like she’s scared half out of her wits. It is unlikely that she is free to speak for herself. She is not in a powerful position. On the contrary, she is in a very scary position, as was the first wife. Trump’s mob ties are not exactly undocumented. We know what has happened to women trying to bring a suit against him for any reason, at all. We, also, know what happens to women who cross Trump at the hands of his “beautiful Twitter” followers. If I were in her shoes, I ‘d be scared to death right now.

Really, I’m not going to bother trying to explain this to pseudo-feminists who only care about themselves. I doubt if they read much of anything I write, anyway. Furthermore, I know that just about anyone bothering to read this gets it already and I’d just be preachin’ to the choir. Frankly, these so-called feminists mean nothing to me. The liberals disgust me more and more every day as I’m watching them practically self-immolate. I’ve got my own thing going and I suggest if you’re reading this, you do your own thing, too. Focus on your own survival, on your own needs, and your own goals. I don’t say this because I want to tell you what to do, I just think it’s sad when women waste time on other women who clearly hate our guts! They’re not much different from the male abusers in that regard.  They are keeping this system of abuse in place as much as the men are and then when they throw in the hypocrisy of claiming to care one iota for women and the oppression of women, it reeks of betrayal. In fact, they are handmaidens most of all, with their: “Don’t feel sorry for her!” 

Additional material:

This is an article from the notoriously liberal, faux-feminist site, Jezebel, telling us all how privileged Melania is and how she deserves male abuse. If you want to keep your blood pressure down, skip the article and check out some of the comments, many very compassionate and understanding from other women who have been there. They all say the same thing I said in my previous post on this – I recognized that look in her eyes. I wish I could rescue her myself! But, we all know women have to do it themselves. Still, some compassion helps! Not turning your back on someone who is suffering, scared, and confused helps. On the other hand, this nasty rhetoric from a lot of lefty women is what is killing feminism! Here’s the article: https://theslot.jezebel.com/melania-trump-doesnt-deserve-your-sympathy-1791525306

No, Men, 12 and 13-year Old Girls Cannot Be Sluts or Tramps

girlsAccording to the online Google dictionary, “tramp” is defined as “a promiscuous woman.” A slut is defined as “a woman who has many casual sexual partners. Synonyms: promiscuous woman, prostitute, whore.” The word can, also, mean a woman with poor hygiene, but that, too, has a sexual meaning – she is dirty because many men have stuck their dicks into her.

Yesterday, I was browsing the U.K. Dail Mail online, when I ran across this very sad, but not at all uncommon story of a little 13-year old girl being “bullied” – that’s what they call things like sexual assault, psychological abuse and physical violence of all kinds these days – by classmates who cut her hair, threatened to stab her and called her a “tramp.” The article is here: Cruel bullies ‘cut terrified 13-year-old schoolgirl’s hair as she sat in her classroom and threatened to stab her’ by Rachel Burford, September 7, 2016.

I read the article with a great deal of sympathy for the little child because something very similar happened to me at age 13 at a U.S. public school (an institution which should be wiped off the face of the earth), which forced me to attend private school. Private, Catholic schools are far from perfect, a lot of the male teachers were perverts, but I was far safer there. I was pretty sure I was going to be killed at the public school. I was being sexually assaulted daily and I narrowly escaped being gang raped in an isolated hallway. I was, also, stalked, harassed, and physically attacked. Furthermore, it wasn’t just the students – it was teachers and administrators who were in on it, as well, and participated in this sexual harassment of a 13-year old girl!

I thought my name was “Slut.” That’s what I was called constantly. The very day I transferred to the new private school, two big girls saw me enter the school and I heard it, again: “She looks like a slut to me.” It’s something I cannot forget.

It bothered me a lot then, of course, but what is even more bothersome, perhaps, was the response of adults. I remember asking a couple of people about it or mentioning that I was constantly called that word. A couple of older men told me that lots of little 13-year old girls really are sluts.

I remembered that, again, when I read the article about the little girl in the U.K. because this is what the father – an adult male, an older man – said in defense of his 13-year old daughter who is being called a “tramp”:

He said: ‘It started with name-calling, Then she started getting phonecalls as well, saying she was a tramp. She was only 12 at the time and had never had a boyfriend.’

He could have stopped at “She was only 12 at the time,” and that would have been just fine, but he has to mention that a little child has not had a boyfriend. I don’t know what kind of 12-year olds have boyfriends. I don’t know of any 12-year old girls who are running around joyously fucking boys or men. So, why did he feel the need to add that last bit to the sentence? Because we have to explain – to men, mostly – that a little girl, a particular little girl, is not a tramp. Why is this explanation required? Because there are men – lots of men, normal looking men, maybe men in your family – who believe that little 12 and 13-year old girls are asking for it. They believe the little girls want it.

This is men. This is the best of men.

They cannot be re-trained. They cannot be “fixed” – unless by fixed you mean neutered, which might be a good idea. They are irredeemable. They are inhuman.

 

 

Baking with Amy, Part I: About the Cyberbullying and Deception Surrounding a Woman’s Bakery and Bistro Made Famous on the T.V. Show, “Kitchen Nightmares”

This is the first of what is to be a three-part series of posts on Amy Bouzaglo and her new cookbook, “Baking with Amy.” This first post is a discussion of how she and her bakery, which was located in Scottsdale, Arizona, came to be internationally known. The next two posts will be as follows:

Baking with Amy, Part II: Review of Amy Bouzaglo’s Cookbook, “Baking with Amy.”

Baking with Amy, Part III: My Results with a Favorite Dessert from Amy Bouzaglo’s Cookbook.

I will insert the links for the newest articles once I’ve posted them.

Amy's_Baking_Company_front_door

The front door of Amy’s Baking Company showing the restaurant’s logo Date 16 May 2013, 19:03:33 Source https://www.flickr.com/photos/planetwrite/8745834055/in/set-72157633499219381/ Author John Aho

Ordinarily, when I want to review a book, I simply write a review. But, I’ve now read several other people’s reviews of Amy’s cookbook (all positive) and every one of them is met in the comment section with criticism for not addressing the television show, “Kitchen Nightmares.” I really wanted to address that, anyway, because it pertains to some problems that women – especially beautiful, talented women – face at the hands of cyberbullies (most, but not all of whom, are males) and real-life harassers. Amy’s story, also, touches on the abuses of male chefs, which are commonly reported by women chefs. You would think for all the times that men keep telling us to get back in the kitchen, they’d be happy whenever we are there  – but, no! I, also, wanted to keep the review of the cookbook separate from this whole discussion. My review is very positive. I love the book and I’m going to tell you, in the next post, why I think it’s so good. But, what I have to say here is not so pleasant because it revolves around subjects like bullying and the deceptive fraud that is reality television.

In some of the earliest posts at this blog, I’ve discussed the hoaxes that get passed off as news. I’m sure some people find it hard to believe or just don’t want to believe it. It’s scary to think that almost everything you see on television and a lot of the trends that occur online are based on pre-planned fraud perpetrated by people who are generally trusted television personalities. (This is the nature of PsyOps as written about by the the modern father of propaganda, Lt. Col. Michael Aquino.) Anytime you see something on television or online that is being turned into a major event, you should put on your critical thinking cap.

Once you learn what to look for, it’s easy to spot fraud.

For instance, I’ve discussed previously the Roanke, Virginia shooting hoax involving a reporter and cameraman supposedly being shot on air. But, if you slow down the two videos provided, which were supposed to have been filmed at the same exact time (one by the cameraman, which supposedly was live on air and the other by the alleged shooter), you see that (1) they don’t match up and (2) no cartridges and no wad are ejected by the fake, stage prop Glock. The “news” is fake, at least, a lot of it is and the rest appears to be greatly manipulated as can be shown through endless examples that go back, at least, as far as the late 1960s, in my own investigations. They’ve been faking the news for, at least, that long in order to manipulate public opinion and to get and keep viewership.

Viewers (and now internet and social media denizens in conjunction with mainstream television viewers) are usually manipulated for, at least, one of two reasons: To sway public opinion about a matter and to make money (often by means of ratings).

Not everyone is ready to accept the truth about the news being manufactured. But, everybody knows that Reality T.V. is fake, right?!

Well, wrong – apparently. Nonetheless, it is as scripted and planned out as any fictional television programming. The people making the programs, also, use some dirty tricks to illicit the reactions they want to get from the people in the programs. They spend days filming with multiple cameras from different angles, then edit it all down into one approximately 25 minute (for a half-hour show ) or 45 minute (for an hour-long show) series of clips.

In this article from Independent.co.uk, people discuss how fake and staged so-called reality television shows are: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/reality-tv-contestants-reveal-how-real-the-shows-actually-were-a6834246.html  The article is based on this discussion from Reddit by people who have been on various reality shows: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/420tzp/serious_people_who_have_been_guests_on_reality/

This article, “I Work As a Writer For Reality Shows — Here’s the Deal
And believe me, they’re not glamorous. They’re also not ‘real.’” from XOJane, discusses the truth about the actors, writers, and tactics involved in the production of these programs. Would you be surprised to learn that the “hillbillies” of Duck Dynasty are actually, clean-cut, golf-playing yuppies in absurd costumes? They are caricatures of people who don’t really exist – all made to order for gullible television viewers.

missde

The first time you see this picture, you will see one image, but if you look again, you will see another. Once you see it, you can’t stop seeing it. It’s the same with fake television programming – once you see the fraud, you can’t stop seeing it.

Once you see how fake, how edited shows, such as the two episodes of “Kitchen Nightmares,” that featured Amy’s Baking Company are, you will never be able to stop seeing it. It’s like looking at one of those Magic Eye pictures or those pictorial illusions (see image to the right).

In two radio interviews, which are linked below in the Timeline of Events, you can hear Amy Bouzaglo discussing how Gordon Ramsay got the kind of reactions he wanted for his show out of her and her husband during the filming. She talks about how they planted actors and some members of the local community who had taken a disliking to them in the restaurant in order to create drama for their one-hour (45 minutes) program, which they filmed over the course of a week. (8/11 Correction to the previous statement: They were supposed to film for a week. The contract was cancelled after three days of filming. After he created chaos and psychologically tortured Amy for the camera – which was then heavily edited so you never hear Amy when she talks about the things he did (they cut her off and impose his voice over hers in the final edits) – Ramsay left on the second day he was there. On the show, Ramsay says he chose to walk out. In the radio interviews, Amy says they wanted to end the contract and asked him to leave.) Once you hear her talking about how it was done, those two episodes of “Kitchen Nightmares” and any other episodes of that show will never look the same to you, again.

As you’ll see from the timeline, below, Ramsay quit his show a few months after they revisited Amy’s Baking Company in an episode using mostly clips from their first visit. The second airing was not authorized by Amy and Samy, according to the interviews they have given on Totally Driven Radio (see the Timeline of Events for links). His show was exposed for the fraud it is and you will see the fakery, the editing, the actors planted as “customers” making faces at plates of food and sending it back to the kitchen, flustering the cooks, in practically every episode of his now dead show.

I am basing the information in this article on solely on what I’ve found online from articles, the television episodes themselves, and from interviews with Amy and Samy, which you can find in the links provided in the Timeline of Events, below.

Timeline of Events:

  1. Amy’s Baking Company opened its doors in 2007.
  2. February 6, 2013 (this is the post date at YouTube), Check Please, AZ, PBS, reviews Amy’s Baking Company. You’ll see a stellar review of Amy’s Baking Company starting at about 10 minutes into the video, which is from a local television program in Scottsdale, Arizona.
  3. Amy’s Baking Company, “Kitchen Nightmares” aired May 10, 2013.
  4. Amy and her husband Samy Bouzaglo appeared on the Dr. Phil Show, which aired on April 9, 2014.
  5. Return to Amy’s, “Kitchen Nightmares” aired April 11, 2014.
  6. 1st Interview on Totally Driven Radio on October 31, 2013.
  7. 2nd Interview on Totally Driven Radio on June 5, 2014.
  8. Gordon Ramsay’s reality T.V. show, “Kitchen Nightmares” last aired on September 6, 2014. Amy mentions in the 2nd radio interview, linked above, that Ramsay announced online that he was done with the show in June 2014.
  9. Baking with Amy is published on April 15, 2015.
  10. Amy’s Baking Company is reported closed on December 29, 2015 by AZCentral. According to my calculations, the restaurant was in business for 9 years, which is a pretty good run.

I’ve made no secret of the fact that I hate television and I don’t have it. I haven’t had it for years. Some people think that people like me who “brag” about not having television and say we hate it are being pretentious, but the fact is, I just can’t stand it. I know that, at least, 99% of what is broadcast is fake. Most of it is extremely misogynistic. Fewer and fewer women are watching television these days because it’s just not a pleasure for us to see women being raped and slaughtered for male entertainment purposes. I, also, find that it is difficult to talk to people who do watch a lot of television because even if they do believe on some conscious level that television is partly or all fiction, they still talk and act like they believe what they see and hear on it. It is impossible to reason with them, to present any facts, even those based on events I’ve personally experienced, when I have to compete with the lies propagated by television. It really has turned a lot of people’s brains to mush. It’s scary.

There is a huge, scary mob of people who are easily influenced by what they see on television. They are reminiscent of the peasants with pitchforks and torches from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. There are mobs of these people who are seem to be looking for someone to hate, someone to direct their hatred at, which is why they are sometimes simply called “haters.” Women online, in particular feminist writers, are well aware of such “haters,” most of whom are men and most of whom have a special kind of sexualized hatred they direct at women. Some of these are basement dwellers sponging off mom. Some are professional – dudebros like RooshV, who make a living teaching men how to hate and rape women or like Paul Elam, who collects donations and puts out bounties on the heads of women, making them fear for their lives, and there are men threatening to rape them, their daughters, even to harm their elderly parents (such as the threats reported recently by Jessica Valentia and the ongoing threats and organized professional man-hate against Anita Sarkeesian).

In a way, Gordon Ramsay is was one of these professional trolls. He had a production company that apparently cooperated with restaurant “reviewers” from the website, Yelp, to locate restaurants to feature on his show. Most of these restaurants were in trouble. He’d go in and try to capitalize on any existing drama, invent some of his own with the help of actors and by means of his own apparent knack for being an abusive bully and upsetting people. He’s notorious for his disgusting foul mouth, which apparently is all part of his charm to people in the British Isles. The British have been exporting some very unpleasant men to this country  in recent years (e.g. Piers Morgan and Simon Cowell) and this is a trend I’d like to see come to an end. We don’t need it. I understand it is being done because they work cheaply and, of course, they are cheap in other ways. Cheapness is, also, the reason why there is a proliferation of these horrible so-called reality shows. Compared to the kind of television programming that used to be done (remember the ABC Movie of the Week?) these show are very inexpensive to produce.

Amy and Samy were never paid for the two episodes. They didn’t get their permission to do the second episode, which included some clips of an interview by someone from “Kitchen Nightmares” named Garcia. Ramsay didn’t have the decency to even present himself for the “Return to Amy’s” episode. You will see and hear him narrating and you’ll see a lot of clips and phony interviews with people who know the Bouzaglos or who claimed to have a bad experience at the restaurant (like 2 people who were reporters, but never identified as such for the episode, who appear to have planted three fruitflies in a drink in order to make a news clip out of it for a local news show), but Ramsay was never actually there.

Furthermore, the “submission video” shown in Return to Amy’s was fictional. Amy says they did not submit a video. Rather, they were approached by a production company, Amy discusses this at about 8 minutes into the 2nd interview on Totally Driven Radio.

Amy and Samy had drawn the wrath of some of the locals in Scottsdale, according to Amy, because they were a very high-end, yet small operation, and sometimes they had to turn away patrons because they did not have the capacity and staff to serve them on some occasions. So, there got to be a kind of local lynch mob, which aired its malice on Yelp.

When they were contacted by “Kitchen Nightmares,” Amy was under the impression that they were going to get some national attention for their restaurant and Ramsay would help spread the world about the excellent food their restaurant offered. At that time, the restaurant was not troubled. The only problem they had was cyberbullies on Yelp and on their Facebook page.

Amy made one very bad mistake: She fed the trolls! 

Never feed the trolls. This is a rule those of us who live online all know. But, Amy spends most of her time in the kitchen. So, it’s possible she and Samy had no idea what the online world of trolls can become. They found out the hard way. It was Yelpers, quite possibly trolls, who suggested “Amy’s Baking Company” for an episode of “Kitchen Nightmares.” When the first show aired back in 2013, it became an internet sensation, the videos of the episode went viral. People like me who had never heard of  Gordon Ramsay or “Kitchen Nightmares” (which was in its 6th season by then) watched the episode – and re-watched it. (I adore Amy!) It’s safe to say that it’s the most watched episode of that perfectly awful reality show – ever. It may, also, have been Ramsay’s undoing in the end. The Bouzaglos were determined that if Ramsay was going to destroy them, they wouldn’t go down with out a fight and they wouldn’t go down alone.

When I titled this blogpost, I used the word, “deception,” to describe what happened to Amy and Samy Bouzaglo at the hands of Ramsay and his minions, paid and unpaid. But, I wanted to use the word, “fraud.” Fraud is a strong word and it has some legal connotations, so I chose the word “deception,” instead. But, I think it is not at all wrong to call what was done here “fraud.” Some victims of similar reality show shenanigans have sued. The most infamous example I can remember off the top of my head was that of the Jenny Jones Show (I’m dating myself and my television viewing, again, here!) back in 1997 when Jenny Jones invited a non-gay man onto the show to meet his crush, who turned out to be another man. The surprised guest was so humiliated that he ended up murdering the other man – a big lawsuit followed.

Here’s some more information about the fraudulent nature of talk-reality shows in an old video clip, involving that episode of the Jenny Jones Show. Here’s another documentary from HBO from 1997 on these old talk shows: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJJVE2gqjOc . Here is a clip from Jenny Jones at trial. I, also, had colleagues who appeared on some of these talk shows in an effort to promote their careers (to get credits, which get you higher paid bookings with agencies and night clubs) who told me they were heavily edited and the show was made to look very different from what actually happened. For instance, Howard Stern edited his show, I was told privately by a former guest, so that the women who appear on it look as sleazy and cheap as possible. There’s no way to get the upper hand in any conversation with the host because they edit the show and make the guest appear however they want her to appear. Another woman I worked with did promotions for a major (MAJOR, but now defunct) night club in NYC back in the 1990s and the talk shows invented a non-existent pop-cultural phenomenon and tried to convince audiences it was a real thing in order to get ratings for themselves and the shows guests (including my colleague) were hired actors (complete with SAG membership cards), paid to promote the club, which is why they appeared on the show and told a pack of lies to an international audience.

Amy and Samy might have had grounds for a lawsuit. But, they said they are not litigious, although they believe (and so do I) they should have been compensated for their participation in the show, instead they wanted to expose Ramsay and “Kitchen Nightmares.” This, despite the fact that they may have been subjected to a “non-disclosure” clause of some type in their contract (reminiscent of the famously litigious Donald Trump and his silencing tactics).

In the beginning, they believed Ramsay and his producers when they said he was going to help them and the only problem their restaurant had, at that time, was an online troll one. Instead, he aggravated their online troll problem, which had previously only been local, and turned it into a nation-wide troll attack. Amy’s Baking Company became, as Amy described it in the second episode of Kitchen Nightmares, “Disneyland for the crazies.”

So much is disturbing about how Amy was treated by Gordon Ramsay that it’s hard to determine where to start in describing it. A lot of the false characterizations he made of her are based on both gendered and sexist stereotypes. He says she is “crazy.” He doesn’t use the exact word “shrew,” but he puts forth the idea that she is a tyrant who is feared by her husband. He badgers her. When she tries to talk to him, he lets her finish half of a sentence before he uses her words to interrupt her, speak over her, and continue to harangue her. She reveals in one of the radio interviews that Ramsay came into the kitchen where she was working with a female employee and sexually harassed Amy to the point of tears by harping on the size and condition of her husband’s balls while making the accusation that her husband feared her.

It’s reminiscent of how Stanley Kubrick nearly drove Shelley Duvall to a nervous breakdown in order to get the reaction he wanted from her on film for “The Shining!” There really ought to be a law against treating women worse than circus animals! But, we all know that’s not going to happen anytime soon.

It, also, reminds me of high school bullies, as exemplified by “Mean Girls,” which is the level at which Ramsay appears to operate. In the original 2013 episode, when Ramsay first comes into the restaurant he is very complimentary and friendly-seeming. Amy’s Baking Company wasn’t like most of the crummy joints featured on his television show. It was a million dollar-plus spread, with beautiful checkerboard tile floors, a gilded decor, an al fresco dining area, and shiny display cases full of Amy’s beautiful desserts and pastries. The kitchen was pristine. The food in the refrigerators was stored and dated in an example of perfect organization.

He tries one of the desserts. He likes it. He compliments the cleanliness and organization of the kitchen. Then, he talks to Amy and Samy, who are now very relaxed and comfortable with him. But, it’s all a Regina George-style set up. He gets them to talk about themselves. He asks them if they have children. (I find the child question appalling, by the way. Lots of people, especially women, have health problems, have hysterectomies due to some disorder or as the result of horrific rapes, have endometriosis, have miscarriages, have lost an unborn child to male violence – there is an endless number of scenarios. There are, also, many moral, ethical and highly personal reasons that women do not use their wombs to make children. It’s not a nice question and it’s a rudely presumptuous one.)  Amy jokes that they have three little boys, but they are trapped in cat bodies.

They obviously treat their cats like children and one of the clips they most like to use to show that Amy is a “crazy cat lady”is where she is talking about how she speaks to the cats and they talk and sing back. They took this lighthearted moment and turned it into something to demean her in a particularly misogynistic way. This characterization gave way to cartoons (memes) depicting her as a witch. Amy has been able to find some humor in this and on the surface, I see it, too. Nonetheless, there is something deeply hateful, Medievally hateful, in fact, about it. There is something terrifying on a primal level about being publicly called a witch – whether you really are one or not. (Amy is “God’s child,” according to one of her social media posts in response to being accused of being a witch. This means she is probably either Christian or Jewish and is not a conjurer or practitioner of the Dark Arts and, therefore, she is not a witch.) Historically, the “witch” label has been the pretext for unspeakable horrors committed by mobs, instigated and encouraged by those in positions of power – a lot like Ramsay and his legions of dudebros.

As he’s setting them up, he gets some other personal information about Samy, which seem to indicate that he once participated in some kind of alternative life-style. He has been called a “playboy,” which is a euphemism for all kinds of things and it is conveyed that he had, at least once, some criminal connections.

In fact, when the spaghetti hit the fan, one result was that people were digging into both of their pasts. Local news outlets and vloggers were milking their popularity for all it was worth. This resulted in some apparently false reports that Samy was in the country illegally (he is a naturalized American citizen, born in Morocco and a citizen of Israel, according to available information) and was on the verge of being deported. It was publicized that Amy was convicted and served time in prison for “banking fraud.” If you listen to the reports, they’d have you believe she was an embezzler. But, she was sentenced to 14-months for putting a social security number that wasn’t hers on an application for a $15,000 loan. I’m not saying that’s a right thing to do. It’s certainly not a smart thing to do. But, it’s not embezzling or theft and it does seem that the penalty was extremely heavy handed for a non-violent offence and her first and only offence, as far as I am aware. Consider that the Steubenville rapists only got one day in Juvie and the child rapist, Jeffrey Epstein, only served three months in a facility where he had the key to his own cell and was able to come and go freely. Something just seems wrong about this.

Any information that could be found about the two of them was being dug up and a lot of it stemmed from this friendly set up in the beginning in which Ramsay appeared trustworthy and conversational. This friendly conversational demeanor would not last, a pattern you will find in many other episodes of his show.

Most of the food that Amy prepares at the restaurant is made from scratch. Amy acknowledges that a few things are frozen, such as the ravioli. Ramsay fixates on this and runs it into the ground during the show. At no time in the show, does he really offer any constructive criticism. “It’s disgusting” and “it’s crap” seem to be the extent of it. I watched the first episode a few times trying to understand what was so bad about frozen raviolis. I still don’t know.

According to Amy in the radio interviews, Ramsay had them, for the purposes of the show, show a waitress. In fact, the restaurant doesn’t have waitresses. Instead, they have what they call “food runners” who are paid an hourly wage to simply pick up food from the kitchen and deliver it to the table. They don’t take orders or use the computer. This was changed for the show. Then, Ramsay made a big deal about how the waitresses (which the restaurant didn’t actually have) were not being tipped, claiming that the owner was stealing tips from the waitresses. This resulted in the restaurant being investigated by some government agency, but no wrong-doing was found. Nonetheless, this became more fodder for their enemies, a now huge body of nasty trolls, bullies and harassers who began threatening them and harassing them at their restaurant.

The night before Ramsay arrived, they filmed the restaurant, which according to Amy in her radio interviews and in the following article, they packed with actors and Yelpers, some of whom had physically threatened her and Samy online and who had been harassing them for about three years. There is sequence after sequence of people making faces and turning up their noses as they are served Amy’s food. This is something you will see in other episodes of “Kitchen Nightmares.” It’s obviously a set up for the show. These are actors and plants. More evidence for the fact that these were actors and paid instigators may be found at this article, in the Phoenix New Times, entitled “Screaming, Expletives, and, Eventually, Police: All in the First Night of Kitchen Nightmares Taping at Amy’s Baking Company,” in which there are descriptions and quotes from Amy (that she might have actually said and which indicate that she knew who some of the instigators were and that some were actors and she knew she was being “set up,” which is exactly what was happening) from that first night. You’ll see only clips of what happened in the show, all edited to make Amy and Samy look “crazy” and “paranoid.” (It’s not “paranoia” when you are really being set up!)  News articles like this one with quotes from the Kitchen Nightmares people allegedly saying “We’ve never seen anything like this,” pour gasoline on the flames and are an attempt to lend credibility to their fictional narrative.

Another “waitress” appearing in the show was fired by Amy for “simply asking a question.” But, if you watch the show carefully, you see the look on the girl’s face and according to Amy, she had been difficult all night (she says this in one of the radio interviews) and this was the last straw. There is a clip of Amy on the show saying, “Why are you acting like this?” After watching the show a few times, it looks like this girl was put up to her behavior for the purposes of the show. She gives a number of interviews in both the first and second episodes disparaging and ridiculing Amy.

There are, also, apparent patrons (which you will learn from the interviews from Amy were Yelpers, there to cause trouble) who caused difficulties over a pizza and were kicked out of the restaurant by Amy.

Upon re-watching, it is easy to see that the whole “show” is one big set up with a lot of editing to make Amy appear crazy and irrational as Ramsay and his plants try to drive her insane – literally. This is what we call “gaslighting.” The absurd number of alleged customers sending the food back, claiming it’s no good, for instance, is gaslighting. It’s often done by men to women to slowly drive us crazy. To make us doubt ourselves. To frustrate us. To cause us to defend ourselves against charges that we’re not crazy (not witches, not shrews), etc., which is just used as more fodder and more “proof” that it’s all true. To prove that Amy was “crazy” lots of online bullies created memes and videos showing still shots of Amy from the show with her eyes wide open. One idiot male vlogger made a video with a still of this claiming that it was proof that she was psychotic and demonically possessed. Near the end of the first episode, Amy calls him out on what he has done and Ramsay says to Amy, “Blaming everyone again” in the exact same tone of voice as Charles Boyer talking to Ingrid Bergman in the movie, Gaslight. He calls her “delusional.” When Amy says, “Can I show you reviews, hundreds of reviews, that we didn’t write that are from real customers?” He says, “Online bullies again,” as if he’s not aware of the problem – as if she is imagining it. The dialogue might have been taken straight from the script of that film because this is exactly how men who gaslight women behave – this is what they say and how they say it.

When the show aired, it got some press, as well, showing up in national news headlines. That’s when people on the internet (like me, who don’t see T.V. usually) got wind of it. Then, the nastiness multiplied exponentially. Samy and Amy got threats over the phone, they had prank callers (lots of loser men have posted videos of themselves harassing Samy and Amy, mostly on the telephone to disrupt their business and inflict psychological harm), people making fake reservations, and people coming from all over out of state to check out the restaurant. Some of those tourists generated by the show and its fallout did some awful things. But, a whole lot of other people actually tried Amy’s cooking and loved it. They couldn’t understand why they were portrayed as the worst restaurant in the country on the television show.

The bottom line is this: Television is fake. Pretty much everything you see on there including the news is fake. The people you see in reality shows and often on talk shows (although that format nearly died after the Jenny Jones Show debacle) are often actors, people who are not actors are manipulated and psychologically tortured in order to get a desired reaction, and the shows are as scripted as any other fictional programming.

Amy says in her radio interviews that she wants people to know that reality shows are fake and she doesn’t want anyone else to fall for this con artistry. They have done their best to expose Gordon Ramsay for what he is. “Kitchen Nightmares” is over.

Meanwhile, Amy has put out her first book, which I will review in the next post. She’s, also, got some very nice videos on fancy baking and pastry-making. She’s had some problems with trolls, though, apparently. I noticed that she’s had to create, at least, three different channels because YT keeps taking them down. There is a real dearth of women making videos and posting them at YT. They have a man problem over there and that is the bulk of Amy’s trolls, which you’ll find if you do a search on her name or restaurant at YT. A lot of what has happened to Amy is simply woman-hating. If she were a man, it probably wouldn’t have happened. What Ramsay and the trolls have done to her has really taken a toll on her health. None of this is surprising to radical feminists, of course, and it’s all happened despite the fact that she is married to a man.

Amy Bouzaglo really has a larger than life personality. I am really hoping to see more of her, but if she becomes a recluse (like me), I can certainly understand why.

Additional material:

In the Kitchen Nightmare show and in the radio interviews, Amy makes reference to problems with Yelp. Ramsay, whose production company appears to have been working with Yelpers, acts like this is a ridiculous idea. Although, there have been many suits and many more allegations against Yelp for extortionist practices. In the video below, restaurant owners discuss a three-part series of events that plays out like this: (1) A restaurant gets legitimate good (4 and 5 star) reviews; (2) The restaurant begins receiving calls from sales reps from Yelp asking them to pay for advertising; (3) if the restaurant doesn’t pay, the good reviews disappear and any bad reviews rise to the top of their site.

Here’s a business-owner talking about his experiences with Yelp:

Billion Dollar Bully – this is a trailer for a documentary about Yelp’s alleged bullying and extortion of business-owners:

Season 9, Episode 14 of South Park, “You’re Not Yelping,” humorously brings to light the nature of Yelp reviewers and their arrogance, bullying and extortion of restaurant owners:

http://southpark.cc.com/full-episodes/s19e04-youre-not-yelping

A video about Yelp and the lawsuits against them involving allegations of extortion and threats of physical harm if they did not pay. This and these other videos are relevant to the story of Amy’s Baking Company because they fully support her allegations:

Chef suicides and restaurant closings are elements in the wake of destruction that seems to have followed Gordon Ramsay and his reality television shows:

BBC News: ‘MasterChef’ runner-up Josh Marks commits suicide
Rachel Brown, contestant on “‘Hell’s Kitchen,’ found dead in Bedford
Most Restaurants on Kitchen Nightmares Are Now Closed
Joseph Cerniglia, ‘Kitchen Nightmares’ Suicide — Second for Chef Gordon Ramsay’s Shows

 

War Officially Declared on White Women by Black Men and Women

The purpose of this post: To warn my sisters of rhetoric that has now turned to physical violence and to remind you that we do not need other people to do the feminist work that needs to be done at this time because most of it is based on dispensing information, which has been suppressed and is generally not available in the mainstream of male-dominated life.

On August 26, 2015, blonde-haired, blue-eyed Alison Parker was reportedly murdered on live-air by a black man who declared in his manifesto that he hated “white women” and he wanted a “race war.” There is nothing “senseless” about this or the unprovoked murder of a white cop in Harris County, Texas reported on the night of August 28, 2015. The problem is not “crazy people” and it isn’t a problem of access to guns. If you examine the information at the websites linked below, you will see that it makes perfect sense. Furthermore, your survival may depend on understanding it.

In the past few months various black leaders have encouraged black people to kill white people (which includes women) and police officers.

White women are being attacked by tranny men who want our space, who want to be in our very skins, by black feminists, by black men who see us as “disposable fuck toys,” by race-baiting, hetero-normative liberals and, as always, by white men who have waged war on us for thousands of years wherever we are. None of these wars have been officially declared until now.

I will provide information about this below. My advice to my white sisters, if you want to take it and I hope you will, is to stop apologizing to anyone, stop explaining yourselves to anyone who says you are not doing feminism correctly. These are not your friends and they don’t have reasonable points, anyway. The lives of white women are very different and we have every right to talk about the horrific ways in which we are being targeted. Because of the power of the liberals and their influence on feminism, I have hesitated to talk about the horrors faced by white women because many of these things are regarded as “white privilege” by men and liberal feminists and, also, I have a desire to be inclusive because I love all women and I love our diversity. But, it’s time to talk more about things like white slavery, the trafficking of white American women overseas, the objectification of ordinary women going about their business (see previous post), the pursuit of white women for pornography and other aspects of the so-called “sex industry” and the general targeting of white women. Our enemies have tried to silence us and I have stayed silent about my own experiences in the past, but no more!

Liberals hate us – male and female, they hate us! They especially hate light complected women (and any women who, by accident of birth, conform to the white male’s standard of beauty) and I don’t know how many times I’ve read about a crime committed against a black person and looked at the comment section to see people urging that the same crimes be done to a white woman. We have a lot of enemies. We must not dismiss what they are saying to us as just talk or they don’t really mean it.

Meanwhile, I encourage you, especially if you look white – because, let’s face it this is all about your appearance, not your race, not your ancestors, not who you are  (Alison Parker may have been Jewish) – especially if you are light skinned and light eyed, to take special precautions at this time. WAR HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DECLARED ON US simply because we exist and we are perceived (not only by men, but many black women) as the property of the white man.

Since the apparent murder of Alison Parker and the shooting of another blonde woman, who was left for dead by the black male killer, for no reason other than she was a white woman, I have been doing some digging around in some areas of the World Wide Web that I would not normally venture into. What I have found there is disturbing.

Black feminists have been telling us to sit down and shut up, white bitch. But, now, it appears that lots of black women and men are calling for our deaths and acting out violence on us, which has gone mostly unreported by the national news.

Here are examples of what black feminists have been saying to white feminists:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-we-need-to-talk-about-white-feminism_55c8ca5ce4b0f73b20ba020a – here we are told that our experiences and our lives do not matter.

http://thesaladbowl.kinja.com/white-girl-sit-down-1715623861 – This one contains a link to the snuff video in which Rhianna kidnaps a white woman in order to get revenge on a white man (because women are male property, of course), it is full of hateful slurs against women and has been applauded by the left and many black women have defended it. We must not be silenced by our enemies, so when they tell you to “sit down and shut up,” it’s important to keep talking about our lives and our experiences and warning other targets. We must keep repeating to (to ourselves and others) that we are not objects and we are not property.

More defending the snuff video, referenced above: http://www.blackgirldangerous.org/2015/07/this-is-what-rihannas-bbhmm-video-says-about-black-women-white-women-and-feminism/#main-navigation – the author declares, without providing one shred of evidence, that white women are harming black women and, somehow, we benefit from causing them to suffer.

Some white, liberal, “sex positive” feminists have swallowed this hateful rhetoric and are regurgitating it: http://bellejar.ca/2015/03/08/4389/ – and we don’t need this, either!

Here’s another one from a #BlackLivesMatter feminist, in which the author asserts that any kindness and outreach on the part of white women is highly suspicious. So, we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t, it seems – nothing new here for us: http://www.forharriet.com/2015/07/no-time-for-white-guilt-why-im.html#axzz3kVGOLnHX But, I don’t think these #BlackLivesMatters feminists need to worry about hordes of white women rushing to be their allies, anyway, since we generally don’t align ourselves with people who advocate or support the murder of ourselves, our children, our family members, cops or men, in general. We are women. We are powerful. We are the only ones on this planet with the power to create human life, which is exactly why we don’t need to murder anyone to achieve our goals.

Make no mistake, black feminists who harbor completely misdirected hatred toward white women, are at the foundation of the #BlackLivesMatter movement, which has meshed with the New Black Panthers and other violent black groups, as discussed in this article: http://magazine.good.is/features/black-lives-matter-feminism-history The contents of this article are absolutely disgusting. In it, a black feminist express venomous hatred of white women who have done nothing to them. Reading this is a lot like visiting an MRA site for the first time – it explains a whole lot of things that were not entirely clear before.

Here are videos in which they call for us to be murdered:

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/28/black-activists-called-for-lynching-and-hanging-of-white-people-and-cops/ – See the video, which was broadcast the night before the black male murdered Alison Parker and shot another blonde woman, in which a black man and woman urge black people to murder white people and cops and photograph it. Warning: Extremely profane!

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/09/sandra-bland-protest-all-white-people-should-be-killed-with-video/ – more profanity (also, this video auto-plays when you go to the page).

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/26/fukyoflag-threatens-veteran-pregnant-wife-and-fing-piece-of-s-unborn-creature/

Full length call for lynching of white people (people, in this case, includes white women and children as the property of the white man) and cops, “somebody needs to become a sacrifice”: http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/71783139

(Update 8:31 – Right now the above link is still working, but in case the above podcast has gone or does go missing, this might explain what happened: http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/30/texas-podcast-that-called-for-killing-cops-goes-missing-after-execution/ )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97Y9FjtQ5Wc – This an influential religious leader, Louis Farrakahn, calling for the murder of white people (including women because women are people only when men say we are) and police. He is a very influential leader of primarily black men, but many black women, also, listen and obey when this man speaks.

This is from about 3 years ago. Here a man and woman call for the murder of blonde-haired, blue-eyed people (“people” includes women who are seen as property of the white man), in defense of “the black man.” Again, profanity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eseHDyaip0U

In the past year or more, and increasingly in the past few months, there have been innumerable attacks on white women by black men and women. Therefore, I urge you to re-evaluate your safety at – this time.

This is an example of the kind of targeted attacks on white women that have not been making the national news while they tell us repeatedly about how only the lives of criminal black men matter:

This is from about two years ago:

http://6abc.com/news/south-philly-neighborhood-rallies-to-stop-attacks/763459/ – these kinds of attacks have been going on for two years and finally some people rally publicly to try to stop it. Why has this not been reported in the national news? Why are we not finding it at liberal websites like RawStory and Jezebel?

My updated safety rules for women (in the U.S., which is where this black male and black female violence against women is occurring right now) are as follows:

When you are in a public place, be aware of who is watching you – more than usual. White men and black men and women are involved in movements like #BlackLivesMatter and black men and women have carried out many violent attacks on white women for their cause.

Try to keep a distance, a larger than usual personal space, between yourself and others who might perpetrate a violent act.

Avoid gatherings and avoid crowds, especially those that might contain people who have declared they want to kill you.

Stay armed and be ready to take cover or defend yourself.

Remember that you are more vulnerable alone, especially since they have said they are looking for white people alone to kill.

Try to avoid the cops whose adrenaline and testosterone is higher than ever now and who are just as likely as ever to rape and kill women and enable other men to do the same. Just because we have been named as targets along with them does not mean they are not the same anti-woman patriarchal establishment they have always been. Therefore, try to stay out of any circumstance in which you might have to have contact with them, especially now, when they are emotionally worked up and more likely than ever to be violent toward women. Also, know that despite the #blacklivesmatter and other liberal rhetoric, white women are the largest demographic raped and murdered by police. Here’s an example of a such a case, which you’ve probably not heard about: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/dashcam-cops-kill-unarmed-mother-applaud-marksmanship-brag-face-exploding/ and for more information and pictures of her (she was very beautiful) see: http://investigations.myajc.com/caroline-small-shooting/ So, don’t buy the liberal’s story that white women are not subjected to extreme police violence – they want these things to happen to white women, they say it over and over, again. (I have many personal stories, involving rape and stalking by cops – some of it is so bad, I still can’t talk about it many years later. I believe white women are especially targeted for sadistic sexual violence by cops.)

Remember that your enemy is not just the white man, who wants to hurt or kill us because we won’t lie down and let him stick his dick in us – it is all men and some women who are working side by side with them: https://waronwhitegirls.wordpress.com/2015/06/12/warning-white-women-declared-1-enemy/ ALL men hate us and have the potential to be violent toward us.

Stay anonymous in this new McCarthyite era.

We do not need people who hate us in our groups or in our discussions. We do not need people who keep saying, “What about me!” – whether it’s men or trannies or black women telling us to shut up. Our lives and our experiences do matter and we have the right to talk about them and to talk about possible solutions without being shouted down by narcissists who want us dead. We try to be nice, but that doesn’t work. We protest that we are all on the same team. But, they’ve already decided what we are (“racist white bitches”), so it doesn’t matter. You don’t have to include people in your groups or your circle of friends who hate you, who are trying to undermine what you are trying to accomplish.

And, what I am trying to accomplish is simply this: I want to warn other women. I want to warn young girls. I want to tell you that you do not have to have a life that centers around men or even includes men. You live your life for yourself and let your allies, whether you are lesbian, straight or asexual, be other women – those who are worthy of you, who aren’t trying to take something away from you and talking about how you don’t matter. Form your bonds with other like-minded women. You do not have to include all women, especially those who are telling you to shut up because what they have to say is more important and being targeted by white men is some kind of privilege. We don’t have to listen to this anymore or try to appease these women, anymore, because we see that their true colors are showing. They are not just telling us shut up, anymore, they are advocating and, in many cases, perpetrating violence against us. We don’t need to appease them or try to get along with them simply because WE DO NOT NEED THEM to get the message out to the women and girls who need to hear it.

I’d, also, like to remind the black men involved in this race war that they will not win. Your leaders are hired provocateurs and their entire purpose is to cooperate with the white men in power, in hopes of sharing that power, and they are setting you up. They are selling you out right now and bathing in your blood. Maybe you’ll get joy out of murdering more cops and white women for a little while, but this is not going to end well for you. See video below for why (more profanity, of course):

I am not taking any commentary from anyone on this article. I have spoken to my audience and I hope you will heed my advice. Whatever anyone else has to say on this subject, I’ve already heard and I’m done listening to it. I’m not going to appease anyone who wants to suck my blood or see me dead. My sisters are the only ones I care about and I don’t see anyone else talking about this subject yet – maybe they don’t know or maybe they are afraid to, but we already have a whole mob of white men on the net trying to kill us, so what’s a few more million black men and women.

Related links:

Woman who urges black people to kill all white people plans a special event on 9/11/2015: http://popularmilitary.com/woman-planning-fck-your-flag-day-on-911-says-all-white-people-must-die/

(Posted 8/31/2015: Armed black men and women shout at texas cops, say they “will start creeping up on you in the darkness.  http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/31/armed-black-panthers-to-texas-cops-we-will-start-creeping-up-on-you-in-the-darkness/ )

Blonde Women at a Sorority Targeted, Again – This Time by Liberals Instead of Elliot Rodger

Elliot Rodger, the California mass killer who targeted “blonde sluts” at a sorority who didn’t even know he existed – literally didn’t know, until he started shooting at them – was angry with women, particular women that he projected his own sick thoughts and delusions on.

Well, it happened, again, but the perp wasn’t a mass shooter this time. Instead it was a hit opinion piece by someone named A.J. Bailey, which you will find here: http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/08/bama_sorority_video_worse_for.html

What is not mentioned in this article or ANYWHERE else that I’ve seen in the numerous articles about this that I’ve looked at is that this objectifying film – and it is objectifying – was made by two males. There is a crotch shot. And, there is a bit of film of one of the women sitting down on a wooden bench that has clearly been manipulated by the video-makers to make it look like she is twerking. Not one critic has said anything about the two perverts with cameras who made the video, although plenty has been said about the “whores,” “sluts,” “bimbos” and “racist bitches” who appear in this promotional film, which was supposed to be a recruiting tool for their sorority.

Bailey criticized this video for it’s lack of diversity. There are no apparent black men or women in it and none of the women there look like tranny men. Also, most of the women are blonde and blue-eyed and have fair, flawless skin. Apparently, this is some sort of crime for which women deserve to be tortured and die, or at least, should not be allowed to show their faces in public.

Well-groomed, well-dressed, homogenous, asexual, non-inclusive, blonde-haired, blue-eyed witch.

Well-groomed, well-dressed, homogenous, asexual, non-inclusive, blonde-haired, blue-eyed witch – not here to satisfy anyone’s lust.

I have some news for liberals. There are whole entire parts of this country filled with white people, where the women in the population look like the young women in this video. They are not “air-brushed.” They don’t look this way to “attract a man” or to tittillate anyone. They are not doing it on purpose to piss off liberals. This is just how they look. I know because I live in such an area in what liberals disparagingly call “fly-over country.” Here 97% of the population, according to the last census, is Caucasian. The rest is American Indian. We have almost no black people here – not because we killed them all! – but, because they never were here, historically. We have no history of black slavery here. Of course, this doesn’t stop the liberal hyenas in the press and in the comment sections from making historically inaccurate and disparaging remarks about us daily, if not hourly.

When I watch these videos, I see young women having fun together – doing what women wish we could do with each other without interference from men (except for those objectifying crotch shots and such from the cameramen, of course). Young women having innocent fun together is not a crime. It is something to be encouraged.

But, liberals seem to be upset at this “pornographic” video in which none of the women are taking it up the ass by a member of a minority group. Because this is not happening, a whole lot of presumptions are made about these women and their character. For instance, they must be racists! Many deeply offensive and hurtful assumptions are made about the women’s sexuality

Being born with pale skin, blonde hair and blue eyes does not make a person racist.

Being born female with pale skin, blonde hair and blue eyes does not make a person automatically heterosexual. It doesn’t make a person any kind of sexual. I can testify that blonde-haired, blue-eyed women with pale skin exist, who are positively ASEXUAL! Imagine that, if you can, you liberals and Elliot Rodgers of the world.

Such women do not NEED MINORITIES to fuck them in order to teach them some kind of a lesson.

Furthermore, simply because a woman is standing somewhere or appears in a video somewhere and she has blonde-hair and blue eyes, this does not mean that she is coming on to you, that she is offering herself to you sexually or in any other way.

Surprise! Surprise! Blonde-haired, blue-eyed women are people, too, and they exist with their own individual personalities – despite being told that they are “cookie cutter cutouts,” “clones” and “Barbies” and have no brains! – they do exist and they have a right to exist for themselves and not for you to masturbate to or to disparage or to turn their existence into one big, long porno movie.

I want to say more about this, but this right here is an example of why we need radical feminism. Often white women are accused of dominating feminism, but what else do we have? Who else will speak up for us and defend us, if not ourselves? Clearly, no one.

The person who wrote this article, this Bailey, took me back to my middle school days.I had to leave school because of all the violence and sexual assault – the pivotal issue being my blond-hair and general appearance, which I had no control over, especially at about 12 or 13-years old. I remember my mother saying to me that the reason some people acted this way toward me was because I was blonde-haired and they wished they were blonde, too. I don’t know if this is true, but the adolescent envy I experienced then – no less violent and dangerous – I re-experienced while reading this article. It’s too bad that some people, for instance, hateful liberals and violent perverts like Elliot Rodger, just can’t seem to leave other people alone. They are driven by their envy and hatred of other people who usually don’t even know they exist until they strike!

And, now this video by this sorority has been removed. It wasn’t removed because the women were performing racist chants or singing about the joys of raping dead women, like some fraternities that have recently appeared in the news. No, it was taken down because the blond-haired blue-eyed women in the video were not “inclusive” of whatever people liberals thought they should be inclusive of. It was removed because nobody can just let innocent young women be just that and because a bunch of perverted men (and the liberal women who support their point of view) think everything any woman does is about THEM! They just can’t leave women alone and they can’t stand it when other people are happy or when they think somebody else has something they don’t have.

Note: I didn’t realize it when I wrote the headline above, but the Alpha Phi sorority was the exact same one that was targeted by Elliot Rodger last year. See the article here: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-isla-vista-shooting-sororities-members-on-edge-20140526-story.html  Bailey should hang his or her head in shame for writing this disturbing opinion piece because it is these mean, ignorant and perverse popular characterizations of innocent women, such as those in this video, that encourage such senseless, targeted (I refuse to say “random,” when it is clear that it is targeted) male violence against women.