The Push to Normalize Pedophilia and the Demonic Male

I was going to do separate posts about each of the two subjects in the title: The incessant male sexual perversion we female human beings are surrounded by and the demonic male. But, I have trouble separating these two subjects, anyway, and then I read a post by NoMorePaperTowels, entitled “Being Able to Say ‘No’ is Sexual Freedom, ” which is a rational refutation of an article, “Will the Left Turn on Sexual Freedom,” by Damon Linker.

Before I get to the substance of her article, I’d like to mention what stood out to me about this dudebro’s name. I laughed out loud when I read this guy’s name, which could be a pen name or maybe it’s really his legal name. But, I have noticed that men often tell us what they are in little ways. I’ve had men say, “I’m an onasshole,” under their breath while I was on a date with them, years ago, and this was my clue that they were plotting some evil against me, that some horrible, violent thoughts were going through their minds. They seem to get off on giving us clues about themselves and their motives, sometimes it’s subtle, sometimes it’s more direct.

This guy’s name says what he is. “Damon” is an old name from Greek, which means “subduer” or “subjugater.” His last name, “Linker,” is a term frequently used in the German news these days to describe “lefties” or “left-wingers.” So, this guy’s name means “left-wing subjugater.” This made me laugh. Then, I clicked on the link to the article and there is a picture of this guy. Now, “Damon,” sounds a lot like “Demon,” and if you look at this guy’s picture and just pull away from your computer screen a little bit, he’s got little tufts of hair on each side of his head that – I swear! – look like devil-horns! LOL!

Men really are telling us who and what they are, if we only observe and listen!

Back to NMPT’s post, which is a commentary on an article written by the demonic left-wing subjugater: NMPT points out that, once again, women are not being regarded as human beings with basic human and civil rights with respect to being able to say “No” to sexually predatory males. Saying the word, “No,” to men and to contact with men is, in fact, sexual freedom. The men regularly argue that we should not be able to refuse contact with them because it is a violation of men’s rights to sex. This concept of men’s rights to sex and sexual rights, in general, is rife with problems and we are seeing the idea put forth more and more with regard to such issues as Amnesty’s International’s Refusal to acknowledge women and girls as human beings with a right not to be trafficked and prostituted, with the legally sanctioned intrusion of males into female safe spaces such as restrooms and locker rooms, and with the push to lower the legal age of consent and promote pedophilia. The push may appear to be coming from the left, but it is both the left-wing and the Christian conservatives who are pushing it. Again, the problem isn’t really left or right, it isn’t a race or even a religion, but it is MEN who are doing this.

The demonic left-wing subjugater seems to be very confused about a few things in his article. Not only does he fail to understand that women are human beings, but he uses the term, “moral libertarianism,” over and over. First of all, the idea behind Libertarianism is morality. I tried to look up the term, “moral libertarianism,” and could not find a definition. It is possible that the author is confusing the term “Libertarianism” with “libertinism.” This seems to be the case, although, his confusion carries over into his politics and he, also, refers to Rand Paul as a Libertarian. Paul is a Republican and has publicly stated that he is not a Libertarian. His father ran on the Libertarian ticket for president back in the 1990s, but he is a poor representative of the party’s platform.

The Libertarians have suffered, in the past few decades, from an influx of men who are very good at recognizing the  civil rights of men, but very bad at recognizing that those same rights apply to women. This is a problem among Republicans and Democrats, as well. All three of these parties are dominated by men. The author of the original article says that Libertarians have “a laissez-faire attitude toward sex.” I don’t know what he thinks that means. What it does mean is that Libertarians do not believe in trying to legislate sexual behaviors, in general. Although, it is a major tenet in Libertarianism that you can do what you want as long as you don’t violate the rights of others. So, not legislating the sexual behavior of adults does not mean that it’s okay to rape women and children – which is how the author of the article seems to view this statement.

I can only assume based on the context of the rest of the article he wrote that the author is actually talking about “moral libertinism,” which is an absolute contradiction in terms. A libertine is a man who is devoid of moral or sexual restraint. So, let me make a quick list of the things this guy has gotten wrong so far:

  • He thinks women have no right to say “No” because it interferes with men’s sexual freedom.
  • He thinks the Republican, Rand Paul, is a Libertarian despite the fact that Paul has repeatedly denied this and his political views reflect that he is, in fact, not a Libertarian.
  • He thinks that “Libertarian” and “libertine” are somehow equivalent terms and uses them as such after the introductory paragraphs of his article.

When I go back and read the article using the term “libertinism” in place of his “libertarianism” it begins to make slightly more sense. Although, I am still unclear on what is moral about immorality. This is an oxymoron. I re-read the article and when I got to the conclusion I was still baffled by what he is trying to say here, but I do see that he is speaking about “morality” from an entirely male perspective. Thank goodness I have NMPT to sort it out for me. It’s like having a translator. She is translating his Liberalese into something I can understand. But, it’s more than just Liberalese – this is men’s language, it’s all coming from a semen-drenched point-of-view, which is, also, why it is baffling.

The Push for Sexual Rights: The Dangers are Becoming More Evident

To me “sexual rights for all” is a lot like “patriarchal health care for all” or “freedom to worship God whichever way you choose.” These ideas are all prisons.

The idea that we all must have a sexual “orientation” is pushed – not having sexual contact is not an option, at least, not for girls and women. It’s an old sales trick. When you want someone to buy what you’re selling, you don’t give them the option to say, “No.” What you do is present them with a dichotomy: Are you heterosexual or homosexual?

This is what they started doing, in my memory, back in the 1990s. When I was in school, nobody talked much about homosexuality. “Gay” was just a word to call someone, often as a joke. I didn’t know what a lesbian was, had never even heard the term before, until probably my senior year in high school (1983 or 1984) and then I had only a vague idea. Then, I saw the media and the public schools pushing homosexuality. I remember catching a glimpse of a television show in which the teacher stood before a class and wrote on a chalkboard that we are all a little bit homosexual. He presented a chart that looked like a gasoline gauge and he asked the students to consider where they fell on this sexuality chart. This idea became prevalent – that we are all a little bit homosexual and if we deny that, we are homophobic. (Does this sound, at all familiar?! Say, “No,” to men and you are some kind of phobiac.)

What is not allowed is the possibility for women or girls to say, “No, I do not hunger for dick, neither do I have sexual urges for other girls or women.” The girls and women – who quite likely, if they were anything like me and Shere Hite’s work suggests that most are – are probably confused about what the term “sexuality” really means in anything other than an academic sense.

When you are doing sales work, you might present your prospect with more than two options. Again, this does not give them the opportunity to say, “No,” and, if they object, you have a scripted response to their objections to put them back on the track where you want their thinking to go. In sales, we don’t want to overwhelm our prospect with options or else they might walk away, but we can present them with some other ideas to sell the idea that sexuality is inherent to all, desirable for all, that there must be sexual freedom for all – although, we’ve already determined that this does not include the option to say, “No.”

So, they began to present different options: Are you bi-sexual? Are you bi-curious? Are you a trans-sexual? 

And, now, it goes on, they are adding more options: What gender are you? Then, there is a long list of supposed genders. Along with these there is a wide range of sexual orientations.

One of the new sexual orientations is “pedophile.” There is a huge push to normalize this as simply part of “sexual freedom for all.” Of course, it does not consider the child in the “all” anymore than women are considered as part of the “all.”

This hyper-sexualized, sperm-drenched world we are living in is the true meaning of “It’s a man’s world.”

We have all been “pitched” this idea by some master salesmen, some men who have mastered psychology and how people respond. They know how to overcome your objections and, of course, where women and girls are concerned, that includes violence! It includes social and religious coercion. It starts young.

To continue the analogy I made at the beginning to this idea of “sexual freedom for all” being like religion and patriarchal medicine, if you object to these other two ideas, you will get a similar salesman-like response.

For instance, I have had religious people tell me that “freedom of religion” does not include “freedom from religion.” Here in the states, this is usually a reference to our 1st Amendment, which does guarantee, in fact, freedom from religion. But, religious people will just give you a belligerent, nonsense response like that and stick with it – it’s the equivalent of calling someone a homophobe or a transphobe because they don’t want to engage in sexual behaviors, they want to keep their vaginas and other body parts to themselves. This is not an option.

In the case of Obamacare or universal health care, you get a zombie-like response from people that health insurance is a right, which makes no sense. Insurance companies do not have a right to anyone’s money simply because they say so. Even when you state your very valid objections to allopathic medicine. They will insist that their medical system is the only legitimate one and you must pay for them to use it. Since a lot of the people who object to allopathic medicine, the vocal ones, anyway, are Christians who believe in faith healing, you will likely be brushed off as a religious kook. This is a way for them to refuse to look at the facts, to think only about their own selfish motives and absolve themselves, in their own minds, from this responsibility. In a similar way, we are all pre-supposed to have sexual desires, especially girls and women are expected to have sexual desires for boys and we are not allowed to opt out. Like master salesmen, they simply refuse to hear our objection – our “No.”

When people – most people – think they have only one or two options, they will either comply or choose one of the options presented. Presenting people with a bunch of options, all of which are options you want them to choose and none of which are “No” or “I opt out” is a classic sales technique. It is manipulation and it is mind control.

What is “Morality” to Males?

Let me being by telling you what “morality” means to me as a woman. I’m, also, going to talk about what “morality” means within Libertarianism, since the demonic left-wing subjugater is trying to confuse people about this.

To me, morality is simply what is “right.” This is pretty much inherent, at least, in women. The laws and religious rules that have been set up are there to govern the predatory behavior of males toward females. The rules exit to mitigate male perversion.

To me, stealing is an example of something that is morally wrong. I don’t need a religious organization or a government entity to tell me this. But, men – who are the biggest class of thieves on this planet, who steal mostly from women – do need these laws and rules. They don’t enforce them well or at all most of the time, but they do have such rules and laws and this is why.

This is something I figured out years ago: The laws are there to control them. The “them” being the demons in the flesh – males. I really believe that if we had a nation or a society made up of entirely or mostly women, we would not need many or any laws.

Within the philosophy of Libertarianism, which really is more of a philosophy than it is a political party in many ways, morality stems from the basic concept of “right and wrong,” which is believed to be best represented by the U.S. Constitution. A whole lot of our law was based on the Magna Carta and Anglo-Saxon Common Law, which pre-dates Christianity and has a foundation in the basic concept of fairness. It means, for instance, we don’t steal from each other through taxation or other fraud. It means we don’t perpetrate acts of violence on other people. It means we do have a right to self-defense. And, we have a fundamental right to our property (the right to private property is a major concept in Libertarianism), which includes our own bodies.

Somehow, the demon left-wing subjugater seems to have the idea that Libertarianism is about Sex, Drugs & Rock ‘n’ Roll and this is not the case. It is, however, the natural interpretation of what I just said by a perpetually horny male who never graduated from adolescence.

“Morality” to men, more often than not, centers on their patriarchal religious establishments. They see everything in relation to the male and the male God,  who they invented and who is a reflection of their own degradation. Even men who say they are atheists hold this point of view. Even male Satanists see freedom from god as freedom from moral behavior as I described it above. They see it as license to harm other people, especially women and girls – and sometimes little boys.

We run up against this problem in paganism and it is something that has been discussed before. When you have men come into a group of pagan women, they usually see it as an opportunity to practice “libertinism” upon the women in the group – flirting, playing class clown, pawing and groping, and sometimes devising rituals or other situations in which they can sexually coerce or outright attack the women. In fact, every group starting with Gerald Gardner’s Wicca and moving on through LaVeyan Satanism and I have no idea what is going on now that I don’t want to know about – we see that men prey upon women’s liberation from Christianity. They take it as an opportunity to do more sexual harm in the name of either sexual freedom or religious freedom.

Male “morality” centers on the opportunity to fuck women and little girls. In their filthy, degenerate book, The Holy Bible, it says that men and women are to “go forth and multiply.” There are other passages about “storing treasure in heaven,” which the Quiverfull movement takes to mean providing bodies to souls and this is a way to acquire “credit” in the afterlife with God. The Mormons believe that the faster the women reproduce the sooner the Lord Jesus Christ will return to reign over them – they long for the apocalypse, which is why they are hell-bent on out-reproducing the Catholics. The Catholics do it ostensibly because they believe that sex for any other purpose than reproduction is a sin against God – that is you’re not supposed to do it recreationally. Again, this is obviously an edict for the males because it has been established (by Shere Hite, for which she was run out of the country) that most women do not derive pleasure from PIV (penis in vagina) sex. The real reason these perverts want to produce more children is because they are violent sex perverts who have sick urges to do violent things to children, especially little girls. But, more about this at a later time.

What is immoral to us is moral to men.

It is moral for men to have access to women and girls to fuck. The Bible says so. It says how to fuck us, when to fuck us, and details what is and what is not pleasing in the eyes of their perverted God character with regard to raping us. It blames us for not fighting back hard enough, for not crying out, for not choosing suicide – which they say is a mortal sin at any other time – over being fucked by a man.

Nobody ever asks our opinion about this because we are not allowed to have one. We are not allowed to opt out. Even when we scream, “No, ” we are not heard. Man’s focus remains on his dick and his sick perversions, which he projects on to women and little girls. He wants to fuck women and little girls, therefore, he believes that women and little girls want to be fucked by men. You will not be given the option to state your objection and even if you do you will be beaten down, called “slut” and “whore, be pelted with accusations and abuse. Men insist on putting their filth on women and girls.

When we are heard at all by men, from the male perspective, we have no validation because we are “immoral.” Our objections to having semen smeared on us and dicks poked into our orifices are deemed “immoral.” From his perspective, we are defying God. Our refusal to sexually submit, to be enslaved by males is a sin.

This applies even to atheist and Satanist males because they still believe that females are here to be sexually harmed by men, for their use and abuse as livestock, slaves, and vessels, and if we resist, we are doing something unnatural and wrong.

Furthermore, everything we do or don’t do with regard to males is taken as “consent” to their violence.

The Patriarchal Belief that Little Girls are Sexual Beings

The first sin was a sexual sin, according to the dominant religion. Although, there is some disagreement about what exactly happened. An earlier echo of the Biblical story says that Adam’s first female sex slave was Lilith, but she refused to be penetrated by his dick from underneath and wanted to be on top during sexual intercourse. Lilith does not object to dick, altogether, but just being on the bottom. She wants to be on top and this is evil, thus saith the Lord. So, she got in a snit, sprouted wings, and flew off to a mountain top where she had endless sex with all kinds of demons (demons must have dicks, I think it’s safe to say) and so God had to provide Adam with a second woman named Eve.

Eve, too, was an evil sexual temptress, who offered Adam an apple from a forbidden tree. This is often presumed to mean that she offered him her body to stick his dick in. At any rate, Eve is responsible for the so called “fall of man.” And, she is responsible for every other evil, horrible thing a man has ever done to her, her children, or this planet, thus saith the Lord. Because of Eve’s sexual insatiability, all girls are cursed and doomed to be a servant or “hand maiden” to a male. We are forbidden to speak during church meetings. We are accused of practicing witchcraft, as if it were a bad thing, and, of course, of desiring to be fucked by men – sometimes just one man and sometimes lots of men.

Christians (I don’t know about Jews or Muslims but that whole genital mutilation/bris thing makes me thing they have similar ideas and, of course, Judaism is the foundational religion to both Christianity and Islam) believe that little children are born with “sin.” They must be baptized so that these original sins of Eve will be washed away. There is a lot of discrepancy with regard to how soon or how late a child should be cleansed of this sin, though.

With the Mormons, it is quite late. They say 8-years old. With the Catholics and some others, the child must be saved by God, shortly after birth. The reason is that the child, unsaved, is in the hands of Satan and they believe it is Satan who acted through Eve. They, also, have a lot of writing about how girls and women are easily subject to Satan and are instruments of Satan.

In the churches, which are havens for pedophiles, it is believed that little girls tempt men to do sexually violent things to them. It is believed that the little girls, even little baby girls are temptresses, agents of the Living Devil, who work to bring down good men by means of their dicks.

This is one foundation for pedophilia in our society.  (I speak of the U.S. because it is what I know. I’m sure it applies equally well to other countries.) This is why the churches are rife with pedophiles and all manner of male perverts.

This is probably why when people hear about the results of studies like the ones conducted by Alfred C. Kinsey, they are willing to accept the idea that little girls (and I speak of little girls because I once was one and I know nothing of little boys except that they do act out with sexual violence against girls at a young age – again, because I experienced this) are temptresses, full of sexual desires, longing to be fucked by males.

They believe this because “God” said so and if they don’t buy into that, then they believe it because “Science” said so. These are the same things – absolutely the same! – both invented by men to serve the purposes of males. Science and Religion are two sides of the same coin.

Both God and Science inform us that females were made for males, were made to be fucked by males, desire to be fucked by males, at least, as much as males want to fuck us. Women are a reflection of the male, they say. Women are the “other half” of men. Women need men, they say. We need each other, they say. We long for each other, they say. This is either God’s will or natural, according to which side of the coin you’re looking at.

Either way, girls want to be fucked by men, according to men.

Everything a girl does – even a little baby girl – is taken as evidence of her “sexuality” or her supposed desire to be fucked by men, if not  now, then at some later date, not too far off because someday soon, maybe at age 9 or maybe at age 12, she will have her first period, thus signalling her overwhelming desire to be fucked, all according to men.

I did a post about a sorority a while back, which was targeted by perverted males online and by liberals. A lot of things struck me about that story. It was the same sorority house that was allegedly targeted by Elliot Rodger (I now believe that story to be a staged hoax and I say why in some other posts here), but this was the Alabama chapter. The women were targeted in part because they are white and mostly blonde and because this is the group that is largely targeted by males for pornography. I found the story interesting, too, because liberals were commenting on it and saying that the girls looked like whores that they looked like Playboy bunnies and so on.

What bothered me so much about it was that I have an entirely different perspective, especially coming from a rural and fundamentalist religious upbringing. The concept that these young women really were just older girls (somewhere between girlhood and womanhood and probably very sheltered from things that highly sex menand many liberals take for granted) who were promoting their sisterhood, which looks like a big pajama party, was lost on a lot of men and libs. They innocently put the video out on YT and a bunch of fappers showed up and made violent and sexually disturbing comments on the video. Ultimately, the video had to be pulled and it seems like the girls got in some kind of trouble for it – of course.

There are portions of the video in which the girls are blowing glitter and beckoning at the camera for other girls to come and join their sorority. It’s an advertisement with a targeted audience – which was completely lost on the perverted males and the liberal males. To them these girls, who really are just innocent girls with an extended childhood, which they should be allowed to have, were pornography. They interpreted baggy, ragged, cut-off shorts worn at the lake to be “Daisy Dukes.” This is just how males view girls and women and this was a very public incident in which a bunch of men stole a portion of these young women’s innocence. They accused them of things that existed only the men’s own sick minds.

I think about this bunch of girls every now and then when I am here alone and I’m doing traditionally “girly” things. I think about it when I am taking care of my personal hygiene and appearance, when I’m dancing, or working out, or baking cupcakes with pink frosting, or sleeping in my satin sheets, or any number of other ordinary things that I do that I know would be interpreted by men – somehow! – as sexual, as being in relation to them and their dicks. Even though I am in complete solitude, I still have a sense of my activities somehow being interpreted as sexual submission or communicating a sexual desire for men. This is the sick program men put in our heads from the time we are little girls – they tell us every thing we do is about them.

This scrutiny of our behavior for indications of “asking for it” starts young, as does the training in femininity. I have so much femininity training that, frankly, I don’t know what is me and what is the training. I am often regarded as being prissy. I was always taught to sit up straight and to behave in certain ways and there are many things for little girls to know: How to sit in a dress; how to get in and out of a car properly, how to sit down properly at the dinner table; how to walk, how to stand, how to wait for a man to open the door. All these things are training.

We are, also, trained in such things as how to groom ourselves, how to wear our hair, how to apply make-up, how to dress properly.

So, if you are a disciplined and obedient female child, you do what you are told – as I did. In so doing, however, you are perceived by men as having a sexuality, as longing to be fucked.

If you want to see an example of this kind of thing, check out some clips or old episodes from a television show that ran on TLC (The Learning Channels, interestingly enough) called, “Toddlers and Tiaras.” The little girls are trained, from infancy in some cases, to learn to be sexually appealing to men. The little girls don’t know that this is what they’re being trained for – for men to fuck them – but, this is what is going on. The little girls are shown how to “shake it” even when they don’t even have the “it” (mammary glands) and how to wiggle their hips. The girls see these as dance moves (I know because I took tumbling and dance lessons and I was into my twenties before I realized that some of these motions had a sexual meaning – again, to men the have this meaning)  only as that, as motions in dance, the same way you do heel-toe and dosey-doe in some styles of dance.

This obedient and disciplined child, in the clip below, has no idea what she is being trained to do:

 

The child’s only desire is to please her parents – she does not have sexual desires. She would not even understand what that means. She is dependent on her parents and her entire life, her safety, her needs (needs meaning food, water and shelter – not sex) are wrapped up in doing as they say.

This is sexual grooming – done by the parents. It’s an example of what we’ve all been subjected to, either to a lesser or greater extent. What is appalling about this television program is we see sexual abuse of girls being promoted right in front of our eyes.

How do these fathers view their little daughters? Here’s an example:

 

You can bet that if he’s not doing it already that at some point he is going to project his sexual arousal onto his daughter. Religion and Science both say that she exists, not only to gratify the male and serve him, but that this is natural and due to her nature, whether sinful or biological, she wants desperately to be fucked by men. If she resists this, she’s a whore (acting against God and Nature), if she goes along with it, she’s a whore – just like the men said all along.

These little girls have their every move scrutinized on stage. We, as girls and women, have our every moves scrutinized by men from the time we are very young and throughout our whole lives by men who are looking for a sign or a signal that we want them to fuck us. They are looking for indications that she wants it. She has her hair in pigtails – that’s hot! – she wants it, they say.  She is wearing a pretty dress – she’s easy – it doesn’t matter that she’s 8 or 11 or 14 or 40. She’s eating ice cream or sucking on a lollipop – to the men, this is a sex act. They can only think of their dicks, even when it is a child. She’s walking away, “Shake it for me!” – because the male believes that literally every step she takes, that every action, every gesture, is a sign that she wants his dick in her.  This is true even when it is a little baby girl – this is when the scrutiny begins. Many, many times I have heard men talk about little baby girls this way. They interpret the child’s play or childish movements or the way her mother dressed her or taught her to behave as a come on. They think she wants it. This is now considered normal – apparently.

We have religion and Kinsey and the related institutions to blame for this, but mostly we have just MEN who are promoting this. Individual men promote this idea even within their own little nuclear slave units. They are pedophiles – maybe there is a better term, but this is the term that we all know what it means when we use it.

It’s men on the left and men on the right. It’s religious men, pagan men, and atheist men. It’s Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and any other political party created and dominated by men. It’s fathers, uncles, and brothers. It’s the sick bastard next door. It runs from the lowest specimen of the human male on the planet to the highest international players. It is institutionalized. It is codified and regulated. It is normalized.

Usually only when some girls end up dead – like Jon Benet Ramsey – does anybody take much notice, at all. Maybe raped and then murdered baby girls are what the demonic left-wing subjugater is referring to when he says we must have “moral libertinism” or “moral libertarianism,” whatever that actually means. Maybe only when girls are dead is this seen as going too far and I would guess that this is the case, since to men death is the ultimate, the thing they fear most. We women have other fears because most of us know what torture at the hands of men is. We understand what humanity and compassion are, too, and we have a concern about human suffering. This is something men seem to have no understanding of, whatsoever. They are, as Valerie Solanas said, “machines,” nothing more than “walking dildos.”

There is an effort, which I have only alluded to above – I have barely scratched the surface –  by men to normalize and legalize pedophilia. There is a lot of excusing pedophilia going on. There is a lot of saying that the pedophile is the true victim. There is an effort to define pedophilia as a sexual orientation by the same sick fucks that brought us the idea that we are all a little gay – this is where that ended up. Feminists who foolishly supported gay men’s rights thinking they would somehow profit from this contributed to this effort. Instead working to free women from men, they have reinforced the false notion of gender and they have reinforced the institution of marriage, which profits only males, and they laid the foundation for the rest of this perversion. Oh, and don’t think these perverts are going to stop there!

When the gays started pushing for gay rights, some people on the Xian right said this would lead to men marrying dogs and goats. They were laughed at. But, in fact, this is right where these people are going. They want to legalize the abuse of animals, too. And, don’t think that men abusing animals is a one-off because it isn’t. Men abuse animals all the time – they rape female animals.

The Demonic Male

I have tried for a very long time to figure out why this is happening. Why are males doing this to us? There is no materially based answer to this question. It is definitely not societal or cultural because it is simply male behavior across the board. This is discussed in the previous post and laid out in the terms of the scientific establishment by TrustYourPerceptions in her recent blog series. It is borne out by other evidence, as well.

The so-called civilization we have is centered around males and their struggle to maintain control over us. Their parasitism of us is the basis for pretty much everything they do, from the sexualization and sexual grooming of baby girls to their waging of war.

I can only tell you what I have seen and what I have experienced with regard to male behavior toward women and girls. I can tell you exactly what I have seen! It is my conclusion that men are not entirely human.

I’ve seen the question posed often, “Are women human?” This begs the question: “What is a human?”  The only answer I’ve been able to find about that is that the term means “ape man.” “Hu” means “ape.” If you look at men, this is how they appear – they look like some more primitive life form. They are, in fact, more basic. Their reproductive systems are very basic and so are their brains. They are less sophisticated in every way due to their endocrine systems.

It may be that we have been made into a vehicle for a certain type of spiritual being to obtain access to the physical world. This being, although he is our creation and our offspring, is very different from ourselves. He is a mutant. He is a DNA mutation – they Y chromosome being a mutation. He is a secondary being and, by his own reckoning, if you take into account how he wrote the stories of his genesis – an inferior being, since he is secondary and has no god-like creative powers.

I have survived many sexual assaults by men by acknowledging that they are not human beings. This has been a coping mechanism for me. (There’s a line in a song by Tina Turner, “Private Dancer,” in which she says, “You don’t think of them as human.”) After all, if we are humans, then what are they? They certainly don’t act like us, anyway, especially when they rape. They have lightning fast mobility – they can snatch you  like an alligator. The are silent, sneaking up from behind you, to attack. They are emotionless, lacking all compassion or any sense of humanity, in their attacks. Also, they are fond of biting – they literally try to eat our flesh and suck our blood in some of their attacks on us. In this way, men do not seem at all like women. They really do seem like some other type of life form.

The biting thing is very, very common. I have been bitten by men numerous times and one attacker bit me and tried to suck my blood – just like a vampire. He was a guy who mainly got off on beating up women and was a serial attacker. The dancers in the club, since they have insisted on them having closer physical proximity to the male predators, are not infrequently bitten by men. One woman I’ve seen had an entire set of teeth marks, upper and lower, on her breast from a man who bit her. Bill Clinton is notorious for biting women. He is supposed to have bitten a waitress along with some other women. Recently, Donald Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewendowski, was defended by a lawyer (in the case in which he grabbed Michelle Fields from behind and bruised her arm)  who is known for having bitten a woman in a night club.

Taking big chunks of flesh out of women’s bodies and sucking blood is not usually something we associate with human beings. So, if they are human, then what are we?

Similarly, with rapists – if they are human beings, then what are we?

Men will defend other men for these actions and it’s because they all have some understanding of themselves in relation to us, which we don’t really have.

They literally see us as food. They call us “honey” and “sweetie” and talk about how we taste. This is because we are livestock.

Fathers who abuse their daughters do so for the same reason. They know  things we don’t know. Certainly, we don’t know them as children and even when we become independent, adult women, it is very baffling to many, if not most, of us. We are prey. We are groomed to be such. They know it and any insistence that we are human beings or that we don’t want to be fucked by men on our part is disregarded because they know that this is our place in the order of men’s world. It is our place to be dressed up, made-up, dancing whores. Everything we are is shaped and forced into conformity to this end and it isn’t just fathers who do it, but every man we encounter, every male teacher, every male employer, every male religious figure, every male is an authority on us – at least, in his own mind – he believes we are whores, our purpose is to be controlled and regulated, as such. He sees no other option because he is incapable of seeing women and girls as anything else. We exist only in relation to a man’s (or mens’) dick.

We “lose our innocence” when we see men for what they are. When we come to know the truth about men, we lose our childhoods forever.

For these reasons and for the fact that I can actually see them – literally see what they are and they are not like us, they are not human, whatever that word really means – I am convinced that they are nothing like us. That they are, in fact, some kind of parasite on us and on this planet. I don’t think they are a natural part of our world. They are certainly not a natural part of our lives. The only way can truly live is to get as far away from them as possible. It’s the only way to get a good, deep breath. It’s the only way to stop their violence against us.

When I say I see them as something far, far different from us, I literally mean I have had the experience of seeing them in a different physical form that appears demonic – just like all the depictions of demons you’ve seen in art from around the world, including in The Goetia. I started seeing this shortly after I left the Morgue (Mormon Organization) and my sense of everything I thought I knew was shattered and I had to start over with my perceptions of truth. At that point, I began to see men (all men, no women) walking around who are actually demons.

Carefully, I started to talk to people about this and I found out that it was a very common experience, especially among the dancers. I’ve seen entire audiences that look like they’ve been taken over by demons and I’ve seen full-blown, physical demons – as physical as any human in the flesh. They are horrifying and they have often display big, sharp teeth.

I used to go into Yahoogroups years ago, when that was a thing, and I’d find people talking about this. There is a whole discussion about “reptilians,” which has been started by David Icke and which I believe is a cover for the truth, which is that this is what men are. Lots of men talk about this subject in MUFON and conspiracy circles because they are trying to control the conversation. They try to say it’s the Illuminatti or it’s related to underground military bases, but I think this is a cover story.

Demons are not something to do with religion. A lot of Westerners automatically think of Christianity when they hear the term, but these things are very old and are found in the most ancient records and monuments going back for millennia. The depictions are all very similar.

If we just look at one famous Western text, The Goetia, which is a catalog of demons, we se that most have what we recognize as male physical characteristics. There is one or maybe two that likes to appear in a feminine form, but this is not his real form. We, also, commonly refer to the demons as “he” and “him.”

The behavior of the demons, according to grimoires, such as this one and others by Western occultists, is very similar to that of ordinary human males. The demons will try to play on human sympathy and compassion, which they see as a weakness – just as men do to women. They are very deceptive. They will try to trick the conjurer. They will try to consume the conjurer. They are strengthened by the blood and spiritual energy of women and children and by acts of sexual depravity, which cause fear in the victims. The demons feed on the energy of fear.

Men behave toward women very much like demons. The demons are seducers, who can take on a different appearance. They see humans as food, and as vessels and vehicles, just as men perceive women. We are both livestock and vessels for their demon semen.

It is well known that the demons particularly hate women. Men, also, hate us.

In every way I can think of men behave just like the demons and, of course, I have seen many of them either shape-shift into demonic form and back or I have seen the demons staring through their eyes.

If you are still reading – if I haven’t lost you – because I know how absurd this seems because it is very contradictory to how we have been told things are. It is contradictory to everything represented as a fact in media, not only now but for a very long time. But, what if what you are seeing as human men is actually just part of mind control programming? What if it isn’t the truth? What if there are some facts that, although very contradictory to how you’ve been led to believe the world works, explains it all? It explains every horrifying experience you’ve ever had with a male.

Here is an example from the Dr. Phil Show, May 17, 2016:

There are actually two episodes around this date involving the woman above and her abusive boyfriend/husband. She says something similar more than once over the course of the two episodes, you will hear it once at 4:00 (4 minutes) into the above video. She says, “I can see it.” And Dr. Phil (a psycopath in his own right) asks, “What do you see?” The woman replies, “A demon.” This is not a metaphor. She means, literally, she sees that he is a demon in the flesh.

I’ve almost gotten used to hearing these stories because I have now heard them so often always from women and the demons they see are either in the eyes of the men, in the face of the men, or more rarely, you’ll see the full, nasty, malformed body of the demon. It is always a man – always! The only time this differs is when males who are supposed authorities on demonoolgy, Ufology, the occult, or the Illuminatti conspiracy are telling the story. When I talk to individuals, it’s always the same. It is men who take on this appearance. Most of the time it is women who see it. Only one instance do I have of a male telling me this story and he was under the influence of some illicit drug at the time he saw it.

We had this discussion at my old private blog not long ago and there was a mixed response. There are lots of women who never see this. Then, there IS a whole bunch who do see it. In one case, a woman’s friend was married to one of these things. She pointed it out to her friend who said that she was aware that he was an apparent demon, but she thought he could overcome it. That woman was eventually murdered by her husband in an obviously staged “accident, which last I read (and I did follow up on the information provided), he got away with.

With the dancers, it is very common to see because the men cannot control their demonic nature, apparently, when they are sexually aroused (which seems to be anytime they are in the presence of a female human with abundant life force energy) or when they become angry. This is when the demon comes through and you see it in their faces – the face will shift – or just the eyes – and sometimes you will see the whole form shift and then shift back once they regain control.

To these men, we are like dancing sides of beef! It’s like in the Looney Toons cartoons where the coyote sees the roadrunner as a big juicy pork chop. This is how they see women and girls, in general, and this is why they are doing these things to us – to keep the food supply and the vessels close to them, under their complete domination. Men’s life force is very weak (this is known to people who study Qi Gong, but it is obvious if you work with this energy and can see it). They are often drawing energy out of the room (I see this, too) and people who have weak forces always draw off people with larger supplies of this energy who are in close proximity to them – which means women and children. Men are energy vampires – even when they are not biting us and drinking our blood or sticking their dicks in us. Even being near them is very energetically draining to us – not to mention nerve-wracking and anxiety-inducing.

It is very common in cases of so-called domestic violence for the woman to see the man appearing as a demon. Certainly, it is common to see him acting like one, even when he is free of the influence of alcohol or drugs.

When men do horrible, vicious things, they like to say that someone else made them do it. They used to say, “The Devil made me do it.”  Maybe this isn’t far from the truth – except, they are the devils. They are the demons. They act the way they do because they are these things in physical form and they are using women to obtain these forms. They have tweaked our DNA just enough to make it possible for them to infiltrate us and pretend to be what we are – this seems to be a common M.O. with men.

The shapeshifting phenomenon is, also, not unusual around the world. It is not accepted in Western culture or if it is acknowledged it is seen as the work of the devil by the religious people. More often than not is dismissed. Yet, you will find it all throughout the North American continent among the indigenous people, you’ll find it in W. European witchcraft, in African spirituality, and today – right now – if you want to learn about this, look down on our southern border or in Mexico. You’ll, also, find many people having experiences with all kinds of shapeshifters in the Phillipines and probably in every other place, if you can get people to talk to you about it.

This is not a strange thing to people who are not so grounded in Western culture. For me, it’s something I have learned to accept and I, also, think that there is much more to be learned about it. From an occult science perspective, there is a fairly reasonable explanation for how this is possible and it comes back down to what we are on the sub-physical level. On that level, it is clear, that men and women are very different and this is why our physical bodies are different, even when their bodies look like ours, they are still different. They are hairy and smelly with knobby knees – just like a lot of demons! There are many different types and appearances of demons – they don’t all look exactly alike.

There are, also, hierarchies in demonology. Some people say that is from the demons that what we call “civilization” is derived. This doesn’t sound at all incredible to me!

This is why I say the only way to stop every terrible thing that is happening in the micro and in the macro is to, at least, limit the number of these things that are entering the physical plane. It is my sense that the last thing they want is for more of us to be able to see them for what they really are. Lots of us do see it, but just haven’t come to terms with it; we are not trusting our own perceptions. A lot of women are like the woman in the Dr. Phil video – they just expect these demons to act with some respect and humanity toward them. But, this is impossible for them, just as it is impossible for men, in general, to be anything other than what they are or to see us anything other than livestock and vessels for their own purposes.

War Officially Declared on White Women by Black Men and Women

The purpose of this post: To warn my sisters of rhetoric that has now turned to physical violence and to remind you that we do not need other people to do the feminist work that needs to be done at this time because most of it is based on dispensing information, which has been suppressed and is generally not available in the mainstream of male-dominated life.

On August 26, 2015, blonde-haired, blue-eyed Alison Parker was reportedly murdered on live-air by a black man who declared in his manifesto that he hated “white women” and he wanted a “race war.” There is nothing “senseless” about this or the unprovoked murder of a white cop in Harris County, Texas reported on the night of August 28, 2015. The problem is not “crazy people” and it isn’t a problem of access to guns. If you examine the information at the websites linked below, you will see that it makes perfect sense. Furthermore, your survival may depend on understanding it.

In the past few months various black leaders have encouraged black people to kill white people (which includes women) and police officers.

White women are being attacked by tranny men who want our space, who want to be in our very skins, by black feminists, by black men who see us as “disposable fuck toys,” by race-baiting, hetero-normative liberals and, as always, by white men who have waged war on us for thousands of years wherever we are. None of these wars have been officially declared until now.

I will provide information about this below. My advice to my white sisters, if you want to take it and I hope you will, is to stop apologizing to anyone, stop explaining yourselves to anyone who says you are not doing feminism correctly. These are not your friends and they don’t have reasonable points, anyway. The lives of white women are very different and we have every right to talk about the horrific ways in which we are being targeted. Because of the power of the liberals and their influence on feminism, I have hesitated to talk about the horrors faced by white women because many of these things are regarded as “white privilege” by men and liberal feminists and, also, I have a desire to be inclusive because I love all women and I love our diversity. But, it’s time to talk more about things like white slavery, the trafficking of white American women overseas, the objectification of ordinary women going about their business (see previous post), the pursuit of white women for pornography and other aspects of the so-called “sex industry” and the general targeting of white women. Our enemies have tried to silence us and I have stayed silent about my own experiences in the past, but no more!

Liberals hate us – male and female, they hate us! They especially hate light complected women (and any women who, by accident of birth, conform to the white male’s standard of beauty) and I don’t know how many times I’ve read about a crime committed against a black person and looked at the comment section to see people urging that the same crimes be done to a white woman. We have a lot of enemies. We must not dismiss what they are saying to us as just talk or they don’t really mean it.

Meanwhile, I encourage you, especially if you look white – because, let’s face it this is all about your appearance, not your race, not your ancestors, not who you are  (Alison Parker may have been Jewish) – especially if you are light skinned and light eyed, to take special precautions at this time. WAR HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY DECLARED ON US simply because we exist and we are perceived (not only by men, but many black women) as the property of the white man.

Since the apparent murder of Alison Parker and the shooting of another blonde woman, who was left for dead by the black male killer, for no reason other than she was a white woman, I have been doing some digging around in some areas of the World Wide Web that I would not normally venture into. What I have found there is disturbing.

Black feminists have been telling us to sit down and shut up, white bitch. But, now, it appears that lots of black women and men are calling for our deaths and acting out violence on us, which has gone mostly unreported by the national news.

Here are examples of what black feminists have been saying to white feminists:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/why-we-need-to-talk-about-white-feminism_55c8ca5ce4b0f73b20ba020a – here we are told that our experiences and our lives do not matter.

http://thesaladbowl.kinja.com/white-girl-sit-down-1715623861 – This one contains a link to the snuff video in which Rhianna kidnaps a white woman in order to get revenge on a white man (because women are male property, of course), it is full of hateful slurs against women and has been applauded by the left and many black women have defended it. We must not be silenced by our enemies, so when they tell you to “sit down and shut up,” it’s important to keep talking about our lives and our experiences and warning other targets. We must keep repeating to (to ourselves and others) that we are not objects and we are not property.

More defending the snuff video, referenced above: http://www.blackgirldangerous.org/2015/07/this-is-what-rihannas-bbhmm-video-says-about-black-women-white-women-and-feminism/#main-navigation – the author declares, without providing one shred of evidence, that white women are harming black women and, somehow, we benefit from causing them to suffer.

Some white, liberal, “sex positive” feminists have swallowed this hateful rhetoric and are regurgitating it: http://bellejar.ca/2015/03/08/4389/ – and we don’t need this, either!

Here’s another one from a #BlackLivesMatter feminist, in which the author asserts that any kindness and outreach on the part of white women is highly suspicious. So, we are damned if we do and damned if we don’t, it seems – nothing new here for us: http://www.forharriet.com/2015/07/no-time-for-white-guilt-why-im.html#axzz3kVGOLnHX But, I don’t think these #BlackLivesMatters feminists need to worry about hordes of white women rushing to be their allies, anyway, since we generally don’t align ourselves with people who advocate or support the murder of ourselves, our children, our family members, cops or men, in general. We are women. We are powerful. We are the only ones on this planet with the power to create human life, which is exactly why we don’t need to murder anyone to achieve our goals.

Make no mistake, black feminists who harbor completely misdirected hatred toward white women, are at the foundation of the #BlackLivesMatter movement, which has meshed with the New Black Panthers and other violent black groups, as discussed in this article: http://magazine.good.is/features/black-lives-matter-feminism-history The contents of this article are absolutely disgusting. In it, a black feminist express venomous hatred of white women who have done nothing to them. Reading this is a lot like visiting an MRA site for the first time – it explains a whole lot of things that were not entirely clear before.

Here are videos in which they call for us to be murdered:

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/28/black-activists-called-for-lynching-and-hanging-of-white-people-and-cops/ – See the video, which was broadcast the night before the black male murdered Alison Parker and shot another blonde woman, in which a black man and woman urge black people to murder white people and cops and photograph it. Warning: Extremely profane!

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/09/sandra-bland-protest-all-white-people-should-be-killed-with-video/ – more profanity (also, this video auto-plays when you go to the page).

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/26/fukyoflag-threatens-veteran-pregnant-wife-and-fing-piece-of-s-unborn-creature/

Full length call for lynching of white people (people, in this case, includes white women and children as the property of the white man) and cops, “somebody needs to become a sacrifice”: http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/71783139

(Update 8:31 – Right now the above link is still working, but in case the above podcast has gone or does go missing, this might explain what happened: http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/30/texas-podcast-that-called-for-killing-cops-goes-missing-after-execution/ )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97Y9FjtQ5Wc – This an influential religious leader, Louis Farrakahn, calling for the murder of white people (including women because women are people only when men say we are) and police. He is a very influential leader of primarily black men, but many black women, also, listen and obey when this man speaks.

This is from about 3 years ago. Here a man and woman call for the murder of blonde-haired, blue-eyed people (“people” includes women who are seen as property of the white man), in defense of “the black man.” Again, profanity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eseHDyaip0U

In the past year or more, and increasingly in the past few months, there have been innumerable attacks on white women by black men and women. Therefore, I urge you to re-evaluate your safety at – this time.

This is an example of the kind of targeted attacks on white women that have not been making the national news while they tell us repeatedly about how only the lives of criminal black men matter:

This is from about two years ago:

http://6abc.com/news/south-philly-neighborhood-rallies-to-stop-attacks/763459/ – these kinds of attacks have been going on for two years and finally some people rally publicly to try to stop it. Why has this not been reported in the national news? Why are we not finding it at liberal websites like RawStory and Jezebel?

My updated safety rules for women (in the U.S., which is where this black male and black female violence against women is occurring right now) are as follows:

When you are in a public place, be aware of who is watching you – more than usual. White men and black men and women are involved in movements like #BlackLivesMatter and black men and women have carried out many violent attacks on white women for their cause.

Try to keep a distance, a larger than usual personal space, between yourself and others who might perpetrate a violent act.

Avoid gatherings and avoid crowds, especially those that might contain people who have declared they want to kill you.

Stay armed and be ready to take cover or defend yourself.

Remember that you are more vulnerable alone, especially since they have said they are looking for white people alone to kill.

Try to avoid the cops whose adrenaline and testosterone is higher than ever now and who are just as likely as ever to rape and kill women and enable other men to do the same. Just because we have been named as targets along with them does not mean they are not the same anti-woman patriarchal establishment they have always been. Therefore, try to stay out of any circumstance in which you might have to have contact with them, especially now, when they are emotionally worked up and more likely than ever to be violent toward women. Also, know that despite the #blacklivesmatter and other liberal rhetoric, white women are the largest demographic raped and murdered by police. Here’s an example of a such a case, which you’ve probably not heard about: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/dashcam-cops-kill-unarmed-mother-applaud-marksmanship-brag-face-exploding/ and for more information and pictures of her (she was very beautiful) see: http://investigations.myajc.com/caroline-small-shooting/ So, don’t buy the liberal’s story that white women are not subjected to extreme police violence – they want these things to happen to white women, they say it over and over, again. (I have many personal stories, involving rape and stalking by cops – some of it is so bad, I still can’t talk about it many years later. I believe white women are especially targeted for sadistic sexual violence by cops.)

Remember that your enemy is not just the white man, who wants to hurt or kill us because we won’t lie down and let him stick his dick in us – it is all men and some women who are working side by side with them: https://waronwhitegirls.wordpress.com/2015/06/12/warning-white-women-declared-1-enemy/ ALL men hate us and have the potential to be violent toward us.

Stay anonymous in this new McCarthyite era.

We do not need people who hate us in our groups or in our discussions. We do not need people who keep saying, “What about me!” – whether it’s men or trannies or black women telling us to shut up. Our lives and our experiences do matter and we have the right to talk about them and to talk about possible solutions without being shouted down by narcissists who want us dead. We try to be nice, but that doesn’t work. We protest that we are all on the same team. But, they’ve already decided what we are (“racist white bitches”), so it doesn’t matter. You don’t have to include people in your groups or your circle of friends who hate you, who are trying to undermine what you are trying to accomplish.

And, what I am trying to accomplish is simply this: I want to warn other women. I want to warn young girls. I want to tell you that you do not have to have a life that centers around men or even includes men. You live your life for yourself and let your allies, whether you are lesbian, straight or asexual, be other women – those who are worthy of you, who aren’t trying to take something away from you and talking about how you don’t matter. Form your bonds with other like-minded women. You do not have to include all women, especially those who are telling you to shut up because what they have to say is more important and being targeted by white men is some kind of privilege. We don’t have to listen to this anymore or try to appease these women, anymore, because we see that their true colors are showing. They are not just telling us shut up, anymore, they are advocating and, in many cases, perpetrating violence against us. We don’t need to appease them or try to get along with them simply because WE DO NOT NEED THEM to get the message out to the women and girls who need to hear it.

I’d, also, like to remind the black men involved in this race war that they will not win. Your leaders are hired provocateurs and their entire purpose is to cooperate with the white men in power, in hopes of sharing that power, and they are setting you up. They are selling you out right now and bathing in your blood. Maybe you’ll get joy out of murdering more cops and white women for a little while, but this is not going to end well for you. See video below for why (more profanity, of course):

I am not taking any commentary from anyone on this article. I have spoken to my audience and I hope you will heed my advice. Whatever anyone else has to say on this subject, I’ve already heard and I’m done listening to it. I’m not going to appease anyone who wants to suck my blood or see me dead. My sisters are the only ones I care about and I don’t see anyone else talking about this subject yet – maybe they don’t know or maybe they are afraid to, but we already have a whole mob of white men on the net trying to kill us, so what’s a few more million black men and women.

Related links:

Woman who urges black people to kill all white people plans a special event on 9/11/2015: http://popularmilitary.com/woman-planning-fck-your-flag-day-on-911-says-all-white-people-must-die/

(Posted 8/31/2015: Armed black men and women shout at texas cops, say they “will start creeping up on you in the darkness.  http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/08/31/armed-black-panthers-to-texas-cops-we-will-start-creeping-up-on-you-in-the-darkness/ )

Blonde Women at a Sorority Targeted, Again – This Time by Liberals Instead of Elliot Rodger

Elliot Rodger, the California mass killer who targeted “blonde sluts” at a sorority who didn’t even know he existed – literally didn’t know, until he started shooting at them – was angry with women, particular women that he projected his own sick thoughts and delusions on.

Well, it happened, again, but the perp wasn’t a mass shooter this time. Instead it was a hit opinion piece by someone named A.J. Bailey, which you will find here: http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/08/bama_sorority_video_worse_for.html

What is not mentioned in this article or ANYWHERE else that I’ve seen in the numerous articles about this that I’ve looked at is that this objectifying film – and it is objectifying – was made by two males. There is a crotch shot. And, there is a bit of film of one of the women sitting down on a wooden bench that has clearly been manipulated by the video-makers to make it look like she is twerking. Not one critic has said anything about the two perverts with cameras who made the video, although plenty has been said about the “whores,” “sluts,” “bimbos” and “racist bitches” who appear in this promotional film, which was supposed to be a recruiting tool for their sorority.

Bailey criticized this video for it’s lack of diversity. There are no apparent black men or women in it and none of the women there look like tranny men. Also, most of the women are blonde and blue-eyed and have fair, flawless skin. Apparently, this is some sort of crime for which women deserve to be tortured and die, or at least, should not be allowed to show their faces in public.

Well-groomed, well-dressed, homogenous, asexual, non-inclusive, blonde-haired, blue-eyed witch.

Well-groomed, well-dressed, homogenous, asexual, non-inclusive, blonde-haired, blue-eyed witch – not here to satisfy anyone’s lust.

I have some news for liberals. There are whole entire parts of this country filled with white people, where the women in the population look like the young women in this video. They are not “air-brushed.” They don’t look this way to “attract a man” or to tittillate anyone. They are not doing it on purpose to piss off liberals. This is just how they look. I know because I live in such an area in what liberals disparagingly call “fly-over country.” Here 97% of the population, according to the last census, is Caucasian. The rest is American Indian. We have almost no black people here – not because we killed them all! – but, because they never were here, historically. We have no history of black slavery here. Of course, this doesn’t stop the liberal hyenas in the press and in the comment sections from making historically inaccurate and disparaging remarks about us daily, if not hourly.

When I watch these videos, I see young women having fun together – doing what women wish we could do with each other without interference from men (except for those objectifying crotch shots and such from the cameramen, of course). Young women having innocent fun together is not a crime. It is something to be encouraged.

But, liberals seem to be upset at this “pornographic” video in which none of the women are taking it up the ass by a member of a minority group. Because this is not happening, a whole lot of presumptions are made about these women and their character. For instance, they must be racists! Many deeply offensive and hurtful assumptions are made about the women’s sexuality

Being born with pale skin, blonde hair and blue eyes does not make a person racist.

Being born female with pale skin, blonde hair and blue eyes does not make a person automatically heterosexual. It doesn’t make a person any kind of sexual. I can testify that blonde-haired, blue-eyed women with pale skin exist, who are positively ASEXUAL! Imagine that, if you can, you liberals and Elliot Rodgers of the world.

Such women do not NEED MINORITIES to fuck them in order to teach them some kind of a lesson.

Furthermore, simply because a woman is standing somewhere or appears in a video somewhere and she has blonde-hair and blue eyes, this does not mean that she is coming on to you, that she is offering herself to you sexually or in any other way.

Surprise! Surprise! Blonde-haired, blue-eyed women are people, too, and they exist with their own individual personalities – despite being told that they are “cookie cutter cutouts,” “clones” and “Barbies” and have no brains! – they do exist and they have a right to exist for themselves and not for you to masturbate to or to disparage or to turn their existence into one big, long porno movie.

I want to say more about this, but this right here is an example of why we need radical feminism. Often white women are accused of dominating feminism, but what else do we have? Who else will speak up for us and defend us, if not ourselves? Clearly, no one.

The person who wrote this article, this Bailey, took me back to my middle school days.I had to leave school because of all the violence and sexual assault – the pivotal issue being my blond-hair and general appearance, which I had no control over, especially at about 12 or 13-years old. I remember my mother saying to me that the reason some people acted this way toward me was because I was blonde-haired and they wished they were blonde, too. I don’t know if this is true, but the adolescent envy I experienced then – no less violent and dangerous – I re-experienced while reading this article. It’s too bad that some people, for instance, hateful liberals and violent perverts like Elliot Rodger, just can’t seem to leave other people alone. They are driven by their envy and hatred of other people who usually don’t even know they exist until they strike!

And, now this video by this sorority has been removed. It wasn’t removed because the women were performing racist chants or singing about the joys of raping dead women, like some fraternities that have recently appeared in the news. No, it was taken down because the blond-haired blue-eyed women in the video were not “inclusive” of whatever people liberals thought they should be inclusive of. It was removed because nobody can just let innocent young women be just that and because a bunch of perverted men (and the liberal women who support their point of view) think everything any woman does is about THEM! They just can’t leave women alone and they can’t stand it when other people are happy or when they think somebody else has something they don’t have.

Note: I didn’t realize it when I wrote the headline above, but the Alpha Phi sorority was the exact same one that was targeted by Elliot Rodger last year. See the article here: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-isla-vista-shooting-sororities-members-on-edge-20140526-story.html  Bailey should hang his or her head in shame for writing this disturbing opinion piece because it is these mean, ignorant and perverse popular characterizations of innocent women, such as those in this video, that encourage such senseless, targeted (I refuse to say “random,” when it is clear that it is targeted) male violence against women.