How Liberals Infiltrated Feminism in the early 1970s

It is not possible to be either a liberal or a conservative and a radical feminist – or really any kind of feminist. Feminism centers on women and girls and our struggle for freedom from the other half of the population, who have regarded us as livestock, possessions, domestic slaves, and sexual entertainment, since long before anyone can remember.

Liberalism, on the other hand, is anyone’s game. Here in the U.S., they work to undermine property rights for women, rights to self-defense for women, to reinforce gender by means of trannyism, to reinforce the patriarchal institution of marriage by working for “gay marriage” and “marriage equality,” and seek to co-opt women’s energy, which should be used to free ourselves, to assist black males and Muslims in fighting racism and religious bias, and literally any other kind of charity case that comes along. That is liberalism, as it functions, at least, here in the U.S.

Liberalism is, in fact, as much an enemy of women and feminists as conservativism is. Both work to keep women subordinate to men. Conservatives are more open about it and often wrap their hatred of women in religion and faux concern for women’s welfare. Liberals on the other hand, encourage women’s subordination by denying the abusive nature of men, and by pretending very often that there is equality between men and women, when there is clearly not and can never be.

It is Christian conservativism that is largely responsible for undermining women’s legal rights to bodily autonomy, although, these are natural rights, which is why stripping our legal rights from us often results in a lot of death and injury. But, this doesn’t bother Christian conservatives because they believe in God’s will and the disposability of women as mere helpmeets and servants to men. I think of the right as the primary purveyors of violence against women in our own homes, because this is where the man rules women in their way of thinking. There are many sex abusers among them who use their patriarchal authority to hurt women and girls.

But, the liberals are primarily responsible for taking us into some of the worst depravity that we have to deal with outside our homes. They have taken their gay rights movement and turned it into a gender rights movement, wherein “gender,” which we know is an artificial social construct to begin with, is whatever they say it is. Furthermore, they have enlisted members of the patriarchal medical and scientific establishments to back up their enormous fraud.

I like to try to think of ways to deal with these people, usually my thoughts always come back around to a couple of points: Get safely away from men and then start talking about all the things they don’t want you to talk about.

A lot of what we’re going through has happened to women before us and if you look at the article, “The Liberal Takeover of Women’s Liberation,” which was first published in 1973, at this link: you can see the tactics of our enemies and reverse-engineer possible solutions.

In this article, the author describes how the liberals manipulated or tried to manipulate women and, if we look at this article, we see what works and what does not. The liberals did everything to undermine the women and to try to channel their energy into ideas that did not work, that wasted the women’s time and depleted their energy.

One thing I noticed about this article that I thought was especially important has to do with writing and publishing. The liberals tried to encourage the women to form groups and teach what they knew, thus limiting their audience and circle of influence. But, when you write and publish, you have something that reaches many  more women and lives on for generations, maybe forever.

I hope you will read it and come to your own conclusions, but it looks to me like this: Writing and publishing, which has never been easier, is our best avenue. I, also, do not think we require “icons” or central leadership. Nor do I think it is wise to politicize what we do. Anytime you have a group or a leader, it is easier for others to manipulate and obfuscate.

Feminism should always center, single-mindedly, on women and girls and on our natural rights.

Update on Jeffrey Epstein, Child-rape Trial and Donald Trump’s Many Lawsuits

In recent posts, especially this one and this one, I mentioned a Palm Beach, Florida convicted child rapist, named Jeffrey- Epstein, a Jewish-American billionaire, who has a lot of wealthy and influential friends, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. There’s an update in the case against him, which has recently been re-opened, and, once again, Trump’s name is coming up.

It’s early morning and yet, this is shaping up to be quite an interesting day, if you follow the adventures of Donald Trump, who in the last 24-48 hours has accepted two endorsements, one from a guy who once used this rape metaphor, “‘I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.” in an interview with Connie Chung – and another guy, Mike Tyson, a Muslim who raped a beauty contestant in Indiana and went to prison for the crime for three years. Unlike the endorsement he received from the former grand-wizard of the KKK, David Duke, no one is asking him to renounce these.

Trump, in fact, said that everybody was too hard on the rapist, Tyson, whose victim was only 17-years old at the time of the attack:

After hearing all that rape victim-blaming, it probably will not surprise you to learn that Trump has been sued for something similar. This is another case that no one much is talking about, which was filed back in the 1990s, the victim was a beauty pageant producer, and unsurprisingly she has been similarly smeared, outright lied about, in the couple of articles that have surfaced about this suit, which was filed in Manhattan:

Now, for some reason – I don’t know why – Trump decided to stand in the State of Indiana, in the very same city in which this woman was very savagely raped by Tyson and brag to the crowd there about this endorsement:

“Mike Tyson endorsed me,” Trump told the crowd. “I love it. He sent out a tweet. Mike. Iron Mike. You know, all the tough guys endorse me. I like that, OK?

“We need toughness,” Trump is further quoted as saying after making the above statement. He appeared on stage at that rally after a lengthy speech by the “enjoy rape” guy, an obscure sports celebrity, named Bobby Knight. The whole thing, especially the comments about Tyson have been pretty well blotted out by the mainstream media, as pointed out in this article:

Meanwhile, it seems that the lawsuits are piling up. Mostly he’s being sued, but he and his Wife #3 are, also, threatening to sue other people.

Trump seems to have particular problems with female journalists and pundits. Several days ago, Cheri Jacobus, announced a $4 million dollar defamation lawsuit against Trump, his former campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski (the same one who battered and bruised former Breitbart reporter, Michelle Fields, at Mar-a-Lago, on camera and with witnesses, which case was declined by the highly corrupt court system in Palm Beach, Florida), and Trump for President, which is apparently the legal entity’s name that is trying to get this psychotic clown elected – supposedly, anyway.

For a long time, this country has been becoming increasingly dangerous for journalists and, in fact, anyone who expresses an opinion that indicates they have fallen out of lockstep – usually with the left. But, now we see it here coming from Trump and his band of Men’s Rights Activists and rape supporters, presumably on the right. Here’s the latest example:

Today, an article came out in GQ magazine, which has been called a profile of Melania Trump, written by Julia Ioffe. The piece is pretty straight-forward and not especially critical of Trump’s third wife, however, this hasn’t stopped Wife #3 from threatening the author and the magazine with something “through the law.” But, perhaps more troublesome is that the author is receiving the same treatment that female reporters always get at the hands of Trump, the same treatment Michelle Fields and Cheri Jacobus (both Republicans) got. It’s the same treatment women get from Trump and his followers, all the time.

She’s being predictably threatened with death and, although, I haven’t seen specific examples yet (although, there are some interesting things in her Twitter feed this morning), it’s safe to assume that she’s being threatened with all kinds of sexual violence, as well. This is Trump’s M.O. His followers have, also, been threatening delegates in the upcoming presidential election (the actual people who cast the deciding vote on who will be president), which is an assault on the Constitutional electoral process in this country, which is being supported, wholeheartedly, by Trump-supporters who are falsely claiming to be Conservatives. (I’m not a Conservative, but I know what one is – or is supposed to be.)

At issue in the magazine article are a few things that Mrs. Trump #3 did not like. GQ did some investigative research into her Communist family (perfectly reasonable since this woman may be in our country’s White House) and discovered that her reprobate father had impregnated a woman, who he then tried to deny he impregnated, and tried to get out of paying child support for. This was all in court documents and included in the article. This is not such a big deal, except that Mrs. Trump #3 said she did not have a brother.

The other issue has to do with Mrs. Trump #3’s extensive plastic surgery, which she denies. Now, it is not unusual for models and porno mag stars (Melania Trump is both) to engage in some cosmetic enhancement. It’s almost a requirement. So, why lie, especially when it is very obvious? It looks to me like she’s had two nose jobs and, at least, one breast augmentation, which has begun to encapsulate (form scar tissue around the saline implant) and is highly noticeable in the third picture down, in which she is wearing red glasses, in the BritishGQ photo shoot from a few years ago, which was done inside Donald Trump’s own private plane before he married her.

Here is Julia Ioffe talking about the piece and the possible lawsuit:

It seems like there are no members of the Trump family, even the newcomers, who are capable of telling the truth – about even the most benign, meaningless things.

Meanwhile, here’s an article from Fusion today, detailing some of the “toughness” this female journalist, is receiving:

While everybody is talking about this and while Bruce Jenner is making a video of himself using the ladies’ room at Trump Tower– imagine running into Mike Tyson in the ladies’ room at Trump Tower!!! – while all this is going on, there is a very interesting update in the ongoing Jeffrey Epstein child-rape and sex trafficking case, which nobody much seems to be talking about, at least, not at the usual U.S. news outlets. Another one of Epstein’s many victims has filed a civil suit (they’re only allowed by the terms of the last court fiasco to bring civil suits, by the way – not criminal ones) against him, also, naming Trump as one her rapists and abusers.

It’s all like a magician’s stage show – and you are being dazzled by capricious clowns and dainty dancers, meanwhile here’s today’s headline in the U.K.:

“Donald Trump denies rape of teenage girl at ‘sex party with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein,”

When I first saw the headline, I naturally thought of Virginia Roberts. But, Roberts was 14-years old when she became Epstein’s victim. This is another girl who was 13-years old at the time she says she was held captive, physically and sexually abused and raped by both Epstein and Trump. But this victim’s name is just coming to light: Katie Johnson. You can read the articles and see the usual tactics – the victim being silenced, threatened with her own death and that of her family, if she ever speaks. You, also, see the standard response from Trump, smearing the victim and claiming it’s a “hoax.” Remember, they said “hoax” about Michelle Fields until a fourth video emerged showing Lewandowski grabbing her.

Remember the way they perform a trick in this magic show?  Here’s another little sleight of hand: Look at those dirty Mexicans crossing the border, meanwhile don’t look at the H1B visa program, which is actually where Americans, often highly skilled and educated Americans, really are losing their jobs. It’s, also, the red carpet roll out to human traffickers and has been used by Trump to bring in girls as young a 14-years to work for his agency,  which has, also, been followed by lawsuits, as mentioned in a previous post. It’s how Melania Trump got here, too.

Here’s another one at the Daily Mail in the U.K., and if you have been following Trumps other attacks on women, you will be familiar with the language and the M.O.:

In the above article, you will see a picture of Trump standing in a photo together with Ghislaine Maxwell, the accused groomer and procurer of little girls for the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Here’s another one in the U.K.:

Here in the U.S. there is dead silence about this!

Update late tonight, almost midnight, this article appeared at the conservative web site, RedState:

The media are all on board the Trump Train right now, including those on the right, who have stooped so low as to go along with Trump’s idea that it’s all right for men to use the ladies’ room.

I have no hope that these suits are going to go too awfully far in exposing the men involved in raping and trafficking in little girls. Epstein, Trump, and Clinton and all their insider friends never get in much trouble.

Although, the New York State Attorney General is still talking about bringing a suit against Trump University, which has been in limbo for years, to bear – and more quickly since if the bastard does get elected, it might be impossible to go forward with any of these suits.

We have two front runners right now and likely the two contestants in the upcoming Presidential election who will have any chance or get any significant amount of press: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Both are in all kinds of legal hot water – Trump is being sued by everybody, criminally (for fraud and racketeering) and civilly, and Clinton is under investigation for her handling of emails. Trump will likely have to give a deposition in New York next month in the criminal case against him. He’s got two civil suits with something like 5,000 plaintiffs accusing him of defrauding them. One of the plaintiffs, a woman, dropped out of the suit because of harassment from someone acting on his behalf.

So, let me say about this carnival ride, it doesn’t matter who is elected President of the United States. This country is a lot of trouble. Women are in a special lot of trouble because they are coming after us on all sides. We are surrounded by criminals and perverts and no country – no women – can go on like this for long. We will have to find a solution and it won’t come through elections, or the legal system (which only serves the criminals), or any remedy that involves males, or anything but our own minds and our own will to be free.

Next post, I plan to talk about the infiltration of the Women’s Movement of the late 1960s and early ’70s by liberals. It’s been done before, but I want to put it in reference to the bizarre encroachments on women’s privacy and safety we are now seeing in the form of trannies. I’ve added an old “Feminist Resources Page” up at the top of the blog. It needs some updates and additions because I did it over a year ago. I will be updating it sometime in the near future.

Additional material:

Updated added late this evening: Trump, you may know, makes money off his casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey, which features strip clubs. Strip clubs ain’t what they used to be back in the 1990s. I don’t know about these clubs or the laws in Atlantic City governing them, but I do know that many clubs are now teeming with violent porn-addled johns. I don’t know why Trump’s clubs would be an exception. It turns out that he, also, has – according to the website RedState – an escort service, Trump Escorts. I am not familiar with escort services, but I know they send women (mostly women) out into situations where anything can happen to them at the hands of perverts. Here’s some information about Trump Escorts: When you read the information at this link, note that these women being sent out by Trump Escorts are referred to as “models.” You’ll probably recall the lawsuits by models who expected to come to the U.S. on H1B visas and actually “model” and actually be paid the agreed upon salary, which was discussed in a previous post, I’m sure.

Here is a direct link to a sleazy advertisement for Trump Escorts in Manhattan:

Also, here is a link to an article at Heavy, from there you can access scans of the court filing against Trump and Epstein by Katie Johnson at ScribD. The article, also, gives this information: Johnson says in another document that “in 2008 I worked as a free-lance model and earned an average of $200-$300 a month.” No other information about Johnson could be found.

Make no  mistake, this will not affect his chances of being elected one bit – we live in a country that loves rapists and loves turning little girls  – especially little white girls – into “whores” in one way or another. I know, first hand, how it goes, how exactly they do it – and it isn’t just billionaires, it’s the old farmer down the lane, his hired hand, the guys at the cafe in town who gather whenever it rains. They are all complicit.

For your amusement or horror, as it may be, an insurance commercial from 2005 featuring Mrs. Trump #3 as a “sexy female duck”:

Men Committing Violence Against Women and Girls in Restrooms, Locker Rooms, and Dressing Rooms

I am dedicating this post to the blogger, ror1774, of Reclaim our Republic. Another one of my favorite bloggers, HocusPocus13, posted a comment there and I tried to reply, but my response – as usual at WordPress when I’m trying to give information about something, it seems – went down a black hole never to be seen, again. This post is a response to a couple of articles posted at, entitled, “Bathroom Wars Humiliate American Normal Majority: Proud Woman Goes Viral; Liberal Version of History.

So, I’m making a whole post about the subject here, which is mostly just a compilation of internet resources on this subject of perverted men doing things they shouldn’t be doing to women and girls in what are (or were, anyway) legally protected public spaces, such as restrooms, locker rooms, and dressing rooms.

I will start by telling you I have recalled three personal incidents involving perverts and dressing rooms or changing rooms. I didn’t remember the third one until tonight – there may be more, because this is actually a pretty common phenomenon, that we forget very unpleasant incidents.  We women do this so that we can go on trying to be, at least, somewhat functional in our lives (and I am barely that). We often push unpleasant experiences to the back of our minds and it takes some thinking to recall them.

The worst incident involved a disc jockey who came into a dressing room at a night club, pulled out his penis and testicles, fondled himself, touched me and then wanted me to touch his privates. I got out of the room as fast as possible while trying not to upset him.(I’m very petite, he was very large, hairy and gross, and I didn’t want him to become violent.) I didn’t say anything to anyone because I knew it would be pointless. I drove home, but had to stop half way home to open my car door and vomit. I told a friend about it and she knew the manager there and insisted that this behavior would not be tolerated. She told the manager. The manager talked to me and long story short because if you are a woman reading this, you already know, they refused to fire the pervert and I never worked there, again. Usually, it is the case that if you report anything like this to anyone, even confide in a well-meaning friend, this is what happens. So, this may be why you don’t often hear about these incidents.

I had two other instances that I can recall: One involved a man jumping into the dressing room with me, saying, “I’m not going to hurt you,” while blocking my path to the door. Since I am petite, I basically just ran under his arms and out the door and a security person got the guy out. He was not forced to leave the premises, however. There were no repercussions to him, but I was very worried he was going to come back, follow me later and try to kill me, etc.

On the other occasion I can remember, things went a lot better. I got out of my car at the gym, parking near the door, so as to avoid the longer walk, which is usually more dangerous than the shorter walk. A huge, man spotted me as I got out of my car, and I saw that he saw me. I hurried inside the door and ran straight into the changing room. I could hear the conversation outside as the owner of the place stopped the man, who was not a member, as he was coming in the door and asked where he was going. The perp told the owner that he was following a woman (me) and he described me. The owner chastised him and made him leave. Not another word was said about it by anyone there, including me. I shudder to think what would have happened if this huge man had actually come into the dressing room (I was not armed on this or any other of these occasions because of highly restrictive gun laws and city ordinances in all in the three different states and their cities, in which these incidents occurred: New York City, New Jersey, and this one was in Texas), but I was waiting and listening.

Since I’ve already been deemed a racist white woman for simply existing and there’s no place for me to go from here with that, I will, also, mention that these men fit a pattern of stalking and harassment that I’ve experienced involving the majority of male predators not known to me in that they were non-white. (I do regard these events as not only sexually, but racially, motivated incidents. But, as the world’s whore, I’m supposed to accept this and not even think about it, let alone write it or say it out loud.) In order of the presentation of the events I just described, the perpetrators were a very Jewish-looking Jew, a Moroccan (probably Muslim), and an American negro.

It is, also, a pattern that most of the time when white women experience the worst violence and rape from men, it is men known to us and for white women, most of these are white men. But, there are no exceptions to male violence, only kinds and degrees of it, and all types of men, regardless of race, nationality, or religion harass, assault and rape women. This includes men who fancy themselves to be women. Strangely, – and I’m not the first “racist” radical feminist to notice this  – most of these are white men as you will see when you look at the majority of sex offenders in the category of trannies attacking women and girls in restrooms and similar places.

There are numerous radical feminist sites that have been documenting these crimes by men against women in these private spaces for quite a while. Some are entirely devoted to the bizarre new societal phenomenon of “transgender.” To be clear, men cannot become women. There is no such thing as “transgender,” just like there’s no such thing as “transspecies” and men cannot transition into or become women anymore than they can become cats or dogs. Also, unlike the term “transsexual,” which implies some surgical or chemical alteration or, at least, putting on a dress and some lipstick, a man doesn’t have to do anything to become a “transgender woman,” rather the “transition” is simply based on his feelings.

Despite the liberal rhetoric that goes something like: “You don’t think men would really dress up like men just to get into the ladies’ room, do you?” The fact is that men, at least some of them, will do anything to get into a space where they can harm a woman or little girl. They have entire websites online and there are people who call themselves PUAs (pick-up artists) who have devoted an entire career to how to get their hands on female human beings so they can harm us.

Here is a video about the problem:


In the video, above, she shows you that this transgender thing is all about men getting into the ladies’ restroom.

She provides a link to this video, which discusses a barrage of incidents involving tranny men attacking women and girls in locker rooms, restrooms, etc. (The argument of the left  – and very recently, some on the “new right” – is simply one of denial; they claim this never happens!):


The first brave women to alert us all of this problem and really sound the alarm bell were female attorneys, many of them lesbians, who were seeing the crimes in their practice and experiencing Pigs in Wigs trying to get into lesbian gatherings and complaining about the “Cotton Ceiling.” The “Cotton Ceiling” is a term that refers  to a man’s inability to put on a wig, and convince lesbians that he is one of them, male equipment and all! Lesbians who refuse to sexually accommodate the pigs in wigs are deemed “bigots.” This sounds like a joke, but it isn’t.

Here’s a list of websites by some of the first women to pull the alarm:

Gender Identity Watch:

GenderTrender: – see, also,

Bug Brennan (Cathy Brennan):

The above women, along with other brave souls, spoke out and did so at the peril of their careers and their well-being. One of those brave souls is a famous academic and author of, “The Female Eunich,” Germaine Greer who was no-platformed (they may have relented, I don’t remember) at a British University for refusing to say that men can become women or that men are women. There are great costs to women who don’t fall down to their knees before these man-gods.

Men and tranny men, in particular, have tried to infiltrate any space where women gather, for instance, their intrusions appear to have destroyed the all-women musical festival, MichFest, although other reasons for its demise have been given.

Michfest is a perfect example of how men, pretending to be women, get into women’s spaces and groups to assault us and to destroy our basic right to associate freely with whomever we choose. The trannies and Men’s Rights Activists rejoiced at the death of Michfest and plotted openly online how they could continue to cause problems for women and girls. You will find their discussions about this still online. So, we know that this isn’t about anything they say it is. It really is about gaining access to girls and women for the purpose of doing some kind of harm.

I never realized trannies were much of a problem until they started infiltrating our websites online, pretending (badly) to be women and feminists. They have invented all kinds of names for us:

TERF: A redundancy, the letters stand for Trans-exclusionary Radical Feminist. It is redundant because radical feminism has always excluded men – all men. It’s similar to their other term, SWERF,” which stands for Sex Worker Exclusionary Radical Feminist, which is, also, redundant and misleading since we don’t recognize the term “sex worker” and we are abolitionists opposed to all forms of human enslavement, including our own.

CISGENDER: This is a term they’ve tried to get us to use (which I will never use, of course), which legitimizes gender role stereotypes and has something to do with how well a man or woman conforms to societal expectations of her. It’s another term they have invented to reinforce the false notion of gender, which radical feminists have been working to destroy because it is harmful to women and girls.

Transphobic: This is another term used to silence anyone who paid attention in biology class. It is used together with other terms like “bigot” and “racist” to describe any woman who says anything a tranny (or other MRA for that matter) doesn’t like.

The male tyrants, when they came into our spaces, insisted that we call them by the pronouns “she” and “her” and whenever they pretend to be offended by something they will say, “Check your pronouns.” You may remember what happened to former Breitbart reporter Ben Shapiro when he failed to use the appropriate pronoun on a television program and was charged with knowingly “provoking” a violent tranny man:

Here’s the vid:

You will find an exhausting list of incidents of violence against women perpetrated by men in ladies’ room and by trannies against women and girls, in general, among the following links:

(Note on the subject of dealing with enemies: They don’t like the term “tranny” and try to dictate how we address them. Whatever they don’t like is a signal of how to deal with them. When you say something and they don’t like it, keep saying it! That’s one way to drive any libs absolutely nuts! Also, when you allow them to dictate what you say, they are controlling you and they must never be allowed to control you, your words, your actions – because then they begin to control your mind. So, another Rule of Engagement: Respect people who deserve respect, but never show respect to an enemy!” And, if there’s something you know they don’t like, do it some more! Don’t worry about “getting down on their level” or being “just as bad” as these men because you could never in your wildest dreams be that low or bad!)

General violence against women by trannies:

Men Love the Ladies’ Room, Transgender Edition from GenderTrender:

GenderTrender, Voyeurism Incidents Lead to Closure of Gender Neutral Bathrooms on Toronto College Campus, October, 6, 2015:

Autogynepheliatruth provides a list of incidents involving tranny attacks on girls and women in many settings; such men then demand access to women-only spaces such as restrooms and locker rooms:

For more information about autogynephelia visit the above website’s other articles:

Breitbart, Top Twenty-Five Stories Proving Target’s Pro-Transgender Bathroom Policy Is Dangerous to Women and Children, April 23, 2016:

Then there’s the problem of women claiming to be men to get into women’s shelters, including battered women’s shelters, of course. This is really a whole other aspect of this problem because there are so few shelters relative to the number of women who need them. Here’s an example:

If you just look up “woman raped in restroom,” you’ll get a ton of results on Google. For years, stand-up comics have joked about women going in pairs or groups to the ladies’ room, this is why we do it – as if they didn’t know!

Be careful what you click on though because you’ll also find results like this one:

collge girl gets raped in bathroom – Free Porn Videos –
Watch free collge girl gets raped in bathroom videos at….

I actually clicked on one similar to the above thinking it was a news story and got redirected to a  porn video of a woman apparently being raped and performing other sex  acts. So, this goes to what I’ve been saying about fighting this kind of thing through legislation or winning the hearts and minds of men. This is just all too common a problem and getting worse. This, also, shows the difficulty of talking about these kinds of things in public places. The people running the establishment would like you to think that Ted Bundy was an outlier, but he wasn’t!

Here are some legitimate results:

15-year old girl raped in Church bathroom:

Video posted at YT about tranny videotaping women in a changing room, posted April 7, 2016 by Mark Dice (he’s an idiot and a misogynist, but even some of them object to this, at least, publicly):

There is a seemingly endless number of these results. Furthermore, contrary to the claims of the trannies, studies have shown that they are, at least, as violent as other males and other information seems to indicate that they are more so.

Still, the liberals are trying to convince us that this is not about our safety, but about acceptance and tolerance – but, I don’t see any tolerance for radical feminists. I don’t see any tolerance or acceptance for little girls and women of all ages who don’t want to be sexualized or turned into breeding stock and who are living with the fallout of so many incidents of rape and sexual assault – just trying to survive and barely hanging on. Where is the tolerance for us?! Where is the acceptance for us!?

I’m, also, wondering how this is going to play out in parts of the country like the State of Kansas where the 2nd Amendment is respected, perhaps better than in any other state in the union. I’m already constantly on edge in public places. I’m never not thinking about what’s about to happen next in a public place because of my past experiences.

Furthermore, I do not see how this is going to help the economy. Many radical feminists that I’ve engaged with who are able to (lots of women entrepreneurs work from home now) don’t leave their homes, anymore. I haven’t been off my property in over three weeks! I haven’t seen another soul and this is how I live because I now live in a society in which strange men feel free to get into my personal space, make sexualized comments, and put their hands on me in public. There’s lots of touching and rubbing going on with men these days in open spaces (this was far less of a problem 15 to 20 years ago) – and no one is taking this problem seriously, at all. What do you think they’re going to do when they are free to enter the ladies’ room with you?!

Lots of women have expressed the sentiment that they will simply have to forego shopping at Target (which has since relented its stance on men in the ladies’ room, but I will never set foot in a Target store ever, again!) or anywhere else where men might be present in a restroom, perhaps lying in wait for his next victim or following you in. I, also, wont be doing whatever it is people do at Planet Fitness. And that goes for any other business that encourages men to enter a restroom or dressing room. These businesses and the polices and laws that allow this are all pro-rape – they are enabling rapists and promoting the harassment, assault, and rape of women and girls. Besides, with my history of being assaulted in such places already, wouldn’t I just be “asking for it?” Shouldn’t I “know better?” Thus, implying that women want to be assaulted by men, so, you see women lose no matter what.

Additional material:

I’m planning on doing another post soon on the subject of the liberal infiltration of the Women’s Liberation Movement of the ’60s and ’70s. The following video demonstrates that liberals and liberal feminists are absolutely an enemy to women and girls. See how the liberals handle the subject of rape enablers and pro-rapists, while pretending to be on the side of women:


And, here are some men on the right, at Fox News, who I’d wager have never been assaulted by a man in a changing room until they vomited, backing up the libs by saying this is not happening. One thing you can always count on is men sticking together when it comes to raping women and little girls:

The All-out Assault on White Feminists/Radical Feminists Online

We’ve been handed this label, “White Feminists.” I didn’t come up with the term, someone else did – someone who hates white women and radical feminists and doesn’t want us talking about things like human trafficking (white slavery), prostitution, and the way white women and even little tiny white girls are treated as the whores of the world, fit only to be raped, used in porn, beaten, and knocked down in every way imaginable.

I just had an eye-opening experience.

I looked at some “feminist” channels at YouTube, which is usually not a good idea. (If you look up “feminism,” at YT, you will get a barrage of sexually abusive, pornographic videos, mostly by men and MRAs). There is only one radical feminist (actual feminist) I know of left over there: Terri Strange. Although, she hasn’t made any videos for quite a while. You’ll, also, find that if you do a search there are almost no videos by the likes of Andrea Dworkin or Sonia Johnson. They used to have some old material there, speeches and lectures, from years ago, but they are long gone. The radical feminists are gone!

What remains there tells you something about what is acceptable talk from women about feminism. It feeds one of two agendas:

The Right-wing: There are still some non-liberal white women talking, but they are pushing a patriarchal religious agenda and talking about the “evils” of feminism and feminists. Everyone I’ve ever followed gets around to blaming feminists for something men do. Then, of course, there are the femras – the female MRAs.

The Left-wing: These seem to be mostly women claiming to be feminist, but who are in fact liberals. They talk about feminism, but they talk about “choice” and how “white feminists,” which is apparently the new code word for “radical feminists,” are to blame for everything. And, of course, many of them defend the “rights” of tranny men, which are “men’s rights.”

Now, I ask you, if liberal feminism and white-woman-hating forms of feminism, in particular, were not serving a male agenda, then why are they allowed to exist on YT, when radical feminists, in particular white, American feminists have been expunged?

Mancheeze, a pseudo-radical feminist, just did a video for women on YT about how to post videos there and deal with the men. It’s a very good video and the advice is good. But, the fact is there are no women (with the exception of the one I mentioned) who are talking about actual feminism on YouTube.

I’m all for helping women, but I don’t see a point in helping women who want to enslave me, who want to prostitute me to men, or just want me dead so they can dance on my grave.

“Liberal feminists” are not feminists, at all. They are working against us with a hostile agenda – every time I give one of these women a chance by taking a glimpse of anything they have to say, I’m rewarded with their blatant, unashamed hatred of me.

Now, I wrote a couple of times about “enemies” and how to deal with them and I did a post on observing Donald Trump and how he deals with his enemies. I remember a comment from NMPT ( in a discussion we were having about dealing with enemies. There really are “rules of engagement” and most well-brought up, nice, young ladies aren’t familiar with them. They should not be faulted for this.

But, don’t buy into this “Be the change you want to see in the world” crap! This kind of thinking is meant by your enemies to weaken you – it’s a psyop.

When we defend ourselves as white women, who have white women’s particular problems in this world, and when we talk about that, we are doing something – probably all we can do. We must not let these women silence us or shame us into not calling them out.  For instance, we might be accused of “going down to their level,” as a way of deterring us from telling it like it is – telling the truth.

Let me tell you, there is no way we could possibly get that low. If these women are being paid to say some of these things, I wouldn’t be surprised. We know there are people paying members of the left-wing to agitate, to cause trouble and instigate aggression. The evidence to me is the peculiar fact that these particular women are allowed to speak in online forums and we are not! We are silenced by both men and women – and when it’s women doing it, it’s mostly lefty women. Now, you have to watch a little because some of those women look suspiciously like men! But, many are clearly female.

These are our enemies! We are a very tiny minority on this planet. Here in the U.S. we are a small minority and shrinking because of male violence and depravity, especially that of the white male. So, the reason you don’t hear a lot of white women kicking up a fuss about these abuses is that there simply very, very few of us.

Plus, we are the number one, Grade A, choice food supply for the male predator. We are the one that he most does not want to escape – we are the livestock! We are the gateway to the creation of more food for his violent perversions. So, this is why we are being targeted especially heavily.

Then, we are expected to clean up this mess – essentially, clean up our own blood on the floor after we’ve been nearly killed by men. And, it’s other women – liberal feminists – who are making this demand!

Really, it cannot be over-stated what great enemies these women are to us. They hate us as much as the men do – maybe more, judging by their relentlessly hateful rhetoric.

These women are handmaidens. They are so testosterone-poisoned that there is likely no hope for them. Therefore, there is little point in engaging with them. If you must engage with them, treat them with the same level of “respect” you would give any man, and don’t get bogged down in a discussion, thus allowing them to feed on you.

Also, unlike Mancheeze, I don’t encourage their speech. (A Major Rule of Engagement is: Never Help Your Enemy!) Simply because they’re women doesn’t mean they have anything valuable for us to hear. They are highly destructive. I’d like to hear from actual feminists, but we know that’s not going to happen at YouTube or almost any other social media site except WordPress, which has a very good policy on free speech, which they actually appear to stand by.

I certainly don’t seek them out, but when I run across them, as I did today, I have no problem in calling them out on their racially based hatred of me. I won’t get bogged down in a discussion with them because it would be like trying to discuss with a brain-damaged MRA parasite. This is a form of self-defense. It’s not much, but it’s all we’ve got online.

Anyone who is trying to silence me or trying to silence other “white feminists” is fighting on the wrong side – they’re fighting on the side of the pimp, the john, and the sex trafficker. That’s something I cannot allow to happen.

I encourage you, white feminist who is reading this (and you don’t have to be “white” to be a “white feminist” as our enemy has pointed out), to keep talking. Don’t let them tell you what to say or how to say it. Keep talking even when you think no one is listening. Keep writing. Keep telling what you can of your own experiences. It’s hard some times, don’t hurt yourself doing it – don’t be a martyr because that doesn’t help anyone. But, keep writing. Write radical feminist fiction, write radical feminist non-fiction, and publish it anywhere you can.

Always protect yourself with anonymity. Don’t expect any help from law enforcement because there isn’t any. Protect yourself any way you can think of. It is your natural right endowed to you by your creator. And, remember you are worth just as much as anyone else – maybe more so. Our mothers always told us we weren’t better than other people – but, I don’t know about that – after my experiences in life, I think we are. We should, at least, always act like we are and not let these men and women tear us down and try to convince us that we are somehow guilty of things we are in no way responsible for. Our female enemies get off on this just like male sex predators do – don’t give them that satisfaction! We are NEVER responsible for what males do to us and we are NEVER responsible when they don’t stop doing it.

Update to this post: I changed some information in this post after I was blocked by Mancheeze at her YT channel, either for saying that male violence is innate, to which she responded that there is a case of a boy socialized to be a “lovely boy,” or because I left a single comment on a video at her liberal friend’s channel, stating my objection to her rabid hatred of white women and “white feminists.”  It appeared that she had shadowbanned some of my comments before they were all blocked from the view of anyone not logged into the account. At first, I thought it was a mistake – she bans men from commenting, but I am clearly a woman and a radical feminist and I don’t know why exactly I was being shadowbanned and then blocked. I am guessing it was because I objected on her friend’s channel to the hateful speech against white women and “white feminists”  -one time, I commented!  So, I revise my original position on Mancheeze – she is an incorrigible liberal. I deeply apologize to anyone I have ever misled by recommending her blog or her videos. I, also, revise what I said about YT: Radical feminists are completely silenced there – just as I was.


Human and Sex Trafficking, H1B Visas, and Trump’s Modeling Agency

When I was working in the clubs, I was occasionally taken aside and warned by a sex trafficking survivor about taking jobs overseas. I heard some horrific stories from women who looked like they could be models, almost all of them blonde. What was odd was that they never addressed the two or three other dancers who had been present, but they would wait until they left and address me directly.

The fact is that there is a certain type of women and young girls who are preyed upon by men in very specific ways. These men sometimes use female handlers who will appear to befriend you and try to persuade you that doing pornographic magazines or pornographic films is a good idea. This happens to American women inside the U.S., but what happens to American women who believe they are taking a job with an entertainment or modeling agency abroad creates a whole other set of problems.

Once you are in that foreign country, anything can happen to you. You are vulnerable in ways you wouldn’t be in your own country. When women cross international boundaries, they can more easily fall prey to sex predators and pimps. I’ve mentioned before that this has happened to a surprising number of especially attractive (conforming to the ideal of male beauty standards), especially pale and blonde, American women I met working in the night clubs. They were the survivors. There’s no way to know how many more of them did not survive. At least one of them suffered from terrible health problems (cancer) quite probably as a result of her ordeal. Being repeatedly raped is very hard on your life force energy.

But,  what I want to talk about in this post is foreign girls and women being brought into the U.S. to work under suspicious circumstances. Specifically, I’m going to provide some information that is available online regarding Trump Model Management, which is said to have been founded in 1999 by Donald J. Trump.

Now, this is political season here in the U.S. and Trump is running for president of the U.S. and whenever there is a presidential race, there is a tendency for those who favor a candidate to dismiss anything bad said about him as simply “the other side” attacking their guy. But, I’m not on a team. I’m not a Republican or a Democrat. I don’t vote and I’ve never voted in a presidential election because I have actually read the Constitution of the U.S. The last time I had a party affiliation, which was back in the 1980s, I was a Libertarian (lots of things have changed in that camp since then!) So, I’m not picking on Trump for any kind of political reason. It’s just that he’s made himself very difficult to ignore (most recently saying that he’s fine with men in the ladies’ room, which statement he predictably “amended” within 24 hours only to say the same thing). As I said, I recognize him very much as that “high end customer.”

I’m posting this, in part, because I’m having nightmares about him very reminiscent of the kind I used to have when Bill Clinton was in office. I had one that woke me up just a few hours ago, in which I was part of his “harem” of female employees. In the dream, I experienced the kind of psychological and sex abuse I’ve endured, in real life, from men who hate women – and not just hate us, but want to devour us!

There are some nagging questions that I just can’t get out of my mind and I don’t know why no one else is asking them. For instance, where did all those photographs of nude, 14-year old girls, hanging on the walls of Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, come from?

The Jewish-American billionaire, Epstein is about to go to court, again, over the rape of some little girls, but I notice that the  media are already speaking in misleading and derogatory terms of the victims, in particular, Virginia Roberts, who has been the most vocal of his accusers, who is called “an ex-teen prostitute,” and trying to smear them and make the perps look like the “real victims.” This shows, again, how difficult it is to obtain justice in sex trafficking or rape cases – and this is a matter of both. Epstein, who I’ve blogged about previously, is reputedly a sex trafficker and his victims include very young girls, some as young as 12 years. But, 14 seems to be the magic number, as I pointed out a couple of posts ago. Why 14? I keep wondering.

Perhaps there is a connection between this magical number, 14, and the H1B Visa program, which is and has been exploited by many U.S. employers, most notoriously the tech industry and Disney World! But, Donald Trump has, also, taken advantage of the program, which sets a side a coveted number of such visas, which allow the companies to bring in foreign workers at cut rates. Lots of Americans have lost their jobs because of this visa program – but, you don’t hear a lot about it in the news, mostly they just beat the drum about all the dirty Mexicans crossing the border illegally.

But, it turns out there is even more to H1B Visas than meets the eye. Not only are American workers losing their jobs, but it is a red carpet roll out to human traffickers and, in particular, sex traffickers.

There may have been more to Mitt Romney’s comment about Ivana (Wife #1) and Melania Trump (Wife #3) than what it seems upon first hearing it: “Donald Trump has had several foreign wives,” Romney reportedly joked at the National Republican Congressional Committee’s annual dinner. “It turns out that there really are jobs Americans won’t do.”

In fact, Trump has had two foreign wives, both from Eastern European countries. The current wife, like the first wife and like Trump, himself, has had her resume puffed up a little bit in the press. There’s some question as to whether she was ever a “super model” anywhere. According to what I’ve seen on line, she came to the U.S. in 1996 (to New York City) on one of these H1B Visas (a specially reserved, limited visa,  supposedly for “highly skilled workers” with abilities that could not be found in a U.S. citizen, which are the necessary qualifications) and went to work for a modeling agency. These visas have a life-span of three (3) years. After that time, the worker has to leave the U.S.

Now, as an American who was born here, I have no first-hand knowledge of the procedure that is used for becoming a U.S. citizen for the foreign-born. I know quite a few people who have done it, though, and they say it isn’t easy. Even if you are a refugee from the war in Bosnia some years ago, it’s not easy. The Feds make it hard for the average person. If you have family here already, sometimes it’s easier. The entire process is, in my opinion, disgusting and needs to be revamped. The requirements are disturbing, in some cases. And, the whole process is so cumbersome and awful that I can certainly see why lots of people choose to forego it and stay here in the U.S. without permission. What I mean is that this system is making criminals out of a lot of people who would prefer to do the right thing, if the process were reasonable. Right now, it is very unreasonable, especially for the people most in need (women and children whose lives are in danger in other North American and Central American countries) and hard-working people we want to invite to our country.

Melania Trump found a legal way to stay here past the 3 years and it is something that is done, probably far more often out of desperation than love – she married an American citizen. She married a really fat, old, balding, rich guy, who was able to help her get her paperwork straightened out. This guy has been called out for his hypocrisy on immigration. In his defense, this wife (#3) said that she is in immigrant and had to “put my birth certificate” and so on, in order to go through the procedure the “right way.”

She did an interview here:

There are a couple of problems with what she said, at least, in my book. Problem #1 is pretty obvious. Most people cannot do what Melania did to obtain citizenship. They don’t have the resources to keep flying in out of the country every three months to get their passport stamped. They don’t have a boyfriend whose sister is a Federal judge and has a team of expensive lawyers at their disposal, either.

Now, I’m not for flooding the country with immigrants, especially Muslims who want to rape and kill white women. Like a lot of people, I think it’s important that the U.S., and especially certain regions of the U.S., retain our cultural identity – such as it is. I happen to think that’s important, especially as a lover of the arts. There are economic reasons why we don’t just open the gates and let everyone in, too.

But, the 2nd problem I have with this interview and this whole situation with Melania Trump is that it is pretty obvious to me that this woman is not what the media and the pro-Trump camp have tried to say she is. (For instance, she is not well-educated, she dropped out of fashion and design school, she was not a highly-paid super model, and, in fact, she did some porn – which I cannot believe has not surfaced in a big way. I’ve seen some of the milder stuff.) They have tried to paint the picture of Melania as a well-educated, highly intelligent, independent, self-sustaining, successful and well-established woman before she met Trump. But, when I listen to this woman, I do not hear a lot of either intelligence or education and, in fact, she came here from a former Soviet country, a Communist country, where she was a member of the peasant class – an underclass who speak her language, Slovenian. She came from a dirt poor background probably much worse than that of the average Mexican, whom her husband so disdains. She came in here on this Visa program and needed a way to stay. She needed a green card. She needed a way to finance her naturalization process – it’s very expensive to become a U.S. citizen. So, she found herself “a high end customer.” I don’t fault her for that, but I do fault her for making it sound like anyone could or should do what she did in order to do things “the legal way.” I think it’s disgusting.

After Melania left the first modeling agency, she went to work for Trump’s agency. According to numerous reports, Donald Trump was seen in the company of Melania (then Knauss, which was Germanized from the original Slovenian Knav) while he was still legally married to his second wife, the American actress, Marla Maples. Their daughter, Tiffany, was only about four or five-years old when this was going on. That was about 1998. The Trump Modeling agency was officially established in 1999, according to their website.

I’ve made a couple of recent posts about Trump and his connections to Epstein and he has numerous connections to other rich, old codgers who “enjoy the company” of young – sometimes very, very young – women and girls.

I’m going to lay out a little further evidence here that Trump and his agency, which brings in girls as young as 14-years, on these special Visas like the one Melania Knav/Knauss Trump came in here on, may function as a de facto sugar daddy-sugar-baby arranging business. In fact, I’m saying that his agency may function, not only as a legitimate modelling agency, but, also,  as a kind of high-end escort service or mail-order-bride type of service, hooking up rich old geezers with young women and girls, mostly foreign, in-need and highly vulnerable. Again, I wonder where those photos of 14-year old girls came from.

Here are some things for you to examine:

In the video, below, the narrator lays out a case for Trump’s agency providing rich, old men with young women:

A government worker talks in a forum discussion about gemeral abuses of the H1B Visa program:

An article and video on the subject of an apparently legitimate modeling website connected to human trafficking. The site belongs to MC2:

MC2 Modeling Agency is accused of providing female victims to Jeffrey Epstein:

This article talks about the general connections between modeling agencies, including prominent names in the business, and human trafficking:

Trump has connections to another Jewish billionaire businessman, Alexander Mashkevitch, whose yacht was raided for charges, including the trafficking of young girls:

The article and videos at this link discuss the investigation and lawsuits against Trump’s modeling agency. He is accused by some of the models of not paying them:

This 14-year old girl talks about the connection between modeling agencies and human or sex trafficking:

This article is interesting, although it is written from a political perspective. It is from the National Review, which is a Republican publication. As you may have heard, the old guard Republicans -and anyone with an ounce of common sense – doesn’t like Trump. This is not the most objective article, but it has some interesting information:

What the information at the above links establishes is that there is a connection between modeling and sex trafficking, especially when the models are going from one country to another. It, also, establishes a connection between Donald Trump and some other very dangerous, very sleazy, powerful men who abuse and exploit women and get away with it.

What it, also, shows is that women, including white women and very conforming women (some of the victims are not “white” but meet a standard of beauty that makes them particularly subject to male predators of a certain kind), are not privileged. It is not a privilege to be sex trafficked. It is not a privilege to be forced into prostitution. Far from being “privileged,” these women are special targets!

As I’ve said, we will never stop this through any legal or political channels because we are saturated with it and it runs from the bottom of the patriarchal pyramid of power all the way to the very top. All we can do is try to warn other women and girls (just as I was warned repeatedly about this from other women who were survivors) and to do everything we can to keep girls out of the hands of men – any men- but, especially these kinds of men. I am not the first feminist to suggest that the number of predators and potential predators being born must be reduced and that we have that power in our hands.

Gaslight Movie from 1940: Suppressed Version of the Famous Tale of Male Psychological Abuse

You are probably already familiar with the 1944, MGM version of the movie, Gaslight, which starred Charles Boyer and Ingrid Bergman, but there is a chance you may not have heard of the 1940, British National Films version. Some people say it’s better. (I think it is!) It is more true to the original play and certainly makes a lot more sense,  relying on plot much more heavily than the newer version, which relied very much on the popularity of its big-name stars.

I like the style of this film, the way it was made, and the fact that the actors all seem to be English (it’s an English story, after all).The narrative in this version flows logically without gaps in the plot. We get a little more backstory on some of the secondary characters. I like the use of symbolism, both by the director of the film, and in the story, itself, which we see much more in this more balanced presentation of the events.

For instance, you will notice that after the credits of this film run, the camera focuses in on the number of the house: 12. It looks a little like the number on the face of a clock, signalling to the viewer that this is the final hour – although, it is just the beginning of the story. But, whose final hour is it? The next scene answers this question.

Inside the house, a wealthy woman is murdered by mysterious hands. We see his ominous shadow on the wall, as the dastardly figure ransacks the house, even cutting open the furniture in search of something – we know not what.

As you watch this film, which is a revelation of male psychological abuse and domination of women, you will notice that the master of the house is surrounded by different classes of women, each of which receive different types of mistreatment based on their status and their relationship to him.

Before each meal, the master forces the women to pray. He gives thanks to everyone except the servants! It is similar to how the master of the grange tried to wield his patriarchal authority in the book, Wuthering Heights.

Nancy, the maid, is the subject of a great deal of manipulation by two men in the story: The master of the house and one of her many boyfriends, who has been charged by his boss (a retired detective) with the task of using her as an informant of the goings on in the house.

One of the many things I preferred about this version over the former is that in the end, Bella’s rescuer (played by Joseph Cotten in the 1944 version) doesn’t seem to have any ulterior motives. He’s simply trying to uncover the truth and working for Bella’s benefit. (Now, there’s some programming in there, too, because we know that men rarely if ever selflessly help women. They usually want something in return, especially if the woman they are helping is attractive or wealthy and Bella is both. But, it’s nice to see this portrayed.) I always found the Joseph Cotten version of the character (which was a combination of the retired detective and his lackey) to be kind of predatory, giving the sense that Bella was still not really safe in the end.

I think this actress who played Bella, Diana Wynyard, is really a much better actress than Ingrid Bergman, who seems to over-act her part – something Bergman does in other films. Bergman’s overacting in the 1944 version is parodied by Jack Benny and Barbara Stanwyck in an old episode of the Jack Benny Show, posted beneath the film. It’s pretty funny!

Here is the film from YouTube. I hope you are able to view it outside the U.S. because not all YT content is available everywhere. I believe it may be in the public domain. There was an attempt by MGM to suppress  it so that it would not compete with their film. I think it is clearly a very much better film, despite the MGM version having the bigger stars and probably a much larger budget:

Jack Benny and Barbara Stanwyck do their own version of the 1944 Gaslight:

Rape Among the Mormons and What Women Can Learn from Trump: A Two for the Price of One Post

This really is going to be a mixture of topics that I’ve been wanting to mention or maybe even talk about in greater detail, but I’ve got some things going on – like actual work I need to be doing so I can try to get out of poverty next year in the face of a growing mountain of U.S. taxation – still, I find that it helps me to clear my head sometimes to get these things down in black and white.

So, I’m just going to give a couple of these things a mention and maybe I’ll talk about them later in greater detail or not:

The first university I ever attended was Brigham Young, but I left pretty soon after because of a whole bunch of rapes of my friends and being stalked by a man who was reputedly a known rapist in his own country (he was from Korea). I had to leave mid-semester and shortly after that I left the organization – not an easy task back then, especially for a young, blonde-haired, blue-eyed woman because they regard us as walking factories for more”white and delightsome” victims. Back when I did this there was no formal exit procedure – they wouldn’t agree to disagree and just let me go. I was harassed for a little while and eventually unjustly ex-communicated by these evil, sex-obsessed men who run this Islam-like religious corporation. Then, I was harassed some more until I finally left the state and left my family (who were converts – they came to their senses a few years later!) for a while. Rape among Mormons is nothing new, in fact, the organization is founded on the rape of 14-year old girls and the enslavement of white women, and covering it up is as just as old a concept among them. Girls and women exposed to Mormonism get a heavy dose of “white woman’s privilege.”

Here’s a fine example and, as far as I know, the most recent prominent case of rape in Provo, Utah where the main campus for BYU is located:

The Mormons are great masters of victim-blaming, especially when the victim is female. Women are to blame for literally everything that’s ever gone wrong, including a man’s erection. They have an Honor Code, which sounds like a fine idea on the surface (you promise not to drink, smoke or fornicate), but it is really a big set up for female human beings who become the victims of male violence – and male stalkers. I had more than one stalker during the time I was at BYU (I’ve been a magnet for them most of my life!), for which I was blamed – not protected, not anyone concerned for my safety (besides me) only blamed. Mormonism really is the next best thing to Islam and the two religions/cultures/systems have a lot in common. You can read about Mormons and the Honor Code here: 

Right now, according to numerous accounts about this story online, the Morgue (shorthand for the Mormon Org.) is using the old-boy system and the Honor Code to derail the legal investigation into this rape. This case is, also, an example of how white women do not have privilege where any men are concerned, since the victim is white and the perpetrators and members of the old-boy network are negro men. The fact that the alleged perpetrator and those allegedly covering up in the case are black has, also, added to the difficulties, because we’re just a few years behind Sweden and Germany where you cannot even describe the perpetrator of the crime if you’re white and he’s not.

Here’s an interesting reddit discussion on this case, which contains more details:

Next topic: 

What we radfems can learn from Donald Trump.

This alleged Billionaire is pretty much unavoidable in the U.S. right now as he is the present Republican front runner in the upcoming presidential election. A lot of people, like myself, believe he is a plant, essentially strategically placed to ensure that Hillary Clinton easily becomes the next U.S. President. There’s a lot of evidence to support this idea, too. He has ties to both Clintons and to a number of unpopular Democrats, like Nancy “We’ve got to pass the bill so we can find out what’s in it” Pelosi, who have been instrumental in the passage of a mountain of new Federal taxes, including Obamacare, which has created utter wreckage out of a lot of people’s lives, especially entrepreneurs and those who are reliant on allopathic medicine, which amounts to most people. Another reason many people think he’s a plant and this is all a set up is his absurd, over-the-top, public mistreatment of women.

More than one female journalist has said she was subjected to a campaign of harassment after she said or did something he didn’t like. His two most recent targets have been Megyn Kelly and Michelle Fields. Kelly is still employed by Fox, but Fields resigned (along with a half dozen of her male colleagues) from Breitbart, a popular neo-con website that’s really in the tank for Trump, and has never been invited to return to Fox since the battery incident involving Trump’s campaign manager. A journalist and documentary-maker, Libby Handros, described something very similar to what Megyn Kelly went through with Trump when she tried to make a documentary series on celebrity businessmen for television back in the 1980s. You can hear her talking about this experience and Trump, in general, in a recent interview with Ed Opperman, entitled Trump – What’s the Deal:

This appears to be the old documentary, referred to by Handros, that did not get aired because Trump threw a big tantrum:  It is worth watching because it is not only entertaining, but it lends insights into the nature of one of the very worst specimens of human males. It, also, shows that he has not changed – he’s the same then as he is now.

So, this guy is very disrespectful to female journalists. But, there are some other very strange things about him, which I can’t get out of my mind. I mention in a couple of recent posts that he has a connection to the convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton is connected, too, as are a bunch of other celebrities and politicians. Trump has been the subject of some recent lawsuits by young women. Reportedly, his modeling agency has brought in a whole bunch of young girls on specially set aside, difficult to obtain work visas and many of them are very young. The magic number seems to be 14. That number comes up a lot in the stories about pedophiles, for instance, photographs of nude 14-year old girls on Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion walls. Here’s an article about one model who said she was treated like a slave

Trump doesn’t win every lawsuit, but he wins a lot of them. His older sister MaryAnn Trump Barry is a Federal Judge. Coincidence? Also, despite his claims that he never settles, he has in fact settled with some of his victims. He’s, also, being sued/investigated over his fraudulent Trump University. He has harassed one woman who brought such a suit against him until she wanted to back out, according to this and similar articles:

It remains to be seen what will happen to Michelle Fields. She gave an interview today to some dude on CNN:  In this interview, she states that she has not ruled out a defamation suit against Trump and Lewandowski. She has most certainly been smeared and an army of loudmouth, perverts have unloaded their violent fantasies on her online. Reportedly, she had to move from her apartment because of death threats, which are being investigated by D.C. police – I’m not holding my breath that anyone will be charged, let alone convicted for this, of course.

But, there was a woman, named Vera Coking, who defied Donald Trump. I’d like to say she won, but nobody who tangles with this pile of hair and lipids really ever wins. Her story gives an example of what he does to people pretty much everywhere he goes. You see, he really likes eminent domain. This is something that inspires fear in people who own a home or a farm (a property which functions both as your home and your livelihood). It’s one of those things I cannot understand about his supposedly conservative supporters since private property is a fundamental and dearly held right in this country. Right after free speech and the right to defend yourself comes property rights of all kinds in our most fundamental law of the land.

Trump tried to take her house in Atlantic City, New Jersey, by eminent domain, in order to build a parking garage for limousines. Here’s an another, more recent article about her:

Vera Coking – not Trump – is a great hero, a champion of the people. She is a relatively powerless older woman, a widow – and the world is not kind to older women and women alone – who held her own against this monster.

Lest you think I call him “monster” with any lightness of meaning, take a look at how he similarly harassed and threatened some older women and an older man (quite famous now, by the name of Michael Forbes) who stood fast against Trump’s attempt to use Scotland’s brand of eminent domain, which is called a CPO or “Compulsory Purchase Order” to try to force them to sell their property to him for very little money. There is an excellent documentary on this subject, well worth the watching if only for the images of the marvelous landscape on the Scottish shoreline of the North Sea before it was utterly destroyed, along with the natural wildlife, by Trump. Here it is, it’s called “You’ve Been Trumped” and it was made in 2011:

What you’ll learn is that this guy is a heartless con man. He seems to be a chronic liar. He constantly exaggerates his achievements and those of his many wives, often using superlatives, such as “the best,” “the greatest,” when there is all evidence to the contrary and likes to talk about “winning,” even when he’s obviously losing. For instance, he claimed that Ivana Trump (Wife #1) was a championship skier, apparently, there is nothing to back up this assertion. Similarly, outrageous claims about the achievements of his Wife #3 abound. It is a constant theme that he projects himself and those around them as being much better than they are. He’s certainly not afraid to lie.

Moreover, he’s not afraid to lie about or exaggerate the weaknesses of anyone he deems an enemy. In fact, he often projects his own weaknesses onto his enemies. This you will see is a recurrent theme that continues until the present.

I really think women could learn a few things from this classless blowhard, though. We are mostly far too self-deprecating, lacking or failing to project confidence, lacking in brag, possessing a sense of fairness, far too honest, far to unwilling to deliver the low blows. Maybe we could learn a few things about dealing with men, in general, by observing Trump. Trump hates his betters; he hates women. Perhaps if we women adopted these same attitudes and social trategies toward those who are our actual inferiors, men and especially men like Trump, we could put them back in their place.